.gif)
Besides, E. Michael Jones Wikipedia all the fodder that they needed. Firstly, E. Michael Jones is an Anti Semite ad has no authority to speak on Modern Judaism, covering his Anti Semitism with the following:
"Jones has stated publicly that he considers modern Judaism to be a wicked ideology, but that he condemns criticism of Jews based upon race.[3] In February, 2008, due to a complaint of anti-Semitism from the Southern Poverty Law Center, the School of Architecture at The Catholic University of America cancelled a lecture series in which Jones was scheduled to speak. In an interview with The Washington Times Jones said that he rejected racism in all of its forms, consistent with Catholic teaching[2] and responded to the cancellation in an article in Culture Wars.[4]"
Myself being born into an Anusi (Roman and Byzantine Catholic) and Roman Catholic family, baptized
Anusit and Roman Catholic (since my dad was English Catholic-- Episcopalian-- and is still not open about
his Jewish heritage; and my mom had my sister and me baptized by a Roman Catholic priest who was a
friend of her late Evangelical Catholic, getting-ready-to-leave-Catholicism-when-he-died dad), and raised
Anusit and Episcopalian (and not knowing that I'm Jewish until I was 18); I have more authority to speak on
the issue of both than does E. Michael Jones. As far as I know, Ex-Professor Jones has never pointed to
'Amos 5:21-27 to prove how Modern Non-Messianic Jews both inadvertently and deliberately worship
Sikkut v'Kiyun.
In fact, given how little Catholic are encouraged to read the Bible, especially the first three books of Tanakh
(and the fourth, Hadashah, being so muddied up by Non-Evangelical Catholicism over the years to do
awful works against Yeshua and Paul's own people); E. Michael Jones probably couldn't tell you where
'Amos is located in Tanakh-- whether in the traditional Jewish (including Messianic Jewish) or the traditional
Christian order.
Also, if E. Michael Jones really knew Catholicism for what Catholicism is, he wouldn't have had the
following views on it:
"Jones has stated publicly that he considers modern Judaism to be a wicked ideology, but that he condemns criticism of Jews based upon race.[3] In February, 2008, due to a complaint of anti-Semitism from the Southern Poverty Law Center, the School of Architecture at The Catholic University of America cancelled a lecture series in which Jones was scheduled to speak. In an interview with The Washington Times Jones said that he rejected racism in all of its forms, consistent with Catholic teaching[2] and responded to the cancellation in an article in Culture Wars.[4]"
While Modern Non-Messianic Judaism is-- unintentionally and intentionally-- indeed wicked, E. Michael Jones
is not a Jew and thus his little to no authority to speak on the issue of Judaism. Whatever authority he did have,
he dashed along with his credibility by coming from a Non-Evangelical Catholic angle. As I have blogged,
Non-Evangelical Catholicism (Roman, Byzantine, and otherwise) is Pseudo-Christian, Anti-Semitic
wickedness.
is not a Jew and thus his little to no authority to speak on the issue of Judaism. Whatever authority he did have,
he dashed along with his credibility by coming from a Non-Evangelical Catholic angle. As I have blogged,
Non-Evangelical Catholicism (Roman, Byzantine, and otherwise) is Pseudo-Christian, Anti-Semitic
wickedness.
Myself being born into an Anusi (Roman and Byzantine Catholic) and Roman Catholic family, baptized
Anusit and Roman Catholic (since my dad was English Catholic-- Episcopalian-- and is still not open about
his Jewish heritage; and my mom had my sister and me baptized by a Roman Catholic priest who was a
friend of her late Evangelical Catholic, getting-ready-to-leave-Catholicism-when-he-died dad), and raised
Anusit and Episcopalian (and not knowing that I'm Jewish until I was 18); I have more authority to speak on
the issue of both than does E. Michael Jones. As far as I know, Ex-Professor Jones has never pointed to
'Amos 5:21-27 to prove how Modern Non-Messianic Jews both inadvertently and deliberately worship
Sikkut v'Kiyun.
In fact, given how little Catholic are encouraged to read the Bible, especially the first three books of Tanakh
(and the fourth, Hadashah, being so muddied up by Non-Evangelical Catholicism over the years to do
awful works against Yeshua and Paul's own people); E. Michael Jones probably couldn't tell you where
'Amos is located in Tanakh-- whether in the traditional Jewish (including Messianic Jewish) or the traditional
Christian order.
Also, if E. Michael Jones really knew Catholicism for what Catholicism is, he wouldn't have had the
following views on it:
"Jones then obtained his Ph.D. from Temple University and began to teach at Saint Mary's College, of Notre Dame, Indiana. To Jones' displeasure, he found this college to be what he considered to be (in the words of Michael W. Cuneo who interviewed him) "the antithesis of what a Catholic college should be", being pro-choice, feminist and secular. He made little effort to conceal his views, leading to conflicts with many faculty, his department chairwoman and eventually the college's president. His department, which viewed him as a religious absolutist, decided against renewing his contract after his first year.[1]"
Jones needs to wake up and smell Catholicism for what it is. He obviously didn't learn from St. Mary's or
Catholic University of America. Perhaps he'd like to go to then-College, now-University of Notre Dame
Maryland and look over the whole history of Catholicism and how Evangelical Catholicism (and Evangelical
Catholics such as Jan Hus, John Wycliffe, Teresa De Avila, Edith Stein, and Abraham Sh'mu'eloff) were all
treated (the first two victims of being murdered for "heresy", the third having her Jewishness and the fact that
her family was victim to the Catholic-started Inquisition almost even ignored by the Catholic Church, Edith
Stein being murdered by self-proclaimed "Christian" Catholic and Lutheran Nazis-- and the Catholic Church
doing nothing to save Edith Stein, one of their own--, and Sh'mu'eloff having his Jewishness ignored by the
Catholic Church when Sh'mu'eloff was a Roman, English, and Byzantine Catholic throughout his lifetime.
Only Evangelical-- including Jewish-- Catholic and other Evangelical, and other sources bring up that
Sh'mu'eloff was even proud of his Jewish heritage and rebuked that many Sabra'im and 'olim would not
speak Lashon Ivrit).
Jones needs to wake up and smell Catholicism for what it is. He obviously didn't learn from St. Mary's or
Catholic University of America. Perhaps he'd like to go to then-College, now-University of Notre Dame
Maryland and look over the whole history of Catholicism and how Evangelical Catholicism (and Evangelical
Catholics such as Jan Hus, John Wycliffe, Teresa De Avila, Edith Stein, and Abraham Sh'mu'eloff) were all
treated (the first two victims of being murdered for "heresy", the third having her Jewishness and the fact that
her family was victim to the Catholic-started Inquisition almost even ignored by the Catholic Church, Edith
Stein being murdered by self-proclaimed "Christian" Catholic and Lutheran Nazis-- and the Catholic Church
doing nothing to save Edith Stein, one of their own--, and Sh'mu'eloff having his Jewishness ignored by the
Catholic Church when Sh'mu'eloff was a Roman, English, and Byzantine Catholic throughout his lifetime.
Only Evangelical-- including Jewish-- Catholic and other Evangelical, and other sources bring up that
Sh'mu'eloff was even proud of his Jewish heritage and rebuked that many Sabra'im and 'olim would not
speak Lashon Ivrit).
No comments:
Post a Comment