The "Nicole Factor" Is Online

Welcome to the Nicole Factor at

Google+ Badge

Stage 32

My LinkedIn Profile

About Me

My Photo
My blog is "The Nicole Factor" on Blogspot, my Facebook page "Nicole Czarnecki aka Nickidewbear", and YouTube and Twitter accounts "Nickidewbear."

Nickidewbear on YouTube





Messianic Bible (As If the Bible Isn't)


Facebook and Google Page

Reach Me On Facebook!

There was an error in this gadget

Search This Blog

Talk To Me on Fold3!

Showing posts with label legality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label legality. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 9, 2017

Originally On LinkedIn: Be A Boss Like D****d Tr**p & Reap What You Sow. For Example...

  1. Resentment from your business' customers.
  2. Resentment from many of your employees.
  3. A crony- and pseudo-capitalist (since crony capitalism always is pseudo capitalist in) nature in your economy.
  4. A workplace culture of low morale, less and cheapened productivity, and mafiosoism.
  5. A stagnating and declining customer base.
  6. Eventual risk on your bottom line, whether the risk hits overnight or precipitously comes down on your bottom line.
  7. Fair and just removal from your unfairly-gained-in-the-first-place CEO position, in the same way that you unfairly fired those whom were testifying in a probe against you and your immoral, unethical, and illegal business practices; and prosecution against you because of your criminal and unscrupulous acts.

After the demonstration of all that Donald Trump has sowed (with the firing of James Comey being the final bad seed sowed), Donald Trump will absolutely reap getting impeached, removed from office, and prosecuted. Take a lesson from Donald Trump, then: criminality and unscrupulousness pays from your account, and you will be held to account. Especially no unearned executive privilege saves you from that, since earned executive privilege has saved other corrupt CEOs and executives when they've lost the right to it.

Tuesday, May 31, 2016

Originally On LinkedIn: Regarding Government And the Workforce

I will (at least try to) never forget when Former Pakistani Prime Minister Bhutto was murdered on December 27, 2007—and I will never forget the clip in which she highlighted her philosophy on government: "Where the madrassas won't get involved, the government will." 
The equivalent of the late Bhutto's statement for Non-Muslim (or at least Non-Muslim-majority) countries: the government has to and will get involved when the churches, synagogues, mosques, etc. won't get involved. Taking the examples of my people in the Desert and churches in particular—since I'm a Jewish Christian—I highlight why OSHA had to be created and why legislation such as the Civil Rights Act had to be written (Incidentally, what a shame that Barry Goldwater did not support the Civil Rights Act.)
The first example comes when God spoke to Moses about when a house is being built:
“When you build a new house, then you shall make a parapet for your roof, that you may not bring guilt of bloodshed on your household if anyone falls from it.
So much for that being applied and happening in the Judeo-Christian United States! Thus came along the Occupational Health and Safety Administration, since its predecessors weren't adequate enough—and even after Upton Sinclair exposed the equivalent of "guilt of bloodshed...if anyone falls from [a being-built roof]" in the meat-packing industry! By the way, when I Googled to find out when OSHA was founded, I was surprised to see that it was not founded until 1971, long after "one nation under God" should have had an organization to hold the reckless employers and overseers accountable.
Also by the way, OSHA came too late for those such as coal miners in Northeastern Pennsylvania—with my great-great-grandfathers Michael Gajdos, Sr. and Julian Czarnecki among them—and groundskeepers such as Julian's son Anthony (whom, as I've written before, severed three of his toes and his leg up to his knee as he mowed a lawn at the apartment complex which hired him—and his work-related accident partly affected his suicide just months later). 
Were their churches there to raise a voice for them and other workers, to hold their congregants' and community members' employers accountable for the employees' safeties. After all—as especially the Bible-literate ones, including my family whom needed someone to speak up for them as workers, would have known—"Justice, justice you shall pursue!" Yet, not even a layman or laywoman rose his or her voice enough to affect that an organization such as OSHA would be unnecessary.
The same laymen and laywomen also neglected to raise their voices enough when civil rights were an issue, even though "You shall love your neighbor as yourself" automatically implies that nobody should discriminate against anyone else. Because not enough men or women raised their voices until laywomen like Rosa Parks spoke up through their civilly-disobedient actions, and clergymen such as Drs. Martin Luther King and Abraham Joshua Heschel marched as they called for freedom for all Americans, the derogatory signs such as the horrid ones against Jewish and Irish men remained on business-owners' doors and windows, and Blacks and women were lucky if they were paid even remotely close to fairly. Never mind that a Jewish man whom wouldn't have been allowed to apply, James by name, admonished fellow followers of another Jew, Jesus of Nazareth:
Indeed the wages of the laborers who mowed your fields, which you kept back by fraud, cry out; and the cries of the reapers have reached the ears of the Lord of Sabaoth." 5 You have lived on the earth in pleasure and luxury; you have fattened your hearts as in a day of slaughter. You have condemned, you have murdered the just; he does not resist you.
How many church-going businessmen "condemned...the just" such as the Jews (including church-going ones) and Irishmen whom they would not hire, despite that these Jews and Irishmen would have gladly "mowed [their fields]?" How many of these same church-going businessmen had "wages...which [they] kept back by fraud" from sharecroppers, shoeshiners, maids, nurses, and other laborers?
(Incidentally, I have questions for you if you wonder—or, if you knew, still wonder—why my paternal family remained Crypto Jews in even the United States—after all, "No Jews" still reeks of the albe-far-worse Anti Semitism that they escaped when they left Imperial Russia and Austria Hungary. If my family isn't enough of an example, look at the family of lucky-to-be-a-businessman, Austria-Hungary-born Fritz "Frederick Kerry" Kohn.)
Because apparently-pious, God-and-country, "Bless your heart" businessmen withheld wages from and otherwise discriminated against Blacks and women (even with intimidating maxims such as "It's a man's job" and "A woman's place is in the home."), and refused to hire Irishmen and Jews (all while slandering and libelling Jews as conspirators whom owned every business), the Civil Rights Act (including Titles VII and IX) had to be written and signed into law. By the way, in terms of Title IX: you try getting a decent job without some kind of college degree (whether you'd've gotten an Associate's Degree or a four-year-degree), let alone if you had to leave college because you faced horrid discrimination, and tell me when you get that job. 
Even I have a B.A. in Political Science from UMBC, and—according to the National Association of Mental Illnesses' recent newsletter—I am statistically doomed because of mental illnesses, which make me three times more likely to be unemployable than someone with a physical disability—and here's the kicker: I have both mental illnesses and Cerebral Palsy. So, think again if you don't think that Title IX relates to the workforce as much as it relates to the educational system.
I also note that Titles VII and IX far from help me, and they also far from help others—since the government is made up of people whom should be getting involved in their communities both within and outside the government sector, Title VII and IX often fail to be enforced. After all, many of the people who are supposed to be enforcing the Civil Rights Act—not to mention the Americans With Disabilities Act—are the same kinds of people who look down on the kind of people on whom the oh-so-pious businessmen of back then looked down. Therefore, quite a bit of government involvement that's supposed to make up for the lack of community involvement actually becomes a Catch-22.
Nonetheless, the government has to be involved when the communities won't get involved—even when the government gets involved too late for those like Michael Gajdos, Julian and Anthony Czarnecki, and Frederick Kerry, not to mention the Irishpersons, Blacks, and women whom were in similar positions to the positions of the Gajdoses, the Czarneckis, and the Kohns.

Saturday, January 9, 2016

Megyn Kelly: "Conservative" and "A Lawyer" Mein Tuchus!

For anyone whom's wondering, "meir tuchus" means "my butt!" Anyway, no true conservative (Classical Liberal) and lawyer would state that "legal" inherently means "should be legal":

  1. As far as the SCOTUS being the final arbiters of the law, the SCOTUS ruled in favor of inherently-illegal doctrines such as "Ferguson v. Plessy" and, before that, "Sanford v. Scott". The former was not overturned until 1955 (when "Brown" was fully cleared for implementation), and "Scott" en de facto was never overturned until Jim Crow ended, despite that the end of the Civil War ended it en de jure. 
  2. DOMA was in force from the Clinton Administration until just relatively recently in the Obama Administration. 
  3. Legalizing same-sex marriage risks religious freedom within certain contexts. For example, why should an Orthodox rabbi be sued by a couple whom he refuses to marry when he believes that the Flood came because of same-sex marriage in part (which the Talmud does state)?
By the way, speaking of rabbis, one'd think that Orthodox rabbis such as Chief Rabbi Binyomin Jacobs would be helpful during this time of Anti-Jewish and Anti-Christian intolerance—although he's not at all tolerant of either Jewish Christians or gentile ones, or any Orthodox Jew whom even tolerates Christians (despite how Christianity as Noahidism is viewed).

Saturday, November 8, 2014

Even If Nobody Else Is Saying This...

Quite honestly, I wonder if it didn't have to do in part with the Haredi constituency in New York City that follows Yevamot 62b. Sure, this Vietnamese couple made their argument; nonetheless, was someone also trying to appease the Haredim?

"Our Rabbis taught: Concerning a man who loves his wife as himself, who honours her more than himself, who guides his sons and daughters in the right path and arranges for them to be married near the period of their puberty, Scripture says, And thou shalt know that thy tent is in peace.49  Concerning him who loves his neighbours, who befriends his relatives, marries his sister's50  daughter,"

Incidentally enough, I had no clue that it was that specific. I just knew about the reference. Anyway, don't kid yourself; the Haredim have a very-strong presence in New York City (e.g., Williamsburg, Crown Heights). By the way, the decision reads in part:

There is no comparably strong objection to uncle-niece marriages. Indeed, until 1893 marriages between uncle and niece or aunt and nephew, of the whole or half blood, were lawful in New York. And sixty years after the prohibition was enacted we affirmed, in May, a judgment recognizing as valid a marriage between a half-uncle and half-niece that was entered into in Rhode Island and permitted by Rhode Island law. It seems from the Appellate Division’s reasoning in May that the result would have been the same even if a full uncle and full niece had been involved. Thus Domestic Relations Law § 5(3) has not been viewed as expressing strong condemnation of uncle-niece and aunt-nephew relationships.

I wonder, too, if that's why some Haredim immigrated to New York. They may not have been literate in haleshonot l'goyim, though they still knew what was going on. Remember that back in Krasne nad Krasnopol, Wojciech and Marianna Krusznyska Danilowicz were smart enough to claim negligence in baptizing Katarzyna—by the way, Jews did use and even adopt shemot hagoyim; though I'm not sure if we'll ever know the real names of "Katarzyna" et. al.. "Marianna" is probably the one real name, though, since that's "Miryam Chanah".

As for their cousin Rochla (and I'm definitely not fooled in light of this, since Aleksandria listed Katarzyna as her in-law mother and nearest relative, even though they were not talking to each other after Julian and Aleksandra became Anusim), she came to New York with enough English literacy (or maybe she talked to a customs official who could speak Yiddish) to get into New York (Her aunt had to pick her up; so, who knows?).

By the way, all of Great-Granddad's families stuck together in Northumberland County, PA, too (Look it up. If you're too, quite honestly, lazy to do it, I'll give you the names and links to searches for "Czarnecki", etc.; "Danilowicz", etc.; "Andrulewicz". etc.; and "Margiewicz", etc.. Otherwise, you're on your own from there. I've proved myself enough—and I don't need that "Both sets of parents?" argument again, since Alexandria gave her parents' name as "Antoni" and "Katarzyna" as well. As far as I know, that neither is my fault nor was the fault of Great-Grandaunt Alice. I didn't even know that Great-Granddad's parents were here—let alone Crypto Jews who escaped the pogroms—until I was close to 20 years old, and she was simply writing what her mother told her to write. So, I wouldn't even be counted in an Israeli Census before then, and she was a bat chayil.

Anyway, back to my point (since I just needed to say all that in case I would get the "That's not enough evidence," "That's coincidence," etc. arguments): since Haredim are (as I must mention, in case one didn't know that Haredim are) very much a constituency in New York City (and, thus, New York State) and knew enough to immigrate to the "treif medina", could they somehow have played into "Nguyen v. Holder" (2014), even if quietly? After all, I perhaps would darned well consider that if I were a Second Circuit Court judge—especially if I wanted to get reappointed, and even someday appointed to the Supreme Court (As is known, elective politics plays even into appointive politics.).

Let's not be fooled: if (and since) Katarzyna's parents could (so to speak) pull strings to be under-the-radar Anusim, and Rochla knew enough to get into New York, the Haredim could and do know enough to (at least if they wanted) play into a gentile case that has implications for Haredi Jewish tradition.

Let me conclude one incidental observation as well: "Antoni" and "Katarzyna" seem to be to Poland as "Juan" and "Maria" are to Mexico.

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Third Warning, Cockeysville...

If you try to come back again, you will be prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Note that I am looking into prosecution options as I type.


Friday, April 18, 2014

Warning #2 To Cockeysville....

As I stated, be assured that I will take swift and sufficient legal action. As I discussed:

Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-304 (2010)—Because of another's race, color,
religious beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, disability, or national origin, or because
another is homeless, a person may not: (1) (i) commit a crime or attempt to
commit a crime against that person; (ii) damage the real or personal property of
that person; (iii) deface, damage, or destroy, or attempt to deface, damage, or
destroy the real or personal property of that person; or (iv) burn or attempt to
burn an object on the real or personal property of that person; or (2) commit a
violation of item (1) of this section that: (i) except as provided in item (ii) of this
item, involves a separate crime that is a felony; or (ii) results in the death of the

Therefore, I hope that you think really carefully before you read this blog again. Cyberstalking, cyberbullying, and using a person's condition against him or her is a felony. As I've stated, think twice or I will take swift and sufficient legal action. You've already tried to use my beliefs against me (as I noted re the hate acts disguised as historical education); you are now trying to use my mental condition, and you're only adding to the list of potential charges that may soon become actual charges against you.

Cockeysville, Maryland arrived from on "The Nicole Factor: OCD".
00:03:35 -- 21 minutes ago

Monday, April 14, 2014

For Cyberstalking And Cyberbullying, Lutherville Was Already Put On Notice; And....

I surely hope that I don't have to prosecute whoever is in Cockeysville and trying to do what whomever was in Lutherville tried to do. If the need arises, I will do what I warned Lutherville that I might do. The sad part is that I even know who the " Cockeysville" is, and he or she had better knock off doing what Lutherville did really quickly. As I warned Lutherville in explicit and certain terms:

 [K]now that you are committing a hate crime according to Maryland law, and I advised a friend to take legal action against an Anti-Messianic group who was breaking the law by harassing his or her group:
Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-303 (2010)—A person may not, by force or threat of  force, obstruct or attempt to obstruct another in the free exercise of that person’s
Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-304 (2010)—Because of another's race, color,
religious beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, disability, or national origin, or because
another is homeless, a person may not: (1) (i) commit a crime or attempt to
commit a crime against that person; (ii) damage the real or personal property of
that person; (iii) deface, damage, or destroy, or attempt to deface, damage, or
destroy the real or personal property of that person; or (iv) burn or attempt to
burn an object on the real or personal property of that person; or (2) commit a
violation of item (1) of this section that: (i) except as provided in item (ii) of this
item, involves a separate crime that is a felony; or (ii) results in the death of the
Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-307 (2010)—A hate crime sentence imposed under
this subtitle may be separate from and consecutive to or concurrent with a
sentence for any crime based on the act establishing the violation of this subtitle.
Therefore, I hope that you think twice. As I stated, don't think that you're being cute or clever by visiting this blog—and perhaps even disguising your location—in order to do evil against me. You will find yourself in legal trouble if you keep coming here in order to try to (and don't think that I don't know that you might be or are trying to), for example:
  1. Collect data to use against me—e.g., twist or otherwise misrepresent what I said.
  2. Collect data to use against people in my life, in my family, etc.
  3. Intimidate and/or silence me by knowing that your visit will be recorded on Feedjit, and thinking that I will suddenly be afraid to blog because of you.
If you don't believe me, keep looking through my blog—you will see that I have even documented right on this blog when others have tried to be cute or clever in doing evil against me.

Given who Cockeysville is, I know that that's part of what he or she is doing. To make a long story short, this particular person got especially upset when I questioned what one of his or her associates was doing in taking part in a hate act which is disguised as a legitimate form of historical education—and which quite a few of its participants well know is not at all a legitimate form of historical education, no matter how they try to justify it as such. An example of such a kind of act can be read on Civil War Memory's forum—as for the associate's specific act, I will not delve into that (I don't want to give Cockeysville anything to twist against me.).

Also, as far as I know, Lutherville at least took my warning seriously. Cockeysville had better do the same. As the Miranda Warning reads [with my emphasis here]:

"“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you?”"

Lutherville, as I stated, has since left me alone; and Cockeysville had better follow Lutherville's example. After all, I also have evidence against Cockeysville; and this is the most-recent wave of it:

Cockeysville, Maryland left via from "The Nicole Factor: Wikipedia"
22:48:34 -- 39 minutes ago
22:46:13 -- 41 minutes ago
Cockeysville, Maryland left via from "The Nicole Factor"
22:38:57 -- 49 minutes ago
Cockeysville, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
22:37:20 -- 50 minutes ago
Boston, Massachusetts arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
22:18:44 -- 1 hour 9 mins ago
21:53:41 -- 1 hour 34 mins ago
21:53:06 -- 1 hour 35 mins ago
21:52:37 -- 1 hour 35 mins ago
21:52:06 -- 1 hour 36 mins ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
21:16:04 -- 2 hours 12 mins ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
20:14:42 -- 3 hours 13 mins ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
19:39:39 -- 3 hours 48 mins ago
17:44:40 -- 5 hours 43 mins ago
Curitiba, Parana arrived from on "The Nicole Factor".
16:31:54 -- 6 hours 56 mins ago
15:41:42 -- 7 hours 46 mins ago
Romford, Havering left via from "The Nicole Factor"
15:31:31 -- 7 hours 56 mins ago
Romford, Havering arrived from on "The Nicole Factor".
15:31:26 -- 7 hours 56 mins ago
Chicago, Illinois arrived from on "The Nicole Factor: Jewish".
14:57:53 -- 8 hours 30 mins ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
13:27:05 -- 10 hours 1 min ago
Nottingham, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
12:47:39 -- 10 hours 40 mins ago
09:19:45 -- 14 hours 8 mins ago
07:50:21 -- 15 hours 37 mins ago
Romford, Havering arrived from on "The Nicole Factor".
07:04:11 -- 16 hours 23 mins ago
05:21:49 -- 18 hours 6 mins ago
Albuquerque, New Mexico arrived from on "The Nicole Factor: Toby Keith's Mistress Identified?".
03:38:56 -- 19 hours 49 mins ago
02:47:21 -- 20 hours 40 mins ago
Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania arrived from on "The Nicole Factor: September 2013" by searching for yitzhak nates chico rabbi.
23:53:44 -- 23 hours 34 mins ago
Nottingham, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
21:50:11 -- 1 day 1 hour ago
Romford, Havering left via from "The Nicole Factor"
21:30:27 -- 1 day 1 hour ago
Romford, Havering arrived from on "The Nicole Factor".
21:30:19 -- 1 day 1 hour ago
20:49:18 -- 1 day 2 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
17:08:23 -- 1 day 6 hours ago
Boston, Massachusetts arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
15:27:06 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
15:26:54 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland left via from "The Nicole Factor"
14:58:59 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
14:58:38 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
14:53:46 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland left via from "The Nicole Factor"
13:48:48 -- 1 day 9 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
13:46:21 -- 1 day 9 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland left via from "The Nicole Factor"
13:03:07 -- 1 day 10 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
13:02:34 -- 1 day 10 hours ago
Cockeysville, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
12:07:37 -- 1 day 11 hours ago
09:40:31 -- 1 day 13 hours ago
08:53:06 -- 1 day 14 hours ago
Romford, Havering arrived from on "The Nicole Factor".
07:20:35 -- 1 day 16 hours ago
05:07:50 -- 1 day 18 hours ago
05:07:46 -- 1 day 18 hours ago

Let me say, also, that Cockeysville has even tried to do the same to me on other media besides my blog. By the way, follower bloggers need to take note:

Just because a person (whether he or she is a blogger or not) says or does something that someone else may not like (whether online or offline) does not give the disliker the right to commit crimes against (e.g., bully—e.g., stalk, intimidate, slander) the person whose words and/or actions (including online words and actions—e.g., a blog entry, a sharing of a meme) he or she dislikes. Even if the person would create and/or disseminate something as egregious as hate content, the disliker of the content has no right to commit crimes against the person who create and/or disseminates the content. The disliker, meanwhile, can simply choose to ignore the content or even report it as to do so is necessary.

For example, as much as I hate the Kitty Mansfield page on Facebook (and I did, to [so far] no avail, report it to Facebook), I have no right to commit any criminal acts against Kitty Mansfield and those who like her page (Meanwhile, Facebook will hopefully realize that the Kitty Mansfield page does fall under the category of "Sexually explicit content". Thankfully, Facebook has revised some of their decisions before.).

The same goes with Lutherville (who learned his or her lesson) and Cockeysville on the flip side of the coin; and if it doesn't in Cockeysville's case, Cockeysville will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.