.gif)
I surely hope that I don't have to prosecute whoever is in Cockeysville and trying to do what whomever was in Lutherville tried to do. If the need arises, I will do what I warned Lutherville that I might do. The sad part is that I even know who the "whoever...in Cockeysville" is, and he or she had better knock off doing what Lutherville did really quickly. As I warned Lutherville in explicit and certain terms:
Given who Cockeysville is, I know that that's part of what he or she is doing. To make a long story short, this particular person got especially upset when I questioned what one of his or her associates was doing in taking part in a hate act which is disguised as a legitimate form of historical education—and which quite a few of its participants well know is not at all a legitimate form of historical education, no matter how they try to justify it as such. An example of such a kind of act can be read on Civil War Memory's forum—as for the associate's specific act, I will not delve into that (I don't want to give Cockeysville anything to twist against me.).
Also, as far as I know, Lutherville at least took my warning seriously. Cockeysville had better do the same. As the Miranda Warning reads [with my emphasis here]:
Lutherville, as I stated, has since left me alone; and Cockeysville had better follow Lutherville's example. After all, I also have evidence against Cockeysville; and this is the most-recent wave of it:
Let me say, also, that Cockeysville has even tried to do the same to me on other media besides my blog. By the way, follower bloggers need to take note:
Just because a person (whether he or she is a blogger or not) says or does something that someone else may not like (whether online or offline) does not give the disliker the right to commit crimes against (e.g., bully—e.g., stalk, intimidate, slander) the person whose words and/or actions (including online words and actions—e.g., a blog entry, a sharing of a meme) he or she dislikes. Even if the person would create and/or disseminate something as egregious as hate content, the disliker of the content has no right to commit crimes against the person who create and/or disseminates the content. The disliker, meanwhile, can simply choose to ignore the content or even report it as to do so is necessary.
For example, as much as I hate the Kitty Mansfield page on Facebook (and I did, to [so far] no avail, report it to Facebook), I have no right to commit any criminal acts against Kitty Mansfield and those who like her page (Meanwhile, Facebook will hopefully realize that the Kitty Mansfield page does fall under the category of "Sexually explicit content". Thankfully, Facebook has revised some of their decisions before.).
The same goes with Lutherville (who learned his or her lesson) and Cockeysville on the flip side of the coin; and if it doesn't in Cockeysville's case, Cockeysville will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
[K]now that you are committing a hate crime according to Maryland law, and I advised a friend to take legal action against an Anti-Messianic group who was breaking the law by harassing his or her group:
Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-303 (2010)—A person may not, by force or threat of force, obstruct or attempt to obstruct another in the free exercise of that person’sMd. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-304 (2010)—Because of another's race, color,
religious beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, disability, or national origin, or because
another is homeless, a person may not: (1) (i) commit a crime or attempt to
commit a crime against that person; (ii) damage the real or personal property of
that person; (iii) deface, damage, or destroy, or attempt to deface, damage, or
destroy the real or personal property of that person; or (iv) burn or attempt to
burn an object on the real or personal property of that person; or (2) commit a
violation of item (1) of this section that: (i) except as provided in item (ii) of this
item, involves a separate crime that is a felony; or (ii) results in the death of the
victim.
Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-307 (2010)—A hate crime sentence imposed under
this subtitle may be separate from and consecutive to or concurrent with a
sentence for any crime based on the act establishing the violation of this subtitle.
Therefore, I hope that you think twice. As I stated, don't think that you're being cute or clever by visiting this blog—and perhaps even disguising your location—in order to do evil against me. You will find yourself in legal trouble if you keep coming here in order to try to (and don't think that I don't know that you might be or are trying to), for example:If you don't believe me, keep looking through my blog—you will see that I have even documented right on this blog when others have tried to be cute or clever in doing evil against me.
- Collect data to use against me—e.g., twist or otherwise misrepresent what I said.
- Collect data to use against people in my life, in my family, etc.
- Intimidate and/or silence me by knowing that your visit will be recorded on Feedjit, and thinking that I will suddenly be afraid to blog because of you.
Given who Cockeysville is, I know that that's part of what he or she is doing. To make a long story short, this particular person got especially upset when I questioned what one of his or her associates was doing in taking part in a hate act which is disguised as a legitimate form of historical education—and which quite a few of its participants well know is not at all a legitimate form of historical education, no matter how they try to justify it as such. An example of such a kind of act can be read on Civil War Memory's forum—as for the associate's specific act, I will not delve into that (I don't want to give Cockeysville anything to twist against me.).
Also, as far as I know, Lutherville at least took my warning seriously. Cockeysville had better do the same. As the Miranda Warning reads [with my emphasis here]:
"“You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can and will be used against you in a court of law. You have the right to an attorney. If you cannot afford an attorney, one will be provided for you. Do you understand the rights I have just read to you?”"
Lutherville, as I stated, has since left me alone; and Cockeysville had better follow Lutherville's example. After all, I also have evidence against Cockeysville; and this is the most-recent wave of it:
22:48:34 -- 39 minutes ago
Cockeysville, Maryland left via en.wikipedia.org from "The Nicole Factor: Pending "Andrulewicz Family" Wikipedia Article"
22:46:13 -- 41 minutes ago
22:38:57 -- 49 minutes ago
Cockeysville, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
22:37:20 -- 50 minutes ago
Boston, Massachusetts arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
22:18:44 -- 1 hour 9 mins ago
Simi Valley, California arrived on "The Nicole Factor: The DNA Results Actually Only Solidify That...".
21:53:41 -- 1 hour 34 mins ago
Simi Valley, California arrived on "The Nicole Factor: The DNA Results Actually Only Solidify That...".
21:53:06 -- 1 hour 35 mins ago
Simi Valley, California arrived on "The Nicole Factor: The DNA Results Actually Only Solidify That...".
21:52:37 -- 1 hour 35 mins ago
Simi Valley, California arrived on "The Nicole Factor: The DNA Results Actually Only Solidify That...".
21:52:06 -- 1 hour 36 mins ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
21:16:04 -- 2 hours 12 mins ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
20:14:42 -- 3 hours 13 mins ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
19:39:39 -- 3 hours 48 mins ago
Salem, Massachusetts arrived from bing.com on "The Nicole Factor: "[I]s greg gutfeld and his wife getting a divorce"?" by searching for greg gutfeld divorce.
17:44:40 -- 5 hours 43 mins ago
Topeka, Kansas arrived from google.com on "The Nicole Factor: Natalie Wood Wagner Was Jewish? And If So, Her Story's Not Much Different Than Mine...".
17:31:00 -- 5 hours 57 mins ago
16:31:54 -- 6 hours 56 mins ago
San Francisco, California arrived from google.com on "The Nicole Factor: And the Problem With Being Spiritual Is? Tracey R. Rich Is A Classical P'rushit Chauvinist...".
15:41:42 -- 7 hours 46 mins ago
15:31:31 -- 7 hours 56 mins ago
15:31:26 -- 7 hours 56 mins ago
14:57:53 -- 8 hours 30 mins ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
13:27:05 -- 10 hours 1 min ago
Nottingham, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
12:47:39 -- 10 hours 40 mins ago
Amsterdam, Noord-Holland arrived on "The Nicole Factor: The Statute of Limitations For Rape May've Expired for Natalie Wood, But Who Else Has Kirk Douglas Raped?".
12:15:20 -- 11 hours 12 mins ago
Waitara, New South Wales arrived on "The Nicole Factor: "Why Is the Internet Full of Afrocentric Rubbish?"".
09:19:45 -- 14 hours 8 mins ago
Jacksonville, Florida arrived from google.com on "The Nicole Factor: "[I]s greg gutfeld and his wife getting a divorce"?".
07:50:21 -- 15 hours 37 mins ago
07:04:11 -- 16 hours 23 mins ago
Brooklyn, New York arrived from google.com on "The Nicole Factor: My Own Answer To "What Does the Douglas Family Say About Natalie Wood?"".
05:21:49 -- 18 hours 6 mins ago
Albuquerque, New Mexico arrived from google.com on "The Nicole Factor: Toby Keith's Mistress Identified?".
03:38:56 -- 19 hours 49 mins ago
Mountain View, California arrived from google.com on "The Nicole Factor: "First World Problems": Some Are Actually Legitimate Problems".
02:47:21 -- 20 hours 40 mins ago
Bala Cynwyd, Pennsylvania arrived from bing.com on "The Nicole Factor: September 2013" by searching for yitzhak nates chico rabbi.
23:53:44 -- 23 hours 34 mins ago
Nottingham, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
21:50:11 -- 1 day 1 hour ago
21:30:27 -- 1 day 1 hour ago
21:30:19 -- 1 day 1 hour ago
Sarver, Pennsylvania arrived from google.com on "The Nicole Factor: "Who Is Andrew Sandubrae's Mother In Oklahoma?"".
20:49:18 -- 1 day 2 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
17:08:23 -- 1 day 6 hours ago
Boston, Massachusetts arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
15:27:06 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
Brooklyn, New York arrived from t.co on "The Nicole Factor: Repost: Blacks, DNA Haplotype Groups, Jews, and Khazars".
15:26:54 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
14:58:59 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
14:58:38 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
Odessa, Odes'ka Oblast' arrived from google.com.ua on "The Nicole Factor: Pending "Andrulewicz Family" Wikipedia Article".
14:53:46 -- 1 day 8 hours ago
13:48:48 -- 1 day 9 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
13:46:21 -- 1 day 9 hours ago
13:03:07 -- 1 day 10 hours ago
Gaithersburg, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
13:02:34 -- 1 day 10 hours ago
Cockeysville, Maryland arrived on "The Nicole Factor".
12:07:37 -- 1 day 11 hours ago
Dhaka arrived from google.com on "The Nicole Factor: My Second And final DateMySchool Profile, And...".
09:40:31 -- 1 day 13 hours ago
08:53:06 -- 1 day 14 hours ago
07:20:35 -- 1 day 16 hours ago
Araranguá, Santa Catarina left via seriousdeals.net from "The Nicole Factor: "What's the difference between Jews, Christians, and Catholics?""
05:07:50 -- 1 day 18 hours ago
Araranguá, Santa Catarina arrived on "The Nicole Factor: "What's the difference between Jews, Christians, and Catholics?"".
05:07:46 -- 1 day 18 hours ago
Auckland arrived from google.co.nz on "The Nicole Factor: And the Problem With Being Spiritual Is? Tracey R. Rich Is A Classical P'rushit Chauvinist...".
03:31:45 -- 1 day 19 hours ago
Let me say, also, that Cockeysville has even tried to do the same to me on other media besides my blog. By the way, follower bloggers need to take note:
Just because a person (whether he or she is a blogger or not) says or does something that someone else may not like (whether online or offline) does not give the disliker the right to commit crimes against (e.g., bully—e.g., stalk, intimidate, slander) the person whose words and/or actions (including online words and actions—e.g., a blog entry, a sharing of a meme) he or she dislikes. Even if the person would create and/or disseminate something as egregious as hate content, the disliker of the content has no right to commit crimes against the person who create and/or disseminates the content. The disliker, meanwhile, can simply choose to ignore the content or even report it as to do so is necessary.
For example, as much as I hate the Kitty Mansfield page on Facebook (and I did, to [so far] no avail, report it to Facebook), I have no right to commit any criminal acts against Kitty Mansfield and those who like her page (Meanwhile, Facebook will hopefully realize that the Kitty Mansfield page does fall under the category of "Sexually explicit content". Thankfully, Facebook has revised some of their decisions before.).
The same goes with Lutherville (who learned his or her lesson) and Cockeysville on the flip side of the coin; and if it doesn't in Cockeysville's case, Cockeysville will be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.
No comments:
Post a Comment