The Nicole Factor: Hey, Lutherville, Who Are You? I Watch My Blog Traffic Carefully, And...

Saturday, February 1, 2014

Hey, Lutherville, Who Are You? I Watch My Blog Traffic Carefully, And...

Now I'm beginning to be afraid. As far as I know, you haven't left a comment on this blog, etc.. I hope that you're not someone like Emily Katz Boling or someone—if you are, I (so to speak) buried that hatchet a long time ago. Also, your cyberbullying and Becca Borland's cyberbullying was quite public. I forgive and let go, and I also don't forget. So (again, if you are Emily—or if you're Becca or someone like that), you stay away from this blog. You are out of my life; I graduated UMBC; I was done with Hillel last semester (You didn't see me come back once, did you?), and the feelings between us are quite mutual (as far as I know)—you don't like me; I am quite wary of you, and I am not willing to dig up old hatchets unless I have to do so to defend myself or to show that I've dropped a hatchet which I've used wrongly (Keep in mind that the hatchet is figurative, and I'm not exactly sure what a hatchet is—I am not a weapons-type person at all.).

If you're one of my exes, then you really stay away. I thought that having to call the police on you would send the message—and people can say that I'm paranoid; and I'm nonetheless smart enough to know that someone sitting in (for example) Glen Burnie can change his or her location on his or her Google page to "Baltimore". Speaking of Glen Burnie, really get out of my life if you're Greg or Uncle Gary—you have made clear that Pop-Pop was such a great man, e.g. (Oh yeah; I'll admit that I browse your Facebook profiles from time to time to see what you're up to—and I would not be surprised if you browsed mine.). There are also other things about which I know and/or have memories, but I am being generous by not naming those things.

If you're that "Anonymous" person who was defending Krystal Keith (and you said that you neither like nor dislike her), get a life. You always left your comments as "Anonymous", as I recall, anyway. On the other hand, you stay out of my life, too, if you're Krystal Keith and trying to be cute and clever, Mrs. Sandubrae—by the way, last time that I checked out of sheer curiousity, you had only 8,000-something followers even though you're verified on Twitter. As the New Testament says, "Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap."

If you're anybody else who could be or is up to evil against me (and I could name others), know that I don't put up with stalking drek (as Mrs. Sandubrae has learned, since I documented 28 pages worth of her and her cohorts bullying me—27 of them with her trying to be cute and intimidate me by visiting my blog). I will document your visits if I need to do so (and know that I copied and pasted my updated Feedjit statistics as I typed this blog entry). You, like Mrs. Sandubrae, may think that you're being cute and/or clever by coming to this blog to see what I'm up to, etc.—and you are not.

Cyberbullying and cyberstalking are not cute; they are not clever, and they are certainly not something for which you ever want to be exposed. As I said just in case you are "Anonymous" or Mrs. Sandubrae, get a life! If you don't like this blog, you don't even have to visit it—use common sense!

By the way, I suspect—or even know—that you hate Messianic Jews (I know that you visited "Messianic Jews doing it wrong"'s website.). So, really, get a life—I am not bothering you by believing in a Jewish man as the Jewish Messiah. Also let me reiterate that you don't even have to visit this blog if you don't like it.

In addition, I have no adversity to taking legal action against you—in fact, if you are an Anti-Messianic type, know that you are committing a hate crime according to Maryland law, and I advised a friend to take legal action against an Anti-Messianic group who was breaking the law by harassing his or her group:

Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-303 (2010)—A person may not, by force or threat of
force, obstruct or attempt to obstruct another in the free exercise of that person’s
religious beliefs.
Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-304 (2010)—Because of another's race, color,
religious beliefs, sexual orientation, gender, disability, or national origin, or because
another is homeless, a person may not: (1) (i) commit a crime or attempt to
commit a crime against that person; (ii) damage the real or personal property of
that person; (iii) deface, damage, or destroy, or attempt to deface, damage, or
destroy the real or personal property of that person; or (iv) burn or attempt to
burn an object on the real or personal property of that person; or (2) commit a
violation of item (1) of this section that: (i) except as provided in item (ii) of this
item, involves a separate crime that is a felony; or (ii) results in the death of the
victim.
Md. Code Ann., Crim. Law § 10-307 (2010)—A hate crime sentence imposed under
this subtitle may be separate from and consecutive to or concurrent with a
sentence for any crime based on the act establishing the violation of this subtitle.

Therefore, I hope that you think twice. As I stated, don't think that you're being cute or clever by visiting this blog—and perhaps even disguising your location—in order to do evil against me. You will find yourself in legal trouble if you keep coming here in order to try to (and don't think that I don't know that you might be or are trying to), for example:

Collect data to use against me—e.g., twist or otherwise misrepresent what I said.
Collect data to use against people in my life, in my family, etc.
Intimidate and/or silence me by knowing that your visit will be recorded on Feedjit, and thinking that I will suddenly be afraid to blog because of you.

If you don't believe me, keep looking through my blog—you will see that I have even documented right on this blog when others have tried to be cute or clever in doing evil against me.