The "Nicole Factor" Is Online

Welcome to the Nicole Factor at blogspot.com.

Twitter

Messianic Bible (As If the Bible Isn't)

Google and FOX News

Loading...

About Me

My Photo
My blog is "The Nicole Factor" on Blogspot, my Facebook page "Nicole Czarnecki aka Nickidewbear", and YouTube and Twitter accounts "Nickidewbear."

Find Me on Google+

Share This (If You Want)

Sunday, June 16, 2013

How Far Does Anti-Liberalism Conservatism Really Go? (Originally For My Class)

“Conservatism’s re-birth was mainly due to a negative reaction to the political and cultural radicalism of the 60s combined with a negative reaction to liberal programs dating as far back as the New Deal (or perhaps even the Progressive Era).” Should that statement perhaps even read “Conservatism’s Second Rebirth was mainly due to a negative reaction to the political and cultural radicalism of the 60s combined with a negative reaction to liberal programs dating as far back as the New Deal (or perhaps even the Progressive Era, possibly even the Post-Reconstruction Era or further back—although ‘conservative’ was ‘liberal’, and vice versa).”? I have seen some argue that because Edmund Burke founded Conservatism, those who were Conservatives in Burke’s time (the last years of the 1700s) and the 1900s were the real Liberals (Classical Liberals in the 19th Century. Someone on Twitter even admonished another tweeter for letting the Democratic Party “hijack” the word “liberal”.).
I myself am a Republican—which is not very usual for a Jew (even a Jewish Christian, for Jewish Christians like Susan Perlman have been both “politically liberal yet theologically conservative Jew[s] for Jesus”.[1]) Part of that is because (as Wayne Dupree, a Black Democrat-turned-Republican politico often tweets), “Republicans Proudly Disclose Abolitionist roots on it’s [sic.] website, Democrats Ignore Slave Agenda on theirs”[2]. Andrew Jackson even, for example, was Anti Native and Anti Black. Abraham Lincoln (who himself may have been a believing kohen[3]) freed the slaves, although he was not sure that Blacks and Whites[4] could live together. So, the contrast reaches as far back as Conservatism or Classical Liberalism was founded.
Therefore, I think that the real reaction lies in that Conservatives/Classical Liberals have always taken to heart about themselves and everyone else what Ronald Reagan once stated about specifically Hispanics—as Geraldo Rivera, albeit a Liberal (Classical Conservative) Republican, constantly points out (given that he’s a Jewish Hispanic whose dad was Puerto Rican and whose mom is Ashkenazic Jewish, and two of his influences were César Chávez and Jacob Javitts—both Republicans). “They’re Republicans; they just don’t know it yet. In other words, a Conservatives/Classical Liberal—whether White, Black, Latino, Jewish, Asian, etc.—will generally hold and eventually backlash anything that’s not, for example:
1.      Anti-Racism Values (e.g., Jackson hated Natives, FDR[5] and Kennedy[6] Jews, and LBJ Blacks[7]).
2.      Theologically-conservative values—e.g., John Podhoretz and his late sister Rachel Podhoretz Abrams, Bill Kristol, Tony Katz, and Gabriella Hoffman (who, also in contrast to Susan Perlman, is Catholic) are all Zionists—though, e.g., Rachel Abrams was Conservative/Masorti/USCJ[8] and Bill Kristol is Reform[9]. Gabriella Hoffman, as I recall from having talked to her, considers herself a Pro-Israel Christian with a Jewish dad but not Jewish herself.
3.      Communism. IMDB[10] actually reads about Irving Kristol, Bill Kristol’s dad, “Along with his wife, whom he met at a Trotskyist meeting, he spearheaded the neo-conservatism movement of the late 1960s. He defined "neo-conservatism" as a political and intellectual philosophy for disaffected liberals who had been "mugged by reality.".” So, Irving Kristol is an example of a Brooklyn Reform Jewish kid who was Far Left and became Conservative due to a distaste with Communism to which he once adhered. 

So, again, I propose that the statement reads “Conservatism’s Second Rebirth was mainly due to a negative reaction to the political and cultural radicalism of the 60s combined with a negative reaction to liberal programs dating as far back as the New Deal (or perhaps even the Progressive Era, possibly even the Post-Reconstruction Era or further back—although ‘conservative’ was ‘liberal’, and vice versa).” After all, Conservatives/Classical Liberals forefronted the Abolition and Civil Rights Movements, stopping the Holocaust[11] and promoting Zionism, and being Anti Communism.



[3] His granddad was named Abraham as he was, and Ashkenazi Jews are often named for deceased relatives. I noticed his family tree on Ancestry.com and caught that pattern. So, I Googled “Abraham Lincoln Jewish”. His Hebrew name, is Avraham Lin-Cohen HaKohen ben-Toma-ben-Avraham-ben-Yohanahn HaKohen v’Rivkah. Rebecca Lincoln’s ethnicity was not identified, but a kohen—even a Crypto-Jewish one—would not marry gentiles in those days. I had also heard that Abraham Lincoln was Jewish before, but possibly through his mother if so. That Abraham Lincoln was (probably) Jewish explains a lot—e.g., his desire to visit Jerusalem—maybe a be a yishuv?
[4] Or maybe really Blacks and Jews. See footnote above and, e.g., Acts 13:1, Song 1:5-6, Jeremiah 13:23, and Numbers 12. Long story short, even the New Covenant didn’t quickly heal over Black-Jewish tensions. By the way, whether Simeon called “Niger” is the proselyte—or ger tzedek—eunuch that Philip preached to (cf. Acts 8) is not known—and that’s actually the first time that I thought of that. Simeon could’ve also been an Early Lemba or Falasha Jew (since “Ethiopia” or “Kush” refers to all of Sub-Saharan Africa and does not distinguish between Zimbabweans, Ethiopians, etc.).
[8] She attended Ansche Chesed (USCJ), according to her obituary. The USCJ does not the inerrancy of Tanakh, although it broke away from Reform Judaism (HUAC/URJ) to be more conservative on Talmudic halakhah, including Zionism (which is also a Tanakh-held value).
[10] Who does a very-careful verification process. In fact, their policy reads, “Your updates have been sent to the IMDb data editors for review. If they're approved, they will normally appear on the site within the next 1-14 days. For specific details about this and a more current estimate of processing times, check the processing times page. For questions on the submission process we recommend visiting the IMDb Get Satisfaction community message board. There are also a number of helpful resources in the Contributor Zone.”
[11] E.g., Holocaust survivor Tibor Geza Rusznyak (1923-2006) converted to Catholicism and became a Republican when he immigrated from Kassa, Hungary (Košice, Slovakia). György “George Soros” Schwarz was a devout National Socialist kapo and remains on the Far Left today, in stark contrast to Tibor—who went as far as to be cremated when he died in 2006, since he felt guilt about surviving the Holocaust (See http://search.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/sse.dll?rank=1&sbo=t&gsbco=Sweden&gsln=Rusznyak&gss=angs-c&pcat=34&h=7174133&recoff=12+57&db=ohdeath93-98&indiv=1 and, for a similar account, http://www.jta.org/2010/01/24/life-religion/survivor-who-testified-at-nuremberg-eichmann-trials-dies.). 

Saturday, June 15, 2013

"Man Of Constant Sorrow"--Work of Fiction Based On the Song Lyrics and Covers From the Soggy Bottom Boys and Charm City Devils

This is a work of fiction. Names, characters, places and incidents either are products of the author’s imagination or are used fictitiously. Any resemblance to actual events or locales or persons, living or dead, is entirely coincidental. (Disclaimer copied and pasted from TVTropes.org)

©2013 Nicole Czarnecki. All rights reserved by the author. "Man Of Constant Sorrow" is listed as "Traditional" and written from 1888-1913 according to Wikipedia, and thus has no copyright date or has an expired copyright. The cover by the Soggy Bottom Boys was copyrighted in 2002, and the cover by the Charm City Devils in 2012. The lyrics are in the public domain.

The author has done thorough- and accurate-research, and used prior knowledge to the best of her knowledge and ability.

Lyrics taken from http://www.lyricsmode.com/lyrics/s/soggy_bottom_boys/i_am_a_man_of_constant_sorrow.html at the time of the writing of this work. 

A reference list of sources used for specific information (not common-knowledge, general, non-copyrightable or public-domain information*) at the time of this writing can be found at the end of this work. (*e.g., language is not copyrightable)


(In constant sorrow all through his days)

I am a man of constant sorrow
I've seen trouble all my days
I bid farewell to old Kentucky
The place where I was born and raised

(The place where he was born and raised)

For six long years I've been in trouble
No pleasure here on Earth I found
For in this world I'm bound to ramble
I have no friends to help me now

(He has no friends to help him now)

It's fare-thee-well my old true lover
I never expect to see you again
For I'm bound to ride that northern railroad
Perhaps I'll die upon this train

(Perhaps he'll die upon this train)

You can bury me in some deep valley
For many years where I may lay
And you may learn to love another
While I am sleeping in my grave

(While he is sleeping in his grave)

Maybe your friends think I'm just a stranger
My face you never will see no more
But there is one promise that is given
I'll meet you on God's golden shore

(He'll meet you on God's golden shore)

Chapter 1

"Out; out!" they screamed. And that was that--Kehillath Kodesh Adas Israel had kicked him out, sat shiva for him, and sent him packing. He mumbled, "You can't even get your damned Hebrew right!" So much for Liberal, or Progressive, or Tolerant, or Inclusive, or whatever-the-Hell "Judaism" they called it, anyway--besides, they had to liberalize (really, bastardize) the Hebrew, anyway: it was "Kehillat-Kodesh Adat Yisra'el", anyway. 

He was angry enough that he couldn't think clearly. How dare they deal with him in that manner! "Liberal" in zayn tuchus"Progresiv" in zayn tuchus"Tolera'nt" in zayn tuchus"Far kirev" in zayn tuchus! He wasn't a cursing man, but fury raged within him--he had been treated in such a shlekht shteyger, and he was a Levite! How dare those Yisra'elim! How dare those 'am-ha'aretz! How dare those minim!

He used the Baltimore & Ohio Railroad to catch a train as far away from Louisville as possible--to somewhere, to anywhere, and to somewhere and anywhere but Louisville. He just didn't know where. Un "Brith Sholom" in zayn tuchus--an adat-l'hab'rit-shalom surely wouldn't kick an ish l'shalom out of any "Brith Sholom"--which, to him, would still and always be "Kehillat-Kodesh Adat Yisra'el", "Holy Community of the Congregation of Israel". 

Chapter 2

40 years later, and his life had completely changed--he was born when his now-ex congregation was founded, of age when the Emancipation Proclamation was made (for Sefer-B'Midbar read "Take ye the sum of all the congregation of the children of Israel, from twenty years old and upward, by the descent from their fathers, all that are able to go forth to war in Israel."), and now of age plus a score of years. Incidentally--or perhaps not so--, he was of the same number of years as Moses when Moses' life changed--as the New Testament read, "And when he was full forty years old, it came into his heart to visit his brethren the children of Israel. And seeing one of them suffer wrong , he defended him, and avenged him that was oppressed , and smote the Egyptian: For he supposed his brethren would have understood how that God by his hand would deliver them: but they understood not."

As Moses' life had changed over the course of a day, so also did the life of this Levite. He hadn't intended to change his life overnight--or, since his conversion happened during the day and as he thus joked to himself, "overday". He took a covered wagon to Cincinnati, Ohio, and then a train to Baltimore, Maryland. Finding no church with which he was satisfied or any Hebrew Christian congregation, he worshiped alone in his home on the Jewish and the traditional Christian Sabbaths--Saturday and Sunday, although some Christians observed their Sabbath on Saturday like the Jews did.

Then one day, he received a mysterious letter: "Mister Leve, a rumor concerning you is as such--that your Jewish neighbors have spied on you, since they have suspected you to be a Hebrew Christian among them. The rumor is also that you worship alone. ' Let us hold fast the profession of our faith without wavering; (for he is faithful that promised ;) And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and to good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the day approaching .'

"Mister Leve, if you insist on worshiping in your home, then I insist that we start a congregation in your home--for I am a Hebrew Christian myself, and many establish congregations within various' congregants' homes. The rumor, by the way, continues that your former congregation is Brith Sholom of the Union of American Hebrew Congregations--which, as I have heard and as I mention incidentally, has congregants among it that called their denomination of Judaism "Liberal" or "Progressive" before the Union itself did (and I would credit them as prescient and clairvoyant in that matter if only their denomination were "liberal" and "progressive", for who can have true liberty in worship and progress in his growth of faith without first having liberty and growth in Yeshua our Messiah?")

"Therefore, I propose that we found a congregation in your home and christen it 'Kehillat-Kodesh b'Chofesh-Ha'Emet'--'Holy Congregation In Freedom of the Truth'. By the way, I have no knowledge of how fluent you are in Hebrew; so I hope that you don't mind that I transliterated and translated my Hebrew name for your congregation for you.

"Shalom b'HaShem-Yeshua Mishichenu--Peace In the Name of Jesus our Messiah."

[To be continued...]

Friday, June 14, 2013

Playing With Fire In the Name of Yeshua And In the Profession of Messianic Judaism

As a Messianic Jew, I am absolutely offended by this article. Firstly, we're not even to use titles like "Rabbi" or "Rav" but for Yeshua (cf. Matt 23:8-10). Secondly, we're under the New Covenant, no longer Torah (cf. Romans 7:4-25, Colossians 2:13-17). Yeshua came to fulfill the Torah, and Torah is mandatory only for non-believing Jews and gerim (cf. Matthew 5:17-19, Galatians 3, 4:21-31). Thirdly, in using "Rabbi" or "Rav" for Messianic pastors and requiring ourselves to be under Torah, we ourselves are falling away and agreeing with our very enemies (cf. Galatians 3:17, 5:7-12). We can't even keep Torah if we try, and good luck to those of us who try to burden ourselves with Torah (cf. Acts 15:10, Hebrews 6:4-6).

Another Petition Against Nehemia Gordon (To Which The Title Link Leads)


  1. First of all, Nehemia Gordon violates the tenets of real Karaism. For example:

    1. "Karaites consider traditional Christianity (any form of Christianity which holds that Jesus / Yehoshua has divine or semi-divine status) to be outright idol worship, in that it raises one of Elohim's creations to the level of creator, either in part or in full. Incidentally, this is precisely the view that Islam holds towards Christianity."
    2. Since Karaism holds that "traditional Christianity...[is] outright idol worship", Karaites are to "not consent unto [the Christian, whether Jewish or gentile], nor hearken unto him; neither shall thine eye pity him, neither shalt thou spare, neither shalt thou conceal him;  but thou shalt surely kill him; thy hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to draw thee away from the LORD thy God, who brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. And all Israel shall hear, and fear, and shall do no more any such wickedness as this is in the midst of thee. 
  2. Secondly, as previous petitioners wrote, "That rabbis have good things to say about A Prayer to Our Father is a moot point. That pastors have good things to say about the book is moot as well." Nehemia is profiting off of Tanakh and violations of Deuteronomy 13:9-12. "Ye shall not make with Me--gods of silver, or gods of gold, ye shall not make unto you." (Exodus 20:19)
  3. Thirdly, Nehemia is verbally abusive. Real Karaites do not verbally abuse people.
Again, Nehemia is nothing more than an abusive hypocrite and opportunist

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Petition Against Nehemia Gordon From A Group Of Non-Messianic Karaites That Even Messianics Should Sign

 I advise everyone to sign the PetitionOnline petition against Nehemia Gordon. According to what Nehemia claims is his interpretation of Scripture, he should "shalt surely kill [a Messianic Jew like me]; thy hand shall be first upon him to put him to death, and afterwards the hand of all the people. And thou shalt stone him with stones, that he die; because he hath sought to draw thee away from the LORD thy God, who brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage. " (Deuteronomy 13:10-11, JPS)

So, Nehemia is not even being consistent towards what he claims is his own interpretation of Scripture--the Karaite one. He is instead deceitfully working in church settings, etc. to attempt to turn people away from Yeshua--thus, he's using (if you will) an Anti-Messianic equivalent of the Mohammedan taqiyya. This is not a Karaite principle in any way, shape, form, manner, circumstance, or fashion.

By the way, see "The Hebrew Yeshua vs. the Greek Jesus". Nehemia is grossly inconsistent, for example. He tells people not to use Jewish tradition that is not in the Tanakh, yet he said "Kaddish" (which is not in Scripture) when his dad died and answered "No, not according to Jewish tradition" when I asked if I could name a pet after a deceased relative.

Also, remember that Nehemia verbally abused me, and he has no problem hurting others. As the petition reads,  Nehemia "is doing more harm than good. We don't care about how your works are received by pastors, rabbis and Christians. We don't care about 'fantastic reviews.' We take no stock in them. Their comments are meaningless to us. Our eyes are on you and the effects your actions are having." Nehemia is nothing more than an abusive hypocrite and opportunist. 

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Update On the Situation With Nehemia: Again, My Warning About Him Stands

I later got a very-manipulative private message from Nehemia. I will not publish the contents of that message, since the evidence here is enough. I will say that I get that hurt people hurt people (as I myself have sadly done several times), but having been hurt doesn't excuse or sanctify hurting others.

Let me also say this: someone gave Nehemia the benefit of the doubt and said that he was using the mentality of a third grader! I wish that, that were true; but that's sadly what verbal abusers want especially their victims to think. "Oh, he's just being childish, having a hard time getting his thoughts together, and unable to cope with the situation as he sees it." It's more of the act of a verbal abuser. Most kids have no clue of how abuse and hurtful certain actions can be. Adults do, and they can use those actions to try to discomfort, manipulate, and control people. Most kids are just trying to feel secure and make sense of matters. Adults, on the other hand, are trying to make others feel insecure and senseless.



MK Michael Ben-Ari: A Reflection of Anti Messianics On the Israeli Far Right (And On Any Side of the Political Spectrum In Even the Diaspora, Really)






First of all, how can a girl who is blind even call the police if she's not allowed to have Braille literature? Yad L'Achim wouldn't let her have a Braille-keypad phone to call the police--some of whom probably work with Yad L'Achim. Secondly, Michael ben-Ari is no real theologian or historian, or he would know that Tanakh speaks of a New Covenant, dam is what makes kippur-l'hanefesh, G-d is the only Mashiach/Moshiach (Redeemer/Savior), and Yeshua was a Tanakh-observant Jew who shed His own blood for His people.