|
Posts
|
|
My LinkedIn Profile
About Me
TwitThis
Messianic Bible (As If the Bible Isn't)
.gif)
Views
Tuesday, November 22, 2011
I'm Actually Surprised By How Far- and Quickly-Reaching My Blog Is...
Re My Math: Let's Recap How Jewish and gentile Dad and I Each Are Again...
So, only Great-Great-Granddad Trudniak was a gentile (as far as is known. Could I be fully Patrilineally Jewish? Maybe. But we'll eventually found out.). The rest were Anusim (Andrulewicz-Chernetski, Fosko-Rusnak, Fosko-Hanzok-- since the Foskos and Hanzoks still follow B'midbar 36--, etc.) or openly Non-Messianic Jewish (Morgiewicz/Margiewicz, Danilowicz-- except Mia, who still'd like to kill me; and I had to get the cheap shot in there--, etc.).
So, recap time (Jewish = Blue; gentile = green):
Mihal Trudniak + Ana Monkaova ==> (Mary M. Trudniak: (1/2 + 1/2) = Matrilineally Jewish) + Anthony Czarnecki, Sr. neeunknown Chernetski ==> (Jack Czarnecki: (1/4 + 1/4 + 1/2) = 3/4 mostly Patrilineally, Jewish) + Joan Gaydos ==> (Greg Czarnecki: (1/8 + 3/8 + 1/2) = 7/8, mostly Matrilineally, Jewish).
So I'm (as far as I know) 3.5/8 (Patrilineally) Jewish because Dad is almost fully Jewish. I'm 4.5/8 gentile; so I fall almost in between Ya'akov v'Esav (Patrilineally Jewish through the first Jew, Yitzchak; toshav-habrit 'im Avraham) and b'nei Ya'akov (Patrilineally Jewish through Ya'akov, son of the first Jew, Yitzchak; toshav-habrit 'im Avraham. Remember that Avraham, Sarah, Rivkah, etc. were all Ivrim, but goyim-- not being toshav-habrit 'im Avraham as was Yitzchak).
By the way, want to guess who Esav represents spiritually? Non-Messianic Jews:
So, recap time (Jewish = Blue; gentile = green):
Mihal Trudniak + Ana Monkaova ==> (Mary M. Trudniak: (1/2 + 1/2) = Matrilineally Jewish) + Anthony Czarnecki, Sr. neeunknown Chernetski ==> (Jack Czarnecki: (1/4 + 1/4 + 1/2) = 3/4 mostly Patrilineally, Jewish) + Joan Gaydos ==> (Greg Czarnecki: (1/8 + 3/8 + 1/2) = 7/8, mostly Matrilineally, Jewish).
So I'm (as far as I know) 3.5/8 (Patrilineally) Jewish because Dad is almost fully Jewish. I'm 4.5/8 gentile; so I fall almost in between Ya'akov v'Esav (Patrilineally Jewish through the first Jew, Yitzchak; toshav-habrit 'im Avraham) and b'nei Ya'akov (Patrilineally Jewish through Ya'akov, son of the first Jew, Yitzchak; toshav-habrit 'im Avraham. Remember that Avraham, Sarah, Rivkah, etc. were all Ivrim, but goyim-- not being toshav-habrit 'im Avraham as was Yitzchak).
By the way, want to guess who Esav represents spiritually? Non-Messianic Jews:
22 But the children struggled together within her; and she said, “If all is well, why am I like this?|” So she went to inquire of the LORD.
23 And the LORD said to her:
Two peoples shall be separated from your body;
One people shall be stronger than the other,
And the older shall serve the younger.”
24 So when her days were fulfilled for her to give birth, indeed there were twins in her womb.
6 But it is not that the word of God has taken no effect. For they are not all Israel who are of Israel, 7 nor are they all children because they are the seed of Abraham; but, “In Isaac your seed shall be called.”[b] 8 That is, those who are the children of the flesh, these are not the children of God; but the children of the promise are counted as the seed. 9 For this is the word of promise: “At this time I will come and Sarah shall have a son.”[c]
10 And not only this, but when Rebecca also had conceived by one man, even by our father Isaac 11 (for the children not yet being born, nor having done any good or evil, that the purpose of God according to election might stand, not of works but of Him who calls), 12 it was said to her, “The older shall serve the younger.”[d] 13 As it is written, “Jacob I have loved, but Esau I have hated.”[e]
By the way, more is explained at Hebrew4Christians; but be careful: John Parsons holds what one could call a Reform or more-liberal Conservative Messianic view. In other words, he does not believe in the inerrancy of Tanakh. Contrast him with Kahal Yeshuat Yisra'el, who do believe in the inerrancy of Tanakh and-- I believe-- who used to be Conservative-Messianic affiliated.
That Damned, Proselytizing Mormon, Frank....
He thinks that hating all of my YouTube videos, proselytizing and verbally abusing me in every singlew one of his comments, Anti Semitism, and any other intimidation and disingenuousness is going to get me to convert into Joseph Smith's Pseudo-Christian cult. He couldn't be more wrong. I am a Jewish Christian who is quite content in knowing Tanakh-Emet-- Torah, Nevi'im (none of whom were ever Mormon, by the way), Ketuvim (none of which ever included HaSefer Mormoni), and Hadashah.
By the way, I recommend John Kraukauer's "Under the Banner of Heaven". The Christian, Jewish or gentile, should not be afraid to read it-- even though Krakauer lumps in Christianity with Mormonism and vice versa. I had to read it once for a class, and I'm glad that I did.
By the way, I recommend John Kraukauer's "Under the Banner of Heaven". The Christian, Jewish or gentile, should not be afraid to read it-- even though Krakauer lumps in Christianity with Mormonism and vice versa. I had to read it once for a class, and I'm glad that I did.
Monday, November 21, 2011
The Statute of Limitations For Rape May've Expired for Natalie Wood, But Who Else Has Kirk Douglas Raped?
Back in his day, Kirk Douglas could've easily gotten the death penalty for rape, particularly child and adolescent rape. But then-16-year-old Natalie Wood was afraid to report him, and eventually went to her grave without doing so. But who else has Kirk Douglas raped in his day? He can't get the death penalty for any crimes after Coker v. Georgia (1977) and Kennedy v. Louisiana (2008), but ex-post facto applies only as it says that it does-- "ex-post facto-- after the fact". So once Coker and Kennedy came down, Douglas escaped the death penalty for any crime that he committed after each of the respective rulings were made. In other words, once the death penalty for rape was banned, it was banned for the here- or there-after.
But the question remains: since Kirk Douglas raped Natalie Wood and got away with it (before Coker and Kennedy), what did he do after Coker and Kennedy? And even since he got away with raping Natalie Wood, who else did he rape before Coker and Kennedy?
Since they can reopen the Natalie Wood drowning case, they can investigate Kirk Douglas to make sure that he hasn't done anything else since getting away with his own crimes against Natalie Wood-- and there's always probable cause to at least investigate someone who got away with rape once, no matter how long ago the statute of limitations on that particular rape expired.
But the question remains: since Kirk Douglas raped Natalie Wood and got away with it (before Coker and Kennedy), what did he do after Coker and Kennedy? And even since he got away with raping Natalie Wood, who else did he rape before Coker and Kennedy?
Since they can reopen the Natalie Wood drowning case, they can investigate Kirk Douglas to make sure that he hasn't done anything else since getting away with his own crimes against Natalie Wood-- and there's always probable cause to at least investigate someone who got away with rape once, no matter how long ago the statute of limitations on that particular rape expired.
Once Jewish, Always Jewish-- And Usually Dreked On For Whatever Reason
I already blogged about Natalie Wood nee Zakharenko Gurdin. I've also blogged about my family several times, and beyond consistently about Pfc. Bernard S. "Bernie" Czarnecki nee Chernetski or Czarniecki (since the 1920 Census gives "Chernetski", and the naturalization records for his parents and brother Tony gives "Czarniecki"). When you're like Great-Granduncle Bernie, you get dreked on-- crapped on, s___ted on. You get dreked on worse than Pfc. Leonard Kravitz:
"[Lenny Kravitz was n]amed after his uncle, Pfc. Leonard Kravitz, who was killed in action in Korea on 7 March 1951 while suppressing a Chinese attack and saving most of his platoon; he was posthumously awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. Lenny has joined the fight to get his uncle the Medal of Honor. Supporters believe the Medal of Honor was denied to Pfc. Kravitz because he was Jewish."
Great-Granduncle Bernie joined the Army earlier than or on December 12, 1940. Born Anusi, he remained a Jewish Catholic and served with the 111th Infantry Division's Medical Core. Shot in the head with shrapnel and operated on to get the shrapnel removed, he came through the operation unsuccesfully and was buried at Holy Family Cemetery in an unceremonious way after he was removed from the Lebanon, PA Veterans' Affairs Hospital and Homes. He took 18 years to be fully KIA, breathing his last breath on July 16, 1963.
Nobody carries his name-- none of my side or his other grand- and great-grand-nephews and -nieces have his name. Nobody remembers him-- his drekish nephew Jack and others even refused to acknowledge that he existed for the longest of time. Nobody visits his grave, which lies untouched at Holy Family Cemetery. Nobody tries to go after the estates of those who defrauded him and his beloved sister Alice Dombroski-- his two brothers, John and Joe, who got his mentally-changed self to sign off his own and Alice's survivor's Social Security benefits to them before he died.
At least Pfc. Leonard Albert Kravitz has family fighting for him. Pfc. Bernard S. "Bernie" Czarnecki (WW2, 111th Infantry Division Medical Core, KIA) doesn't even have his name and memory carried on.
"[Lenny Kravitz was n]amed after his uncle, Pfc. Leonard Kravitz, who was killed in action in Korea on 7 March 1951 while suppressing a Chinese attack and saving most of his platoon; he was posthumously awarded the Distinguished Service Cross. Lenny has joined the fight to get his uncle the Medal of Honor. Supporters believe the Medal of Honor was denied to Pfc. Kravitz because he was Jewish."
Great-Granduncle Bernie joined the Army earlier than or on December 12, 1940. Born Anusi, he remained a Jewish Catholic and served with the 111th Infantry Division's Medical Core. Shot in the head with shrapnel and operated on to get the shrapnel removed, he came through the operation unsuccesfully and was buried at Holy Family Cemetery in an unceremonious way after he was removed from the Lebanon, PA Veterans' Affairs Hospital and Homes. He took 18 years to be fully KIA, breathing his last breath on July 16, 1963.
Nobody carries his name-- none of my side or his other grand- and great-grand-nephews and -nieces have his name. Nobody remembers him-- his drekish nephew Jack and others even refused to acknowledge that he existed for the longest of time. Nobody visits his grave, which lies untouched at Holy Family Cemetery. Nobody tries to go after the estates of those who defrauded him and his beloved sister Alice Dombroski-- his two brothers, John and Joe, who got his mentally-changed self to sign off his own and Alice's survivor's Social Security benefits to them before he died.
At least Pfc. Leonard Albert Kravitz has family fighting for him. Pfc. Bernard S. "Bernie" Czarnecki (WW2, 111th Infantry Division Medical Core, KIA) doesn't even have his name and memory carried on.
Sunday, November 20, 2011
Can We End Hunger and Poverty? Not In This Lifetime...
Mark 14:6-9
New King James Version (NKJV)
6 But Jesus said, “Let her alone.
Why do you trouble her? She has done a good work for Me. 7 For you have the poor with you always, and whenever you
wish you may do them good; but Me you do not have always. 8 She has done what she could. She has come beforehand to
anoint My body for burial. 9
Assuredly, I say to you, wherever this gospel is preached in the whole world,
what this woman has done will also be told as a memorial to her.”
And
And
John 12
New King James Version (NKJV)
1 Then, six days before the Passover, Jesus came to
Bethany, where Lazarus was who had been dead,[a]
whom He had raised from the dead. 2
There they made Him a supper; and Martha served, but Lazarus was one of those
who sat at the table with Him. 3 Then
Mary took a pound of very costly oil of spikenard, anointed the feet of Jesus,
and wiped His feet with her hair. And the house was filled with the fragrance of
the oil.
4 But one of His disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, who would betray Him, said, 5 “Why was this fragrant oil not sold for three hundred denarii[b] and given to the poor?” 6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor, but because he was a thief, and had the money box; and he used to take what was put in it.
7 But Jesus said, “Let her alone; she has kept[c] this for the day of My burial. 8 For the poor you have with you always, but Me you do not have always.”
4 But one of His disciples, Judas Iscariot, Simon’s son, who would betray Him, said, 5 “Why was this fragrant oil not sold for three hundred denarii[b] and given to the poor?” 6 This he said, not that he cared for the poor, but because he was a thief, and had the money box; and he used to take what was put in it.
7 But Jesus said, “Let her alone; she has kept[c] this for the day of My burial. 8 For the poor you have with you always, but Me you do not have always.”
Luke 7:36-40
New King James Version (NKJV)
A Sinful Woman Forgiven
36 Then one of the Pharisees asked Him to
eat with him. And He went to the Pharisee’s house, and sat down to eat. 37 And behold, a woman in the city who was
a sinner, when she knew that Jesus sat at the table in the Pharisee’s
house, brought an alabaster flask of fragrant oil, 38 and stood at His feet behind Him weeping; and she
began to wash His feet with her tears, and wiped them with the hair of
her head; and she kissed His feet and anointed them with the fragrant
oil. 39 Now when the Pharisee who had
invited Him saw this, he spoke to himself, saying, “This Man, if He were
a prophet, would know who and what manner of woman this is who is
touching Him, for she is a sinner.”
40 And Jesus answered and said to him, “Simon, I have something to say to you.”
So he said, “Teacher, say it.”
40 And Jesus answered and said to him, “Simon, I have something to say to you.”
So he said, “Teacher, say it.”
We know that this Mary was Miryam Ha'Achot-Eliezer v'Marta. Another Mary, Miryam m'Migdal, was healed of seven demons (cf. Mark 16:9, Luke 8:2). And they weren't taken out of all their pain, hunger, and suffering right away. But something kept them going. A most-important hunger and thirst was fulfilled. What was it? Hatoldah shel HaShomronit Yehudit can tell you:
A woman of Samaria came to draw water. Jesus said to her, “Give Me a drink.”
8 For His disciples had gone away
into the city to buy food.
9 Then the woman of Samaria said to Him, “How is it that You, being a Jew, ask a drink from me, a Samaritan woman?” For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.
10 Jesus answered and said to her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, ‘Give Me a drink,’ you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water.” 11 The woman said to Him, “Sir, You have nothing to draw with, and the well is deep. Where then do You get that living water? 12 Are You greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank from it himself, as well as his sons and his livestock?”
13 Jesus answered and said to her, “Whoever drinks of this water will thirst again, 14 but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst. But the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life.”
15 The woman said to Him, “Sir, give me this water, that I may not thirst, nor come here to draw.”
9 Then the woman of Samaria said to Him, “How is it that You, being a Jew, ask a drink from me, a Samaritan woman?” For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.
10 Jesus answered and said to her, “If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, ‘Give Me a drink,’ you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water.” 11 The woman said to Him, “Sir, You have nothing to draw with, and the well is deep. Where then do You get that living water? 12 Are You greater than our father Jacob, who gave us the well, and drank from it himself, as well as his sons and his livestock?”
13 Jesus answered and said to her, “Whoever drinks of this water will thirst again, 14 but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst. But the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life.”
15 The woman said to Him, “Sir, give me this water, that I may not thirst, nor come here to draw.”
(A Parsha Katan: Mayim L'Chaim)
And
The Bread from Heaven
22 On the following day, when the people who were standing
on the other side of the sea saw that there was no other boat there, except that
one which His disciples had entered,[c]
and that Jesus had not entered the boat with His disciples, but His disciples
had gone away alone— 23 however,
other boats came from Tiberias, near the place where they ate bread after the
Lord had given thanks— 24 when the
people therefore saw that Jesus was not there, nor His disciples, they also got
into boats and came to Capernaum, seeking Jesus. 25 And when they found Him on the other side of the sea,
they said to Him, “Rabbi, when did You come here?”
26 Jesus answered them and said, “Most assuredly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw the signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled. 27 Do not labor for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to everlasting life, which the Son of Man will give you, because God the Father has set His seal on Him.”
28 Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?”
29 Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.”
30 Therefore they said to Him, “What sign will You perform then, that we may see it and believe You? What work will You do? 31 Our fathers ate the manna in the desert; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’”[d]
32 Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, Moses did not give you the bread from heaven, but My Father gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is He who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”
34 Then they said to Him, “Lord, give us this bread always.”
35 And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst. 36 But I said to you that you have seen Me and yet do not believe. 37 All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out. 38 For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. 39 This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day. 40 And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.”
26 Jesus answered them and said, “Most assuredly, I say to you, you seek Me, not because you saw the signs, but because you ate of the loaves and were filled. 27 Do not labor for the food which perishes, but for the food which endures to everlasting life, which the Son of Man will give you, because God the Father has set His seal on Him.”
28 Then they said to Him, “What shall we do, that we may work the works of God?”
29 Jesus answered and said to them, “This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent.”
30 Therefore they said to Him, “What sign will You perform then, that we may see it and believe You? What work will You do? 31 Our fathers ate the manna in the desert; as it is written, ‘He gave them bread from heaven to eat.’”[d]
32 Then Jesus said to them, “Most assuredly, I say to you, Moses did not give you the bread from heaven, but My Father gives you the true bread from heaven. 33 For the bread of God is He who comes down from heaven and gives life to the world.”
34 Then they said to Him, “Lord, give us this bread always.”
35 And Jesus said to them, “I am the bread of life. He who comes to Me shall never hunger, and he who believes in Me shall never thirst. 36 But I said to you that you have seen Me and yet do not believe. 37 All that the Father gives Me will come to Me, and the one who comes to Me I will by no means cast out. 38 For I have come down from heaven, not to do My own will, but the will of Him who sent Me. 39 This is the will of the Father who sent Me, that of all He has given Me I should lose nothing, but should raise it up at the last day. 40 And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day.”
(A Parsha Katan: Lechem M'Shamayim)
As for me, I've admittedly had to Google and otherwise online-wise learn HaLashon shel Avoti; since I myself (as I've explained several times) never got the chance to get Ivrit or Yidish passed down to me. But that's a part of the hunger and thirst that I've had to have fulfilled: first coming to Mashiach and then having to discover b'Ezrat Mashiach a heritage and a chosenness that I missed for much of my life-- and a heritage that is much more fulfilling than the Anusi, Self-Hating heritage that my dad and his parents (and much of our family) had, has, and sadly continues to have lived with.
So I in my own situation-- as both Miryams and the Shomronit Yehudit learned in their own situations-- that one may not be able to end physical or other hungers right away and in this lifetime; but one can-- b'Ezrat Mashiach-- fulfill spiritual hunger, which is the most-important hunger to fulfill.
I Finally Gave In and Joined Faceshuk, Though I'd've Preferred An Invitation...
I like to humble, whether or not you believe me. That's much of why I don't self promote. I like to let the chips fall where they may and be reached out to over reaching out. For example, from Luke 14:
12 Then He also said to him who invited Him, “When you give a dinner or a supper, do not ask your friends, your brothers, your relatives, nor rich neighbors, lest they also invite you back, and you be repaid. 13 But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind. 14 And you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you; for you shall be repaid at the resurrection of the just.”
Not to brag, but I've done this in many situations before and have felt guily, worried, or cocky when doing otherwise.
Take the Lowly Place
7 So He told a parable to those who were invited, when He noted how they chose the best places, saying to them: 8 “When you are invited by anyone to a wedding feast, do not sit down in the best place, lest one more honorable than you be invited by him; 9 and he who invited you and him come and say to you, ‘Give place to this man,’ and then you begin with shame to take the lowest place. 10 But when you are invited, go and sit down in the lowest place, so that when he who invited you comes he may say to you, ‘Friend, go up higher.’ Then you will have glory in the presence of those who sit at the table with you. 11 For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted.”12 Then He also said to him who invited Him, “When you give a dinner or a supper, do not ask your friends, your brothers, your relatives, nor rich neighbors, lest they also invite you back, and you be repaid. 13 But when you give a feast, invite the poor, the maimed, the lame, the blind. 14 And you will be blessed, because they cannot repay you; for you shall be repaid at the resurrection of the just.”
Not to brag, but I've done this in many situations before and have felt guily, worried, or cocky when doing otherwise.
My Sister Actually Made This Jewelery With A Nice Jewelery Maker's Kit (Not a Paid Advertisement)...
In fact, she was kidding about me actually promoting...
Though she appreciates that I did promote her jewelery making.
 |
| This ring |
 |
| These earrings |
 |
| And this necklace |
I Have To Market Better, Because Only 43 People Like My Facebook Page...
Yet, 246 Twitter followers, 197 YouTube subscribers, about 62 Facebook friend requests and suggestions... and I won't resort to sex, violence, and other cheap-and-easy methods of disingenousness and low integrity. So, I'm in a bind. 43/505 = .0851485149 (which reads like a phone number; but anyway...). I have about 9 people who like my Facebook page for every 100 people of whom I have an audience (and I didn't even count the YouTube Friends and Facebook Friends who I have, or the Facebook subscribers-- some of whom may be one in the same or in multiple categories).
I have to market better somehow, and without restoring to low or flank methods (including attack methods-- e.g., personal attacks that are entirely baseless and just to get attention. I don't say what I can't back up, despite what my haters might say.).
I have to market better somehow, and without restoring to low or flank methods (including attack methods-- e.g., personal attacks that are entirely baseless and just to get attention. I don't say what I can't back up, despite what my haters might say.).
I Think That I Now Know Who Hates Me On YouTube...
That Mormon Antimissionary EscapeNewJersey seems to hate every one of my videos and, of late, always has an Anti-Semitic, Antimissionary, and Mormon Supremacist comment to make. Some comments he'll make anonymously (And what does he have to hide; except that-- oh, maybe-- he's a coward?); some he'll make with his moniker, and some with the "Dislike" button on YouTube (He's mostly or always the one "Dislike" which I get per video.).
Who proves whose points now, Frank (which you've said that your name is, EscapeNewJersey)? Get a life and go Mormonize somewhere else-- Mormon proselytization is not welcome here.
Who proves whose points now, Frank (which you've said that your name is, EscapeNewJersey)? Get a life and go Mormonize somewhere else-- Mormon proselytization is not welcome here.
Saturday, November 19, 2011
Mormon Anti Semitism Which Makes One Wonder Why Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) Is Mormon
"EscapeNewJersey
Reply to your comment on: SHOW OFF YOUR DEAD: MAUSOLEUMS @Nickidewbear Sorry to say, but Jews are materialistic in life and in death. Jews don't believe in the afterlife, they only believe in the here and now. That is why I'm a Mormon."
There are several problems with EscapeNewJersey's statement:
Reply to your comment on: SHOW OFF YOUR DEAD: MAUSOLEUMS @Nickidewbear Sorry to say, but Jews are materialistic in life and in death. Jews don't believe in the afterlife, they only believe in the here and now. That is why I'm a Mormon."
There are several problems with EscapeNewJersey's statement:
- Only Reform and more-Liberal Jews do not believe in an afterlife. Conservative and Orthodox P'rushi, Kara'i, and Messianic Jews do believe in an afterlife. However, some Reform and other Liberal Jews do believe in an afterlife. Directly from the URJ Website FAQ:
- "Reform Judaism, while not taking any "official" position on the matter, has for the most part ignored the question, and tended towards the belief that there is no such thing. The attitude of Judaism might best be summed up as "We really do not know, but if there is a life after this one, and a reward for what we do, then surely it will be dependent upon the kind of life we have lived - therefore, let us strive to follow God's path for us as closely and as enthusiastically as possible, for then we will surely know all manner of rewards, especially the one of seeing a world that is a better place for our efforts"."
- From FAQs.org: "That said, traditional Judaism does address this question. To put it shortly, our beliefs in resurection and afterlife vary widely. Some believe it is part of the Messianic era. Some consider it an era ofits own, after the messianic one. It's a matter of debate in Jewish tradition as to whether the post resurection life is permanent, or temporary."
- At surface value, materialism would not be consistent with Democratic or liberal (Classical Conservative) values-- which many Jews hold-- or with Republican, conservative (Classical Liberal), charitable values. Both Jewish Democrats and Republicans, and other Jews take seriously tikun-ha'olam-- even if we interpret it in different ways. Tikun ha'olam is defined as, for instance, "Correcting the world, repairing the world; an action promoting social justice [H[ebrew]]".
- At least in Christianity (including Messianic Judaism), ha'olam haba is not focused on avodah tovah v'avodah zarah-- good and bad works--, although there will be rewards and losses for each. The afterlife is about Elohim, with focus on that we received yeshuat from and thus give toda v'kavod to Yeshua with Yehovah Ha'Av v'Yehovah Ha'Ru'ach-HaKodesh. For, "1 [t]herefore we also, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us lay aside every weight, and the sin which so easily ensnares us, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, 2 looking unto Jesus, the author and finisher of our faith, who for the joy that was set before Him endured the cross, despising the shame, and has sat down at the right hand of the throne of God."
Natalie Wood Wagner Was Jewish? And If So, Her Story's Not Much Different Than Mine...
She's been said to be Russian American and a Byzantine-Russian Catholic cross is on her grave:
I did wonder if she was Jewish myself, however-- Russians aren't typically brown-eyed brunettes. Also, we Jews are descended from some of the most-beautiful woman in the world-- e.g., Sarah, Rivkah, Rakha'el, and Le'ah. And (in my opinion), there's just something about Jewish beauty that no other ethnicity has-- which is why Great-Grandma Czarnecki was so beautiful for a Slovakian (No wonder that she was so beautiful: she was a Matrilineal Jew through Anna Trudniakova nee Monkaova.). And according to IMDB.com, "Though some people cite her mother as being French, her mother is Russian. The source of this misconception comes from the studio that Natalie worked at when she was a child -- people noticed her mother's accent and when asked if she was French, Maria replied: "Oh yes", a white lie that would contribute to this confusion."
Maria Zakharenkova Gurdinova also "claimed that the family was closely related to the Romanov dynasty." This story sounds all too familar to that of the Morgiewicz-Andrulewicz and Danilowicz-Chernetski son who was given the identity of the szlatcha-descended, Polish-Lithuanian Catholic known as Antoni Czarniecki-- and we all remember that Antoni Jan Julianowicz Czarniecki nee Chernetski was revealed to be a meshumad Yehudi who was forced to become Anusi because of the pogroms and Anti Semitism in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania-- and the rest of America (Remember that his parents and he were kicked out of Lipsk because of their Anusi conversion in Roman Catholicism-- which they obviously found out more palatable to pretend to be into than Byzantine-Russian Catholicism, the religion officially forced upon Russian-annexed Poland.).
So, Natalie Wood Wagner-- if she was a beautiful Ashkenazit Yehudit-- was a lot prettier, smarter, and more talented than those two Anti Semites commenting on my blog will ever be-- and how sad that Anti Semites let envy breed contempt instead of themselves do something with their own lives.
Update (2:54 PM EST): Well, check this: according to JewishGen.org:
So one never knows. Advice to the Zakharenko-Wood family, by the way: please contact this guy if you think that you're related to him. He'd love you all so much.
I did wonder if she was Jewish myself, however-- Russians aren't typically brown-eyed brunettes. Also, we Jews are descended from some of the most-beautiful woman in the world-- e.g., Sarah, Rivkah, Rakha'el, and Le'ah. And (in my opinion), there's just something about Jewish beauty that no other ethnicity has-- which is why Great-Grandma Czarnecki was so beautiful for a Slovakian (No wonder that she was so beautiful: she was a Matrilineal Jew through Anna Trudniakova nee Monkaova.). And according to IMDB.com, "Though some people cite her mother as being French, her mother is Russian. The source of this misconception comes from the studio that Natalie worked at when she was a child -- people noticed her mother's accent and when asked if she was French, Maria replied: "Oh yes", a white lie that would contribute to this confusion."
Maria Zakharenkova Gurdinova also "claimed that the family was closely related to the Romanov dynasty." This story sounds all too familar to that of the Morgiewicz-Andrulewicz and Danilowicz-Chernetski son who was given the identity of the szlatcha-descended, Polish-Lithuanian Catholic known as Antoni Czarniecki-- and we all remember that Antoni Jan Julianowicz Czarniecki nee Chernetski was revealed to be a meshumad Yehudi who was forced to become Anusi because of the pogroms and Anti Semitism in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania-- and the rest of America (Remember that his parents and he were kicked out of Lipsk because of their Anusi conversion in Roman Catholicism-- which they obviously found out more palatable to pretend to be into than Byzantine-Russian Catholicism, the religion officially forced upon Russian-annexed Poland.).
So, Natalie Wood Wagner-- if she was a beautiful Ashkenazit Yehudit-- was a lot prettier, smarter, and more talented than those two Anti Semites commenting on my blog will ever be-- and how sad that Anti Semites let envy breed contempt instead of themselves do something with their own lives.
Update (2:54 PM EST): Well, check this: according to JewishGen.org:
| Zakharenko |  Bila Tserkva |
Ukraine | 11 Sep 1997 | Larry Posner (#3317) 611 Nicole Drive Southampton, PA 18966 United States Click HERE to contact Larry Posner (#3317) Last logged in: before 2004 NF No Forwarding Address |
So one never knows. Advice to the Zakharenko-Wood family, by the way: please contact this guy if you think that you're related to him. He'd love you all so much.
Friday, November 18, 2011
If Jews Ran Hollywood, Hollywood Wouldn't Be As Secular or Anti Israel...
And the Jews that do have clout and power in Hollywood aren't Kara'i or-- toda el HaShem-- P'rushi haredi Jews at all. For example, my fashion designer cousin Marcela J. "Mia" Danilowicz, who may still be gaining prominence as a fashion designer if my boycott against her antithesis-of-humble and rude behavior doesn't work, is Non-Evangelical Roman Catholic, seriously doesn't care about our Jewish heritage anymore (if she ever did), and takes great pains to hide that she's even from our meshuge mispoche-- which is part of her arrogance (and anyone in our family who tries to look good in the world's eyes tries to hide that they're from that Rusnak, Fosko, Gaydos, Danilowicz, or other associated-with-me crazy family. And that's why Mia called me "fucking psycho"-- how dare that I'm actually honest that our family is imperfect).
As for other Jews who clout and hold power Hollywood-- e.g., Natalie Portman, Kirk Douglas, and Ben Stiller--, they're all very Democrat, secular (ranging from only-ethnically Jewish to P'rushi Masorti), and even Anti Jewish and Anti Missionary in some cases. For example, Natalie Portman voted for John Kerry, fornicated with her now- (who was someone else's) fiance Benjamin Millipied, and was livid with her dad for suggesting that anyone of her partners undergo brit milah:
"“A priority for me is definitely that I’d like to raise my kids Jewish, but the ultimate thing is to have someone who is a good person and who is a partner,” she said.
"Natalie was born in Israel, but her family moved to America when she was just three. Her father is still very much in touch with his Jewish roots, and apparently tries to encourage non-Jewish boyfriends like Gael to convert.
"“He always makes this stupid joke,” admitted Natalie. “He says, ‘It’s just a simple operation’.”"
As for examples of P'rushim Masortim, who-- like Reform Jews-- do not take Tanakh as the Word of G-d, one is Kirk Douglas. As the SCJFAQ section of Shamash.org states:
"Conservative Judaism hold that the laws of the Torah and Talmud are of divine origin, and thus mandates the following of Halakha (Jewish law). At the same time, the Conservative movement recognizes the human element in the Torah and Talmud, and accepts modern scholarship which shows that Jewish writings also show the influence of other cultures, and in general can be treated as historical documents."
There is no human element in Tanakh, Torah or otherwise-- Tanakh was written down davar l'davar by soferim who heard and listened to Ruach HaKodesh; and P'rushim Masortim like Kirk Douglas do not believe that. As for Talmud Bavli, Jews ranging from Natalie Portman to Kirk Douglas ascribe something to it-- unlike Kara'im and many Meshichim, who know that Talmud Bavli is an outright revisionist attempt to specifically break the mitzvah not to add or take from Tanakh.
Besides; Hollywood has many Non-Evangelical Catholics like Mel Gibson and Martin Scorsese, Atheists, and other gentiles (We include Jewish Catholics and Atheists, and other Jews in Natalie Portman, Kirk Douglas, and other Jews in Hollywood). So, trust that clout and power-- not Jews-- run Hollywood.
As for other Jews who clout and hold power Hollywood-- e.g., Natalie Portman, Kirk Douglas, and Ben Stiller--, they're all very Democrat, secular (ranging from only-ethnically Jewish to P'rushi Masorti), and even Anti Jewish and Anti Missionary in some cases. For example, Natalie Portman voted for John Kerry, fornicated with her now- (who was someone else's) fiance Benjamin Millipied, and was livid with her dad for suggesting that anyone of her partners undergo brit milah:
"“A priority for me is definitely that I’d like to raise my kids Jewish, but the ultimate thing is to have someone who is a good person and who is a partner,” she said.
"Natalie was born in Israel, but her family moved to America when she was just three. Her father is still very much in touch with his Jewish roots, and apparently tries to encourage non-Jewish boyfriends like Gael to convert.
"“He always makes this stupid joke,” admitted Natalie. “He says, ‘It’s just a simple operation’.”"
As for examples of P'rushim Masortim, who-- like Reform Jews-- do not take Tanakh as the Word of G-d, one is Kirk Douglas. As the SCJFAQ section of Shamash.org states:
"Conservative Judaism hold that the laws of the Torah and Talmud are of divine origin, and thus mandates the following of Halakha (Jewish law). At the same time, the Conservative movement recognizes the human element in the Torah and Talmud, and accepts modern scholarship which shows that Jewish writings also show the influence of other cultures, and in general can be treated as historical documents."
There is no human element in Tanakh, Torah or otherwise-- Tanakh was written down davar l'davar by soferim who heard and listened to Ruach HaKodesh; and P'rushim Masortim like Kirk Douglas do not believe that. As for Talmud Bavli, Jews ranging from Natalie Portman to Kirk Douglas ascribe something to it-- unlike Kara'im and many Meshichim, who know that Talmud Bavli is an outright revisionist attempt to specifically break the mitzvah not to add or take from Tanakh.
Besides; Hollywood has many Non-Evangelical Catholics like Mel Gibson and Martin Scorsese, Atheists, and other gentiles (We include Jewish Catholics and Atheists, and other Jews in Natalie Portman, Kirk Douglas, and other Jews in Hollywood). So, trust that clout and power-- not Jews-- run Hollywood.
I Finally Got A Name Submitted To Masada2000.org... And I Seriously Don't Care To Remain Anonyomous...
I got Self-Hating Levi and British Prime Minister David Cameron added for his abandoning of the Jewish National Fund and for supporting the Gaza flotilla. David Cameron could've obviously suggested "Hey; let's give Pleshet (Philista) back to the Pleshetim (Palestinians, aka "Philistines") and have it ruled by Yehudah as in the days of old." But PM Cameron had to support the Gaza flotilla instead of using his power and clout to restore toldot shel Yehoshua ben Nun v'shalom-- so he couldn't get history and peace back on the right track?
 |
| Palestine is in Yehudah, which doesn't take rocket science to figure out. |
So They Try To Reinvestigate Apparent Murderer Robert Wood But Not Rapist Kirk Douglas?
The LAPD already stated that Robert Wagner is not a suspect in his late first (and third) wife (Natalie Wood Wagner)'s death-- so we're left with maybe even (as others have said) Christopher Walken or even (and I think others will say or have said) the captain. Meanwhile, nobody is talking about reinvestigating child raptist Kirk Douglas (since, by law, then 16-year-old Natalie Wood was a child when he raped her, and he could've gotten the death penalty-- this was 1944 or even 1945, after all; and hopefully, ex post facto would not apply to him since he raped her before the decisions to outlaw the death penalty for child rape).
Meanwhile, someone did once ask if I'm related to Kirk Douglas, ne Issur Danielovitch Demsky. I mean, we're both cleft-chinned Ashkenazic Jews with descent from Jews born in the then-Russian Empire. But as far as I know, we're not related.
But then again, maybe that's partly why hutzpah-laced Jack Czarnecki didn't admit that his granddad Julian Czarnecki ne Chernetski was the son of Krasne, Suwalki-born "Katarzyna" Danilowicza Chernetska-- a murderer of his own mother wouldn't be to be related to a child rapist, right? Even the hardest of criminals and toughest of incarcerated criminals hate sexual offenders and criminals against children-- especially sex offenders against children.
I suppose, however, that being related to Kirk Douglas would come as no surprise-- I mean, I'm related to Jack Czarnecki, his meshugene cousin Marcela J. "Mia" Danilowicz (and she was "Mia", and I will never let her forget where she came from), and his meshugener uncles John and Joe Czarnecki (who committed Social Security fraud and explotation against Pfc. Bernard S. "Bernie" Czarnecki, WW2, KIA-- and it took him 18 years to die from a botched-shrapnel-removal operation at Lebanon Veterans Affairs' Hospital).
Update (3:50 PM EST): I'm not laughing in a "Ha, ha" but an "Oh, G-d, help us all" way right now-- Gomel (Homiel) isn't too far for how much one could've moved over the years or even for a Yom Tov. And Pop-Pop did always say that we were Polish-Lithuanian... G-d, help us all. By the way, remember who journeyed from Lipsk to Tsuman, Ukraine just for Rosh Chodesh Cheshvan... so, Krasne-Gomel movements are not that farfetched.
Meanwhile, someone did once ask if I'm related to Kirk Douglas, ne Issur Danielovitch Demsky. I mean, we're both cleft-chinned Ashkenazic Jews with descent from Jews born in the then-Russian Empire. But as far as I know, we're not related.
But then again, maybe that's partly why hutzpah-laced Jack Czarnecki didn't admit that his granddad Julian Czarnecki ne Chernetski was the son of Krasne, Suwalki-born "Katarzyna" Danilowicza Chernetska-- a murderer of his own mother wouldn't be to be related to a child rapist, right? Even the hardest of criminals and toughest of incarcerated criminals hate sexual offenders and criminals against children-- especially sex offenders against children.
I suppose, however, that being related to Kirk Douglas would come as no surprise-- I mean, I'm related to Jack Czarnecki, his meshugene cousin Marcela J. "Mia" Danilowicz (and she was "Mia", and I will never let her forget where she came from), and his meshugener uncles John and Joe Czarnecki (who committed Social Security fraud and explotation against Pfc. Bernard S. "Bernie" Czarnecki, WW2, KIA-- and it took him 18 years to die from a botched-shrapnel-removal operation at Lebanon Veterans Affairs' Hospital).
Update (3:50 PM EST): I'm not laughing in a "Ha, ha" but an "Oh, G-d, help us all" way right now-- Gomel (Homiel) isn't too far for how much one could've moved over the years or even for a Yom Tov. And Pop-Pop did always say that we were Polish-Lithuanian... G-d, help us all. By the way, remember who journeyed from Lipsk to Tsuman, Ukraine just for Rosh Chodesh Cheshvan... so, Krasne-Gomel movements are not that farfetched.
Wednesday, November 16, 2011
So This Romanian Keeps Reading My Desire To Cover "Mockingbird"; So...
Why doesn't he send me the other part of "Mockingbird" (at least once I get my soundcard-- not actually my speakers, but my whole soundcard-- repaired, restored-- provided a miracle-- or replaced)? I could remix it and we'd have a cover of "Mockingbird". I have my e-mail address on my blog and Facebook page.
As a Messianic Jew, I Have Some Questions... Such As...
- (When anything tempts me not to want the Rapture or to want the Rapture to be delayed a little longer) Who's gonna care about anything else (e.g., marriage, drawing more cartoons, reading a blog post) when the Rapture comes?
- (When a fellow Jew says that he or she is tolerant, won't bash anyone else, etc.) Does that include Messianic Jews (Jewish Christrians), especially those who are open about our faith but don't proselytize? (Because we get persecuted a lot and accused as missionaries in a perjorative sense.)
- Why aren't more people praying for the Rapture?
"Kaddish Tikabel" or "The Complete Kaddish"
Kaddish Tikabel
A version can also be seen at Wikipedia's "Kaddish" page.
My recommendation is to recite at least what you've memorized of it every time that you think about it at minimum, if you can-- after all, don't you wan't the Rapture to come? For:
13 Return, O LORD!
How long?
And have compassion on Your servants.
14 Oh, satisfy us early with Your mercy,
That we may rejoice and be glad all our days! (Psalm 90:13-14, NKJV)
and
A version can also be seen at Wikipedia's "Kaddish" page.
My recommendation is to recite at least what you've memorized of it every time that you think about it at minimum, if you can-- after all, don't you wan't the Rapture to come? For:
13 Return, O LORD!
How long?
And have compassion on Your servants.
14 Oh, satisfy us early with Your mercy,
That we may rejoice and be glad all our days! (Psalm 90:13-14, NKJV)
and
11 Therefore, since all these things will be dissolved, what manner of persons ought you to be in holy conduct and godliness, 12 looking for and hastening the coming of the day of God, because of which the heavens will be dissolved, being on fire, and the elements will melt with fervent heat? 13 Nevertheless we, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new earth in which righteousness dwells. (2 Peter 3:11-13)
Tuesday, November 15, 2011
"It's Not What Goes In.... But What Comes Out"
"10 When He had called the multitude to Himself, He said to them, “Hear and understand: 11 Not what goes into the mouth defiles a man; but what comes out of the mouth, this defiles a man.”
12 Then His disciples came and said to Him, “Do You know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?”
13 But He answered and said, “Every plant which My heavenly Father has not planted will be uprooted. 14 Let them alone. They are blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind leads the blind, both will fall into a ditch.”
15 Then Peter answered and said to Him, “Explain this parable to us.”
16 So Jesus said, “Are you also still without understanding? 17 Do you not yet understand that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and is eliminated? 18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile a man. 19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies. 20 These are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man.”"
And:
"14 I know and am convinced by the Lord Jesus that there is nothing unclean of itself; but to him who considers anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean. 15 Yet if your brother is grieved because of your food, you are no longer walking in love. Do not destroy with your food the one for whom Christ died. 16 Therefore do not let your good be spoken of as evil; 17 for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. 18 For he who serves Christ in these things[e]is acceptable to God and approved by men.
19 Therefore let us pursue the things which make for peace and the things by which one may edify another. 20 Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All things indeed are pure, but it is evil for the man who eats with offense. 21 It is good neither to eat meat nor drink wine nor do anything by which your brother stumbles or is offended or is made weak.[f] 22 Do you have faith?[g] Have it to yourself before God. Happy is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves. 23 But he who doubts is condemned if he eats, because he does not eat from faith; for whatever is not from faith is sin.[h]"
Same with rap, rock, etc.-- music doesn't make a person say or do things: what is already in the person will make him or her gravatate toward and be affected-- not effected-- by the music. "But those things which proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile a man." and "[T]here is nothing unclean of itself; but to him who considers anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean."
So, James Dobson and those who say that music effects grow b'nei v'b'not-mitzvot to do things are absolutely wrong; but they may not be wrong about undiscerning, impressionable, effectable children-- though children can be very discerning, unaffected and uneffected, and unimpressionable as well. However, " 12 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. 13 Foods for the stomach and the stomach for foods, but God will destroy both it and them."
12 Then His disciples came and said to Him, “Do You know that the Pharisees were offended when they heard this saying?”
13 But He answered and said, “Every plant which My heavenly Father has not planted will be uprooted. 14 Let them alone. They are blind leaders of the blind. And if the blind leads the blind, both will fall into a ditch.”
15 Then Peter answered and said to Him, “Explain this parable to us.”
16 So Jesus said, “Are you also still without understanding? 17 Do you not yet understand that whatever enters the mouth goes into the stomach and is eliminated? 18 But those things which proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile a man. 19 For out of the heart proceed evil thoughts, murders, adulteries, fornications, thefts, false witness, blasphemies. 20 These are the things which defile a man, but to eat with unwashed hands does not defile a man.”"
And:
"14 I know and am convinced by the Lord Jesus that there is nothing unclean of itself; but to him who considers anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean. 15 Yet if your brother is grieved because of your food, you are no longer walking in love. Do not destroy with your food the one for whom Christ died. 16 Therefore do not let your good be spoken of as evil; 17 for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. 18 For he who serves Christ in these things[e]is acceptable to God and approved by men.
19 Therefore let us pursue the things which make for peace and the things by which one may edify another. 20 Do not destroy the work of God for the sake of food. All things indeed are pure, but it is evil for the man who eats with offense. 21 It is good neither to eat meat nor drink wine nor do anything by which your brother stumbles or is offended or is made weak.[f] 22 Do you have faith?[g] Have it to yourself before God. Happy is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves. 23 But he who doubts is condemned if he eats, because he does not eat from faith; for whatever is not from faith is sin.[h]"
Same with rap, rock, etc.-- music doesn't make a person say or do things: what is already in the person will make him or her gravatate toward and be affected-- not effected-- by the music. "But those things which proceed out of the mouth come from the heart, and they defile a man." and "[T]here is nothing unclean of itself; but to him who considers anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean."
So, James Dobson and those who say that music effects grow b'nei v'b'not-mitzvot to do things are absolutely wrong; but they may not be wrong about undiscerning, impressionable, effectable children-- though children can be very discerning, unaffected and uneffected, and unimpressionable as well. However, " 12 All things are lawful for me, but all things are not helpful. All things are lawful for me, but I will not be brought under the power of any. 13 Foods for the stomach and the stomach for foods, but God will destroy both it and them."
Monday, November 14, 2011
As A Jew, I Thoroughly Resent Any Portrayal of Jesus As Black or White
Dr. Marylin Kulik of Berkely College cites a fairly-often-used map that suggests, if not shows, that Jesus was Olive-- not Black (shakar), White (lavan), Yellow (tzahov), Red ('Adom, though 'Adam was 'Adom, but Iraqi 'Adom-- red or ruddy), or Brown (hum), but Olive (zayit). The Diaspora (HaGalut) left many of us looking all the different colors, though some of us retained the Olive complexion (including the Olive complexion in my own Ashkenazic Jewish family).
So the more that I'm becoming aware and getting closer to my Jewish heritage, the more that I resent any portrayal of Jesus as Black or White.
Some People Are Total Idiots and Mormons; And Saying That Is Being Nice...
For example, some sicko thought that he was being funny by joking that he helped a pervert commit a crime against a child-- or if he wasn't joking, he outright bragged that he was an accessory to a crime. There is nothing funny about crime, let alone any crimes-- especially certain deviance-based crimes-- against children. In fact, this person who joked about being an accessory (actually, an outright accomplice) to the crime would be brutalized by the inmates in jail or prison really quickly-- inmates don't like sexual crimes, especially any sexual-deviance crimes against children.
As Jerry Sandusky will learn and my sister told me that one inmate learned (In fact, our friend told her that he heard that the inmate was murdered, dismembered, and bagged that he was so despised.), even the hardest of criminals dislike and hate the hardest-of-the-hardest criminals.
And tzedek-- karma, justice-- does bite.
As Jerry Sandusky will learn and my sister told me that one inmate learned (In fact, our friend told her that he heard that the inmate was murdered, dismembered, and bagged that he was so despised.), even the hardest of criminals dislike and hate the hardest-of-the-hardest criminals.
And tzedek-- karma, justice-- does bite.
Here's Something Interesting...
So some search keywords on my blog stats turned this up:
Now I'm going to see if Elizabeth Kostka is a cousin. Keep in mind that Elizabeth Helen Trudniak married Paul Frank Kostka; and they had a son, Paul Frank Kostka, Jr.. I emailed her to see if we are related and will let you know what happens.
elizabethkostka@aol.com
|
2
|
covel sundbrae wedding
|
1
|
geraldo rivera's producers
|
1
|
Now I'm going to see if Elizabeth Kostka is a cousin. Keep in mind that Elizabeth Helen Trudniak married Paul Frank Kostka; and they had a son, Paul Frank Kostka, Jr.. I emailed her to see if we are related and will let you know what happens.
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Just a Few Examples: You Might Be Antimissionary If...
- You don't believe in Jesus.
- You not only don't believe in Jesus, but you don't tolerate that anyone else does.
- You've sat or you'd sit shiva even for your Anusi loved ones, or who you now consider ex-loved ones.
- You like to pretend that Jews for Jesus (Hebrew Christians, etc.) aren't Jewish and are nothing but Pseudo-Jewish Anti Semites who know nothing about or of Jewish culture (as someone accused me of).
- You allow anyone to believe in anyone or anything but Jesus; or if you're more extreme, only Judaism and especially not in Jesus.
- You support groups such as Yad L'Achim, the Jewish Internet Defense Force, the Jewish Defense League, and Jews for Judaism; or on the other extreme, the Union of Reform Judaism and Central Conference of American "Rabbi"s, and the Anti Defamation League. You also support Antimissionary and other haredi and Likud, or URJ and CCAR policy.
- You devote whole websites or sections of websites to Antimissionarism.
- You link to Antimissionary websites.
- You go to Messianic Jewish websites (e.g., Jews for Jesus' website) just to attack and persecute Messianic Jews.
- Most or all of your life is devoted to being an Antimissionary.
- You don't allow Messianic Jews and those tolerant of Messianic Jews to have freedom of speech, religion, the press, or other freedoms.
- Your favorite sexual position is either "Missionary" by a different name or not "Missionary". (I'm sure that there are Antmissionarys like that.)
- You sit in a yeshiva and are a haredi talmid l'talmud-Talmud Bavli, yom l'yom v'laila l'laila; and read Tanakh only in an Antimissionary way.
- You support terrorism against those such as Ami Ortiz.
- You burn or otherwise destroy sefirot such as full copies of Tanakh-- Torah, Nevi'im, Ketuvim, Brit Chadashah; and you complain about Jewish and other Christian sefirot, websites, etc. when nobody's forcing you to engage or utilize them.
- You constantly twist out of context or have never even read-- and still twist out of context-- Brit Chadashah.
- You blame Paul for saying that Yeshua ze Mashiach when Paul just affirmed what Yeshua said.
- You're Abraham Foxman, Skylar Curtis, Noah David Simon, David Appletree, or any person or organization who supports them.
- You compare every Jewish Christian to or stereotype every Jewish Christian as Pablo Christiani and Nicolas Donin; or you even you compare Jews for Jesus to the Nazis who tried to destroy all Jews, including Messianic Jews.
- You consider Messianic Jewish websites and organizations as hate, impostor, or similar types of websites and organizations.
- You spit, plug your ears, usr hand sanitizer, or whatever else every time you hear the name "Jesus", see a picture of Jesus, etc.
I Clean Out Spam Comments Every Once In a While
As I've said, I don't have the same control spam comments on Blogger that I do on YouTube. Besides, the spam comments which I just cleaned out of my spam box were not worth responding to, full of revisionism (including Antimissionarism), etc.. As I've said, I'm very libertarian and let people see even spam comments at their own premonition and behest when I can. But when I can't choose to leave spam comments up and mark them as spam, then I won't publish them (unless I have to respond to them for whatever reason).
Saturday, November 12, 2011
You Can Like A Person's Product Without Liking Them...
For example; I like Craig Rivera's reporting on "Geraldo at Large", but I do not like the man. For one, he is unbelievably liberal: even on his own Facebook page, he likes such shows as "The Daily Show" and the whole of OWN (Oprah Winfrey Network). For two, he supported Barack Obama in 2008 (Don't believe me? Look it up yourself.). For three, is not friends with his own children on Facebook; and we were actually friends on Facebook for a while, but he defriended me (and I maintain my claim that we're-- however distantly related-- related until I die or get Raptured. I didn't even bring up that he and Geraldo look too strikingly like Dad and Uncle Gary-- Michelle did. Besides, we're all Jewish and from the same area-- and there was an Abe Friedman in Suwalki who posted on Ancestry.com; so we're distantly related, Craig-- get used to it. And as I said, I don't care for money just because I'm a relative. Besides, I'm so used crazy relatives; that if and when I a connection to Craig Rivera, I might laugh-- I have plenty of meshugene mispoche who aren't talking to me and others.).
As for Matt and Marcela "Mia" J. Danilowicz, I'm still boycotting and encouraging the boycotting of their products-- no matter how much I like or I'd like their products-- because they're known and confirmed family members who need to be taught that you don't get away withreating and abusing family members in any way, shape, or form.
By the way, the they-look-alike point was first made in "The Fam'ly and Parodies" album. I was joking about two uncles with cigars, and...
As for Matt and Marcela "Mia" J. Danilowicz, I'm still boycotting and encouraging the boycotting of their products-- no matter how much I like or I'd like their products-- because they're known and confirmed family members who need to be taught that you don't get away withreating and abusing family members in any way, shape, or form.
By the way, the they-look-alike point was first made in "The Fam'ly and Parodies" album. I was joking about two uncles with cigars, and...
 |
| Not my fault that a joke about two uncles who do smoke turned into the fact that Geraldo and Craig all too look like... |
 |
| And this was taken on July 22, 1989. The "Life" photo above was taken on or around April 18, 1994-- same time period, 5-year-difference.
And the baby (now 17-year-old Austin Rivera) looks like my cousin Scott (who is a year and some months younger) when he was a baby (and I sadly do not have a baby picture of Scott, although I remember what he looked like-- I was about to be six when he was born).
And distant cousins can and do often look alike-- so there you go (and Mia might always hate how she looks like Aunt Mary and Kayla, by the way, since I mentioned it; but I don't care if she likes my observations or not).
|
Mean But Poigniant (And Maybe Funny)
@H8ersH8enManwell
(And Michael Jackson was a pedophile. That the boy was scared into retracting his statement when he clearly saw viteligo in a certain area, as he described, is sad.).
(But who knows what he was doing before the Pepsi-commercial set fire?)
Friday, November 11, 2011
I'm Not the Most Prolific or Popular Blogger, But...
I generate some fans, followers (official and unofficial), and even some haters and trolls. I blog enough to get my point across and reach what audience I can, and I can say even what my mom and sister don't like that I say here (and my mom doesn't like half of the stuff that I say). So, as long as I have enough of an audience who's reading my points (provided that they find my blog in ethical, moral, and legal ways) and can have a space to avoid my mom's and sister's radars, I'm content.
Thursday, November 10, 2011
Two Sacrifices and A Stumbling Point For Many Non-Messianic Jews
So which is or are what the korban Yeshua relates to? HaAkedah v'HaKorban Pesach or HaKorban-Haben-Melekh-shel-Mo'av? Parsha Vayera contains Parsha v'Haftarah Vayera, Bereshit 18-22 and Malakhim Bet 4. Beginning with a parsha m'Parsha Vayera:
So, which is hakorban Yeshua? HaAkedah-Akedot or avodah zarah? Look at the differences: Yeshua is Jewish and came to save Israel. Mo'av attempted to destroy Yisra'el v'Yehudah. Yeshua offered himself, fulfilling "“My son, God will provide for Himself the lamb for a burnt offering.”"-- and only G-d can die to save others from sin. Hamelekh-Mo'avi was not offering his firstborn son for selfless reasons but to try to win a war against the Yisra'elim v'Yehudim.
Also, hakorban Yeshua was wanted by those who thought that he committed avodah zarah. "Then he took his eldest son who would have reigned in his place, and offered him as a burnt offering upon the wall; and there was great indignation against Israel. So they departed from him and returned to their own land." The original Hebrew reads, "Vaiyikkach et-benov habbechor asher-yimloch tachtav vaiya'alehu olah al-hachomah vayhi ke·tzef-gadol al-Yisra'el vaiyis'u me'alav vaiyashuvu la'aretz. פ"
'Al could mean, as one translator put it, "upon" as in that Israel was disgusted. "Following this, such great anger came upon Isra'el that they left him and went back to their own land." So they were disgusted with the korban of haben shel hamelekh-Mo'avi.
Many Yehudim see hakorban Yeshua as parallel to the korban-haben shel hamelekh-Mo'avi. For example, "Who died on the cross? Was it Jesus-the-god, or was it Jesus-the-human? If it was Jesus-the-god, Jews don't believe that God can die. If it was Jesus-the-human, then all Christians have in the death of Jesus was a human death, a human sacrifice. Jews believe that God hates the very idea of human sacrifice."
But these Yehudim miss what Avraham said plus:
HaMelekh-Adonai is not just HaMelekh-Adonai; but also Adonai, and not by coincidence. Therefore, to the Antimissionaries in particular:
Then he said, “Look, the fire and the wood, but where is the lamb for a burnt offering?”Then m'Malakhim Bet, right before HaHaftarah:
8 And Abraham said, “My son, God will provide for Himself the lamb for a burnt offering.” So the two of them went together.
9 Then they came to the place of which God had told him. And Abraham built an altar there and placed the wood in order; and he bound Isaac his son and laid him on the altar, upon the wood. 10 And Abraham stretched out his hand and took the knife to slay his son.
11 But the Angel of the LORD called to him from heaven and said, “Abraham, Abraham!”
So he said, “Here I am.”
12 And He said, “Do not lay your hand on the lad, or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.”
13 Then Abraham lifted his eyes and looked, and there behind him was a ram caught in a thicket by its horns. So Abraham went and took the ram, and offered it up for a burnt offering instead of his son. 14 And Abraham called the name of the place, The-LORD-Will-Provide;[b] as it is said to this day, “In the Mount of the LORD it shall be provided.”
15 Then the Angel of the LORD called to Abraham a second time out of heaven, 16 and said: “By Myself I have sworn, says the LORD, because you have done this thing, and have not withheld your son, your only son— 17 blessing I will bless you, and multiplying I will multiply your descendants as the stars of the heaven and as the sand which is on the seashore; and your descendants shall possess the gate of their enemies. 18 In your seed all the nations of the earth shall be blessed, because you have obeyed My voice.” 19 So Abraham returned to his young men, and they rose and went together to Beersheba; and Abraham dwelt at Beersheba.
20 Now it happened in the morning, when the grain offering was offered, that suddenly water came by way of Edom, and the land was filled with water.
21 And when all the Moabites heard that the kings had come up to fight against them, all who were able to bear arms and older were gathered; and they stood at the border. 22 Then they rose up early in the morning, and the sun was shining on the water; and the Moabites saw the water on the other side as red as blood. 23 And they said, “This is blood; the kings have surely struck swords and have killed one another; now therefore, Moab, to the spoil!”
24 So when they came to the camp of Israel, Israel rose up and attacked the Moabites, so that they fled before them; and they entered their land, killing the Moabites. 25 Then they destroyed the cities, and each man threw a stone on every good piece of land and filled it; and they stopped up all the springs of water and cut down all the good trees. But they left the stones of Kir Haraseth intact. However the slingers surrounded and attacked it.
26 And when the king of Moab saw that the battle was too fierce for him, he took with him seven hundred men who drew swords, to break through to the king of Edom, but they could not. 27 Then he took his eldest son who would have reigned in his place, and offered him as a burnt offering upon the wall; and there was great indignation against Israel. So they departed from him and returned to their own land.
So, which is hakorban Yeshua? HaAkedah-Akedot or avodah zarah? Look at the differences: Yeshua is Jewish and came to save Israel. Mo'av attempted to destroy Yisra'el v'Yehudah. Yeshua offered himself, fulfilling "“My son, God will provide for Himself the lamb for a burnt offering.”"-- and only G-d can die to save others from sin. Hamelekh-Mo'avi was not offering his firstborn son for selfless reasons but to try to win a war against the Yisra'elim v'Yehudim.
Also, hakorban Yeshua was wanted by those who thought that he committed avodah zarah. "Then he took his eldest son who would have reigned in his place, and offered him as a burnt offering upon the wall; and there was great indignation against Israel. So they departed from him and returned to their own land." The original Hebrew reads, "Vaiyikkach et-benov habbechor asher-yimloch tachtav vaiya'alehu olah al-hachomah vayhi ke·tzef-gadol al-Yisra'el vaiyis'u me'alav vaiyashuvu la'aretz. פ"
'Al could mean, as one translator put it, "upon" as in that Israel was disgusted. "Following this, such great anger came upon Isra'el that they left him and went back to their own land." So they were disgusted with the korban of haben shel hamelekh-Mo'avi.
Many Yehudim see hakorban Yeshua as parallel to the korban-haben shel hamelekh-Mo'avi. For example, "Who died on the cross? Was it Jesus-the-god, or was it Jesus-the-human? If it was Jesus-the-god, Jews don't believe that God can die. If it was Jesus-the-human, then all Christians have in the death of Jesus was a human death, a human sacrifice. Jews believe that God hates the very idea of human sacrifice."
But these Yehudim miss what Avraham said plus:
But the Angel of the LORD called to him from heaven and said, “Abraham, Abraham!”
So he said, “Here I am.”
12 And He said, “Do not lay your hand on the lad, or do anything to him; for now I know that you fear God, since you have not withheld your son, your only son, from Me.”
HaMelekh-Adonai is not just HaMelekh-Adonai; but also Adonai, and not by coincidence. Therefore, to the Antimissionaries in particular:
Romans 11:8-10
New King James Version (NKJV)
8 Just as it is written:
“ God has given them a spirit of stupor,
Eyes that they should not see
And ears that they should not hear,
To this very day.”[a]
9 And David says:
“ Let their table become a snare and a trap,
A stumbling block and a recompense to them.
10 Let their eyes be darkened, so that they do not see,
And bow down their back always.”[b]
Also:
“ God has given them a spirit of stupor,
Eyes that they should not see
And ears that they should not hear,
To this very day.”[a]
9 And David says:
“ Let their table become a snare and a trap,
A stumbling block and a recompense to them.
10 Let their eyes be darkened, so that they do not see,
And bow down their back always.”[b]
Also:
Mark 12:9-11
New King James Version (NKJV)
9 “Therefore what will the owner
of the vineyard do? He will come and destroy the vinedressers, and give the
vineyard to others. 10 Have you not
even read this Scripture:
‘ The stone which the builders rejected
Has become the chief cornerstone.
11 This was the LORD’s doing,
And it is marvelous in our eyes’?”[a]
‘ The stone which the builders rejected
Has become the chief cornerstone.
11 This was the LORD’s doing,
And it is marvelous in our eyes’?”[a]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)