Mostly Offbeat: Just A Thought That "Momma"'s Had Of Late

At this point, "Momma" thinks that she's written enough about needing a helpmate for herself and a "Daddy" for Reilly¹. For her and Reilly's—and, she supposes, quite a few others'—sakes, she'll stop writing about the subject for right now and leave it at that (and in God's hands in any case)—notwithstanding that the subject in of itself² will bug her everyday until she gets clear answers about it, and will be on her mind every day—after all, neither she nor anyone else can change God's will; and neither she nor anyone else can force God's will to be in anyone's favor or disfavor.

In addition, "Momma" in a way feels sorry that she ever wrote those blog entries—she did, for example, seem to come off as desparate. Nonetheless, she just wants the best for herself—including to be a better "Momma" to Reilly—and Reilly, and she wants clear answers.

As has been said, then:

³יהי רצון יהוה לעשות רצונו.

Meanwhile, "Momma" will focus on other subjects concerning Reilly on which she's focused before.

¹ Not to mention implied whom she thinks that he might be (if God wills)
² And what she's mentioned about the subject (e.g., re God's will)
³ And "Momma" asks (and "Momma"'s sure that Reilly would ask) others to pray about it—and pray regarding other matters: e.g., for her and Reilly, and for all the pet owners and pets whom were directly affected by this weekend's riots in Charlottesville and other disasters.

Excerpt From My Upcoming Book: It Began In the Toponymical City of Dunilavičy

I don’t know how I didn’t know other than that I wasn’t told that I’m Jewish—let alone the whole backstory behind why we passed for gentiles. What I do know is that I should’ve known when someone asked me if I am—that is, if I am related to Kirk Douglas. I honestly remembered that “Danilovich” was a patronymic in his case, and I told the person that “Danilovich” is a patronymic in his case and not related to “Daniłowicz” in my paternal family’s case.

Then I relooked at the Wikipedia entry—“Demsky” wasn’t his birth surname after all, as I found out. After that, I saw the family resemblance—and the “Czarnecki buttchin” turned out to be the Danilovich-dimpled chin, I figured out. Then after that, I read about how Kirk Douglas raped Natalie Wood—and I should’ve known that I’m related to Kirk Douglas even if I’d only read about that.

Leave to the Daniloviches to wreak havoc on the world—and my own side of the family had and has done plenty of that—and each other—and even many (if not most) of us that try to be good aren’t innocent of having wreaked some havoc. We also have havoc wreaked on us by others besides each other—as I say, “If you’re a Danilovich, you either are trouble, attract trouble, or [have a case of] both[instances —that is, that you both are trouble and attract trouble].” (By the way, I used to say “crazy” instead of “trouble”, but then I considered how “crazy” is ableist language.)

Meanwhile, as I’ve also said, there’s something in that Danilovich water—and it all (apparently, anyway) began in Dunilavičy, Belarus (Duniłowicze, Białorus), to where I’ve traced it back (thus, why I say “apparently”: it could be Daniłowicze in what is now Podlaskie, Poland or another Daniłowicze or Dunilavičy).

Using JewishGen and Google Maps as well as other sources (including YadVashem, since I ended up finding—for example—a record for an Esther Chernetzki from Chausy—the birth city of Herschel “Harry” Danilovich), I’ve traced my Danilovich/Daniłowicz from Dunilavičy to Podlaskie, Poland’s Lipsk nad Bierbzą as such—this is, for all intents and purposes, a very-rough tracing, by the way. Also by the way, keep factors such as the following (and I think that you can tell that I’ve researched all of this and also figured out quite a bit):

1.    There was no traveling outside of the Russian Pale and back to it without permission to be outside of the Russian Pale in the first place.

2.    Per JewishGen, Lipsk shifted from being in Borisov Uyezd in Minsk Gubernia to Augustów Uyezd in Suwałki Gubernia by 1900.

3.    The shift from being openly Jewish to being Anusim seems to have come from Abram “Wojciech” and Marianna Kruszyńska Daniłowicz when a son named Mendel died in Filipów in 1841. Their daughter who was the mother of my paternal grandfather’s paternal grandfather was baptized as “Katarzyna” in 1843.

4.    In Wigry its subordinate parish, no way was “prenuptial agreement” going to mean anything but “ketubah”. Also in Wigry and its subordinate parish, parents didn’t “neglect” baptizing any child for four years!

5.    The Daniloviches, Chernetzkis, etc. (e.g., Kruszyńskis, Andrulewiczes, and Margiewiczes) all either somehow heard of each otherand/or were otherwise connected prior to ending up in what is now Podlaskie Voivodeship.

6.    Related to the aforementioned: branches of the Daniloviches, etc. also ended up together in Mount Carmel, Pennsylvania—in other words, Great-Granddad Czarnecki’s closer sides of his parents’ families that immigrated to Pennsylvania stuck together.

[Not previewed here]

The next few screenshots are from JewishGen. As I’ve said when I’ve written about my family history other times, they—despite what they claim—cannot copyright the information itself, although they can indeed copyright the database technology that they use for the JewishGen databases. Besides, that information was known and/or discoverable long before they were founded—let alone before I was born!

[Not previewed here]

As for the rest of my Danilovich side’s story, that can be read elsewhere. So can the story of Kirk Douglas’ side.

PS As I’ve said, I wish that Lana Wood would name Kirk Douglas before he dies—and I wish that she would name Kirk Douglas before it’s too late for her to name her sister’s rapist!

Two "Pood"-i-ful "Gwirls"!

Before (Since "Momma" was able to get "Before" pictures of Reilly)

After, beginning at pickup time

Let Japan and South Korea Fight Back Against North Korea, Because...

1. Japan and South Korea are the main countries in harm's way because of North Korea and China. Besides, the U.S. Armed Forces are overstretched as is.
2. Aspiring dictator Tr**p is allied with China and has praised Kim Jong-Un, and Tr**p is also allied with Russia. Besides, as I've said before, Tr**p plays nobody's puppet. Thus, Tr**p is trying to cover his own trail with his bluster and put the United States along with Japan and South Korea in harm's way. 
3. Tr**p is, at the least, no different than Kim Jong-Un, anyway; and, at the most, worse than Kim-Jong Un—do I or others need to rehash that Tr**p, e.g., keeps a copy of ******'s speeches by his bedside?
4. Given Tr**p's White Supremacist attitude and Guam's Non-White majority (and don't think that Tr**p doesn't know about that), Tr**p's at the very least not going to care if the mostly-Chamorro Guamanian population gets hit by North Korea. Also, Guam is a United States territory as opposed to a United States state. 

There are other reasons as well. Nonetheless, the four aforementioned reasons are sufficient-enough-to-mention reasons. By the way and as I have to reiterate, don't think that Tr**p doesn't know about Guam's demographics—anyone can look up Guam's demographic information in the "CIA World Factbook", and a racist and so-called "POTUS" like Tr**p would know about that as "POTUS". In other words, don't be fooled by someone as bigoted, narcissistic, and sociopathic (e.g., maliciously-shrewd and -calculative) as Tr**p wherein Guam is concerned or in any other case.

At Least Before Reilly's And Camille's Naptime...

Both of them actually cooperated (to at least some extent) in getting ready for naptime. Reilly actually found a "potty spot" when "Momma" took her outside after she rang the bell, and Camille (to whom "to at least some extent" actually applies) voluntary got into her crate (instead of letting "Auntie Nicole" get her stuff on her to take her "[to go] potty", though).

Of course, mazel usually—as the saying goes—doesn't strike twice in a day. After all, Reilly had to insist on not "find[ing] a potty spot" when "Momma" took her outside for the second time. At least Camille let "Auntie Nicole" get her harness and leash on her, and she "[found] a potty spot".

More "Peedy" Mishaps And A Stubborn Cam!

As if Reilly's "peedying" in "Momma"'s bed wasn't enough, Reilly refused to "find a potty spot" when "Momma" took her to "peedy". Not only that, but she would've chased a butterfly to eat if "Momma" had let her chase it—and having licked her lips from eating "nasties" and watching that butterfly, Reilly was ready to consider that butterfly a snack!

As for Camille, she refused to even let "Auntie Nicole" get her harness and leash on her. She also chose to growl at her when she tried to reach into her crate to get her and get her stuff onto her, and she growled at her again when she took over grooming for "Mom-Mom" and had to roll her over on her belly!

As for Reilly in terms of grooming, in contrast, Reilly was a relative angel for "Momma" and got one treat for finally coming onto the couch and another for letting "Momma" groom her. Reilly also didn't leave a hashtag mark on "Momma"/"Auntie Nicole" like Camille did:

Blue filter and circle for clarity. Original caption: "Hashtag: #YepCamsscratchesreallylooklikethat "

Cam desperately wanted the last part of the second treat for her, and at least "Auntie Nicole" was able to get one quick swipe at her with the electric toothbrush!

With All Due Respect To Sean Hannity...

In light of dangerous NKorea threat, I'm stopping all petty political disagreements for at least next 12 hours. Let's see what others do.

— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) August 8, 2017

And then later...

Tonight on #Hannity I’m joined by @newtgingrich, @AmbJohnBolton, @JaySekulow, @OliverNorthFNC, @SheriffClarke, @MichaelGWaltz and more

— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) August 9, 2017

There is a damning new discovery by the American Center for Law and Justice... I’ll have more at 10pm #Hannity

— Sean Hannity (@seanhannity) August 9, 2017

Sure, no politicking...give me a break. Also, Trump praised Kim Jong-Un as well as his collaborators such as Putin. Nonetheless, you just can't stop, can you?

Sean, you're only doing the RINOs as well as the Anti-American wings of the Democratic and other parties a favor—and by Trump, as they say, you've been had! Besides, as I and others have asked, what would the Sean Hannity of back then say to the Sean Hannity of now? Change isn't always for the better, after all, and I suspect that the Sean Hannity of back then would not like the Sean Hannity of now—and he'd say that you need a "An American Carol" experience in real life!