: Even as I saw said yesterday on Twitter (or do I have to cite that to prove that I'm not a liar? :-P), "intellectual property" is crap. The concept of "intellectual property" says, "F**k you, G-d. We don't care that nothing is new or that everything belongs to you."
"When you're plagiarizing, you're kidnapping someone's ideas," as the lecture states. Yes, you're actually robbing G-d. Again, everything belongs to Him in the end. Ann Stuart really caused the problems. The Copyright Act of 1708-1710 really caused problems. It basically said, "F**k Solomon." Furthermore, the Copyright Act of 1708-1710 said, "F**k G-d. I don't care that G-d said that nothing is new & everything belongs to Him."
So, as to whether Ann Stuart was a Christian Queen's quite questionable. She didn't trust G-d enough to say, "You'll take care of stealers." Reading for the MLA/APA?Kate Turabian/Ann Stuart zealots, by the way:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ecc.%201:9,%20Psalm%2024:1&version=NKJV
(Or is a link not enough? :-P).
But like they care: In this lecture, she talks about "too many direct quotes" and blog sources. So much for nothing new under the sun and that there are still people to trust (and using discernment to figure out who to trust), huh? By the way, if you use this, I'll sue you and your mother's sister's paternal brother's cousin's maternal sister's mother to whom you passed on these ideas for plagiarism :-P (as has been said, so much for the free exchange of ideas, huh?).
"When you're plagiarizing, you're kidnapping someone's ideas," as the lecture states. Yes, you're actually robbing G-d. Again, everything belongs to Him in the end. Ann Stuart really caused the problems. The Copyright Act of 1708-1710 really caused problems. It basically said, "F**k Solomon." Furthermore, the Copyright Act of 1708-1710 said, "F**k G-d. I don't care that G-d said that nothing is new & everything belongs to Him."
So, as to whether Ann Stuart was a Christian Queen's quite questionable. She didn't trust G-d enough to say, "You'll take care of stealers." Reading for the MLA/APA?Kate Turabian/Ann Stuart zealots, by the way:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Ecc.%201:9,%20Psalm%2024:1&version=NKJV
(Or is a link not enough? :-P).
But like they care: In this lecture, she talks about "too many direct quotes" and blog sources. So much for nothing new under the sun and that there are still people to trust (and using discernment to figure out who to trust), huh? By the way, if you use this, I'll sue you and your mother's sister's paternal brother's cousin's maternal sister's mother to whom you passed on these ideas for plagiarism :-P (as has been said, so much for the free exchange of ideas, huh?).
No comments:
Post a Comment