.gif)
"Netanyahu in Nazi Uniform" may not be a far-off Photoshop. Beware Benjamin Netanyahu, Likud, and those like Miriam Woelke: they supports a racist, revisionist book known as Talmud Bavli. Miriam Woelke goes on to say:
"Israeli Left, if it does not fit you to be in Israel, from Gaza, Ramallah or to
Ahmadinejad - there's land! There you will
see after a few seconds, what your friends-- Arab terrorists-- do with you . If
you're lucky, the head comes off quickly. If you get unlucky,
you feel the whole range of torture."
(via Google Translate, corrected and edited for context by me)
Miriam Woelke goes on to state on her "About Me" sidebar:
"After years of living in Jerusalem, I recently left the city and moved first to
the north and now to Tel Aviv. Nevertheless, I am still writing about Jerusalem but also
include many other places in Israel. Until some years ago, I was a
Yeshiva (Michlalah) student. First with the national religious and later with the
Litvishe. First with the national religious and later with the
Litvishe. Also got in contact with Chassidut and this subject and
lifestyle has never left me."
There you go-- Miriam Woelke learned and supports the Jewish Supremacist, revisionist, racist, anti-gentile Talmud Bavli. Since she supports a book that even those who were not supposed to be cohanim but were cohanim wrote (e.g., 1 M'lakhim 12:30-32 and Nehemia Gordon's Yom Teru'ah). In fact, Nehemia notes that Miriam Woelke supports outright revisionism and racism:
"During their sojourn in Babylonia our ancestors began to use the pagan
Babylonian month names, a fact readily admitted in the Talmud:
“The names of the months came up with them from
Babylonia.” (Jerusalem Talmud, Rosh Hashanah 1:2 56d)"
Now here comes the part where Nehemia notes that outright racism is involved; and he notes it implicity:
"At the same time, the form of Judaism commonly practiced today is not authentic Judaism but "Talmudism". The Talmudists corrupt the true message of the Hebrew Scriptures by adding the teachings of the Rabbis found in the "Talmud", which they claim were revealed by God.[7] This despite the fact that there is not a single reference to the Talmud in the entire Hebrew Scriptures. The authentic Hebrew religion is that which is taught by the Creator Himself in the Hebrew Scriptures without addition or subtraction, as it is written: "Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall you diminish anything from it, that you may keep the commandments of YHWH your God" (Deuteronomy 4:2)."
"The Talmudists corrupt the true message of the Hebrew Scriptures...." How with racism? That's where some examples from Yaron Yadan come in. And for example:
"The sages of the Mishnah ruled that a Jew is forbidden to board his animal in a gentile's animal boarding facility, because gentiles customarily have intercourse with animals (even dogs), and since according to the Torah even gentiles are forbidden to have sexual relations with animals (one of the Noahide commandments), one is forbidden to lead them into sin.
The Talmudic sages discussed this topic at length, arguing: if gentiles customarily have sexual relations with animals, why is one permitted to buy an animal from a gentile and bring it as a sacrifice in the Holy Temple? An animal which has been bred is not permitted as a sacrifice upon the altar. They answered this question: gentiles are careful not to have relations with their own animals; the female so they do not make her unable to bear offspring and the male so he does not wither away. But an animal which belongs to a Jew -- it would not matter if they caused a Jew's animal to become infertile or to wither away, so the gentile would have sexual relations with a Jew's animal..."
Tractate Avodah Zarah, Chapter 2 does confirm this:
"CHAPTER II
"MISHNAH. ONE SHOULD NOT PLACE CATTLE IN HEATHENS' INNS,9 BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF IMMORAL PRACTICE
WITH THEM. A WOMAN SHOULD NOT BE ALONE WITH THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF
LEWDNESS, NOR SHOULD A MAN BE ALONE WITH THEM, BECAUSE THEY ARE SUSPECTED OF
SHEDDING BLOOD.
"GEMARA. The following was cited in contradiction: One may buy
of them cattle for a sacrifice, and it need not be feared lest it committed, or
had been used for, an immoral act, or had been designated as an offering to
idols, or had been worshipped.1 Now we are
quite right not to fear about its having been designated as an offering to idols
or having been made an object of worship, since if it had been so designated or
worshipped, its owner would not have sold it; but we surely ought to fear as to
committing an immoral act!2 — Said R. Tahlifa
in the name of R. Shila b. Abina in the name of Rab: A heathen would have regard
for his cattle, lest it becomes barren.3 This
would indeed hold good in the case of female cattle but what answer would you
give in the case of males? — Said R. Kahana: Because it has a deteriorating
effect on their flesh. Then what about that [Baraitha] which has been taught:
'One may buy cattle of any heathen shepherd'; ought we not to fear lest he used
it for an immoral purpose?4 — The heathen
shepherd would be afraid of forfeiting his fee. What then about this [other
Baraitha] which has been taught: 'One should not entrust cattle to a heathen
shepherd';5 why not assume that the heathen
shepherd would be afraid of forfeiting his fee? — They fear detection by one
another since they know a good deal about it, but they are not afraid of us who
do not know much about it. Rabbah said: This is what the popular proverb says.
'As the stylus penetrates the stone so one cunning mind detects another.' In
that case, neither should we buy male cattle6
from women, for fear of their having used them for immoral practice!"
