The "Nicole Factor" Is Online

Welcome to the Nicole Factor at blogspot.com.
Powered By Blogger

The Nicole Factor

Search This Blog

Stage 32

My LinkedIn Profile

About Me

TwitThis

TwitThis

Twitter

Messianic Bible (As If the Bible Isn't)

My About.Me Page

Views

Facebook and Google Page

Reach Me On Facebook!

Talk To Me on Fold3!

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Who Is or Will Be the Antichrist?

The Antichrist, sadly, has to be a Patrilineal Jew descended from both Judah and Joseph, and a Karaite--this will be the only type of Jew who will convince my people that he is Mashiach. How do we know this?

  1. In Non-Messianic Judaism, there is the thought that Mashiach will be literally descended from both Yehudah (which is Scriptural) and Yosef (perhaps because Yosef was Ya'akov's favorite son and because Yosef stated, "Hinei, I have dreamed a chalom more; and, hinei, the shemesh and the yarei’ach and the eleven kokhavim bowed down to me." This thought does not come from Scripture itself, although we do see that Yeshua descended from (by adoption) a literal Ya'akov and Yosef--but they will not believe Yeshua, although (for all that we know) he could've been a descendant of Yosef through his matrilineal lines (since we don't know who Maryam's and Yosef's mothers were. We do know that Maryam was a kohenet through one of her matrilineal lines, though. Keep in mind that the so-called "rabbis" allowed intertribal marriages and even hired lo-kohen "kohanim"  in direct contradistinction against B'midbar 36. By the way, now you know of whom the "rabbis" are spiritual descendants.).
  2. Karaite Judaism will be practiced. "Then will I sprinkle mayim tehorim upon you, and ye shall be tahor; from all your tum’a, and from all your gillulim (idols), will I make you tahor."
  3. As Asher Romeo ["Romero"] ben Israel once pointed out, P'rushi Judaism is Eastern. "Therefore Thou hast abandoned Thy people Bais Ya’akov, because they have found their fullness from Kedem (the East), and practice divination like the Pelishtim, and they clasp hands contentedly with yaldei nochrim (children of foreigners)." We do indeed see this with, e.g. (as Asher noted or may have noted), Zoroastrianism (an influence on the Talmud, which Asher noted), Hinduism (HindJewism, anybody?), Buddhism (BuJews, anyone?), Kabbalh, etc..
In conclusion, the Antichrist has to be a Patrilineal Jew whom is a descendant of Yehudah and Yosef, and a Karaite.


Tuesday, February 5, 2013

The AFP and Self-Hating YNet Threaten Ashkenazi Jews Again

With this article, I break down lie after lie, after lie:

"Jews of European origin are a mix of ancestries, with many hailing from tribes in the Caucasus who converted to Judaism and created an empire that lasted half a millennium, according to a gene study."

As Kevin Alan Brook and several studies state, Ashkenazic Jews are Israelites who are descended from other Israelite Diasporans--such as (especially in the case of Central and Eastern Ashkenazi Jews) Sephardi and Western Ashkenazi Israelites (Leave Southeastern Europe--e.g., the Balkans--alone for a minute. Balkan Jews, for instance, are often considered to be Sephardim.).

"According to the so-called Rhineland Hypothesis, Ashkenazim descended from Jews who progressively fled Palestine after the Muslim conquest of 638 AD.

"They settled in southern Europe and then, in the late Middle Ages, about 50,000 of them moved from the Rhineland in Germany into eastern Europe, according to the hypothesis...."

We, as YNet omitted, also fled--for instance--the Pseudo-Christian, Anti-Semitic hotbed of the Justinian Byzantine Empire. We were also in Germany, and even Rome and Greece, before the Middle Ages. So, we couldn't have just arbitrarily settled in Germany and then picked up to move on.

"It would mean that the population of Eastern European Jews leapt from 50,000 in the 15th century to around eight million at the start of the 20th century."

It probably did. But how many Jews were murdered and killed due--e.g.--the Inquisition, the Bubonic Plague (e.g., Asher aben Turiel), abortion (which Talmud Bavli brazenly allows), and (on all sides) alleged or actual apostasy (And don't think that murderous groups like Yad L'Achim didn't exist back then.)?

"That birth rate would have been 10 times greater than that of the local non-Jewish population. And it would have occurred despite economic hardship, disease, wars and pogroms that ravaged Jewish communities."

See the above analysis. Also, the most-obvious counterside to Anti-Messianic murderers would be the Pseudo-Messianic murderers--and their names get thrown around enough (as if Anti-Messianic groups never have committed murder); so you can just Google terms such as "Jewish converts to Christianity", and find plenty of names which are used to intolerantly and disingenuously blanket all Messianic Jews.  

"Seeking new light in the argument, a study published in the British journal Genome Biology and Evolution, compares the genomes of 1,287 unrelated individuals who hail from eight Jewish and 74 non-Jewish populations..."

The study was clearly biased from the get-go. A better study would have had, e.g., 1,312 individuals with 41 Jewish communities and 41 gentile communities involved (74+8=82; 82*16=1,312; 82/2 = 41. On the other hand, 1, 287/82=~15.7.). The study would have, thus, been balanced among Jew and gentile.

"Among European Jews, Elhaik found ancestral signatures that pointed clearly to the Caucasus and also, but to a smaller degree, the Middle East.
The results, said Elhaik, give sound backing for the rival theory – the "Khazarian Hypothesis."..."

Geneticist Elhaik "trawled through this small mountain of data in search of single changes in the DNA code that are linked to a group's geographical origins". He clearly didn't do his homework, and he's looking to be the next Arthur Koestler (who admitted to making up the most-prominent strain of the Anti-Semitic "Khazar Hypothesis") or the next Shlomo Sand.

""Yiddish, the language of Central and Eastern European Jews, began as a Slavic language" before being reclassified as High German, he notes."

Here's another example of Geneticist Elhaik not doing his homework. Yiddish (lit., "Jewish") is a Hebraic and Aramaic language that borrowed Germanic, Slavic, Khazarate, and other words and grammar structures. For example (and this is one point on which I question Kevin Alan Brook), "yarmukle" is not a Turkish word--"yarmukle" is a Yiddishization of "yira malka" ("awe of the King" in Aramaic").

I could give you the whole megillah, but you get the point (This means that you get the point even though I didn't cover every lie by the AFP and YNet.). Meanwhile, incidentally, I wonder (perhaps a little conspiratorially) if Ancestry.com isn't trying to push the "Khazar hypothesis" by saying that I'm 99% Eastern European and 1% "of uncertain ethnicity"--then again, their technology is in Beta mode; although they questionably link: 
  • Greece (which is part of Mediterranean Europe) 
  • Southeastern (Balkan--not Magyar, Slavic [e.g., Polish, Slovakian], Ruso [e.g., Russian, Ukrainian]) Europe
 and 
  • Non-existent "Belgarus" 
with Eastern (Magyar, Slavic, and Ruso) Europe (though, to be fair, the Russians really are their own people; since Russia is technically a subcontinent at the least, and its own continent at the greatest--just like the Middle East is really its own continent, and the same could be argued for India [if not the rest of South Asia with India]. Incidentally, one could argue the same for the United Kingdom or even lone, in-the-middle-of-the-ocean Iceland). By the way, the one existent Belgarus is in Iran--which is far from Eastern Europe.

Incidentally, "Andrulewicz" comes exclusively from Lithuania (and if you don't believe me, look up "Andrulewicz" and variants thereof on Jewish--you'll find that we began by sticking together in Stakliškės, even though we moved to Poland Proper, Ukraine, and the United States; and "Monka" is exclusively Ashkenazic Jewish in Poland. So, I know that (with other factors considered as well) I've got to be a heck of a lot more Jewish than Ancestry.com is saying. Then again (in other words, perhaps making the last statements not incidental), Geneticist Elhaik is probably (at best) using the same (hopefully-just-flawed) methods as Ancestry.com.

The AFP and YNet ought to be ashamed for sloppy, Anti-Semitic and Self-Hating, Arthur Koestler- and Shlomo Sand-like "journalism"--and (along with Ancestry.com and Geneticist Elhaik) putting Ashkenazic Jews like me in a bad position.

By the way--along with being murdered and killed--many Jews were not counted as Jews because we were Patrilineal Jews, and/or Anusim and/or Messianic Jews (and not counting us as Jews was and is akin to murdering us and/or killing us).

Saturday, February 2, 2013

When Bringing Criticims to Ancestry.com, Avoid Guys Like CulsenGenealogy


 This is to warn you about agenda-driven and feinshmeker genealogists who claim to be experts about everything pertaining to AncestryDNA, etc.. Watch out for them. For example (and in case CulsenGenealogy decides to be a smart aleck and delete his comments on http://www.youtube.com/all_comments?v=bKcutt1gPXs):


Nicole Czarnecki 21 hours ago
With all due respect, Kris, I'm going to be honest with you: AncestryDNA is a good starter test, but people who had taken it before my dad warned about problems that I should've believed them on before his results came back. For example, AncestryDNA links my dad's third cousin Kevin as his 5th-8th cousin with low (< 50%) confidence; and AncestryDNA counted Greece and "Belgarus" (whatever that is) as Eastern Europe. Use the AncestryDNA test as a starter test & stick with using the paper trail.
Reply  ·

...

CulsenGenealogy 2 days ago
I - like others whom study migration of the ancestors AND also realizes that our DNA is thousands of years old - am happy to see Kris make a video and say the same thing: your genetic history is NOT your immediate paper trail. Even if that immediate trail is up to 3-500 years ago. AND that we are the result of history in the making.
Reply  ·

Nicole Czarnecki 21 hours ago
That's what I thought, too--that people who were complaining about AncestryDNA "have no idea how genetic testing, and algorithms work.." and "I do not think a lot of people understand how these DNA tests work." (From TheGeneticGenealogist) Then I saw the results, and "Greece", the Balkans, and "Belgarus" as a part of Eastern Europe. Also see the comment about my cousin. As I said, use the AncestryDNA test as a starter test & stick with using the paper trail.
Reply  ·   in reply to CulsenGenealogy (Show the comment)

CulsenGenealogy 19 hours ago
FTDNA shares the same EE country break down as Ancestry : Eastern European (Poland, Greece, Macedonia, Slovakia, Hungary, Croatia, Romania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Ukraine, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Belarus, Moldova, Montenegro, Bulgaria, Belgarus, Kosovo)
I am not sure what you are trying to say? you clearly are not happy with Ancestry results, so perhaps you were looking for something specific? Deep genetics are just that. A paper trail can give you some names. DNA cannot lie.
Reply  ·   in reply to Nicole Czarnecki (Show the comment)

Nicole Czarnecki 6 hours ago
I didn't say that DNA lies; I said that AncestryDNA is not as accurate. They even admit that they're in Beta. Also, the Balkans are Southeastern Europe (way different than Eastern--Slavic, Magyar, and Ruso), and Greece is Mediterranean (often considered Western, not Eastern) Europe. Also, you never addressed my comment about my cousin and "Belgarus".
Reply  ·   in reply to CulsenGenealogy (Show the comment)

CulsenGenealogy 1 hour ago
I don't need to address anything, actually. You clearly are angry over what results you see, and are all over the internet raging about it. You just simply brought your newest rants to Kris Williams video blog.
You state that AncestryDNA is not as accurate, YET FTDNA uses the same countries, including 'Belgarus' - try looking up the history of that word. No. I will not help you. Again, you are looking for what YOU want to see, not what is there, and already known.
Reply  ·   in reply to Nicole Czarnecki (Show the comment)

Nicole Czarnecki 1 second ago
I've looked it up. "Belgarus" is a village in Iran. Nice try, though.
Reply  ·   in reply to CulsenGenealogy (Show the comment)

See http://www.thegeneticgenealogist.com/2012/04/02/a-review-of-ancestrydna-ancestry-coms-new-autosomal-dna-test/ for a sample of the warnings, for example. You can Google "AncestryDNA reviews", for example, as well.

Wednesday, January 30, 2013

Geraldo Rivera Is Not a Roman Catholic

Meanwhile, at least I know what I'm going to here on the podcast now. Anyway, being born to a Roman or other (e.g., Byzantine) Catholic does not make one a Catholic. Geraldo is a Reform Jew, although his dad (the late Cruz Rivera) was a Puerto Rican Roman Catholic. Geraldo himself has stated that he was raised "mostly Jewish". His mom, Lillian Rivera nee Lillie Friedman, is an Ethnic and Religious Jew; and (as Geraldo stated) she wanted Cruz to convert to Judaism if and when she married him, but "he never got around to" it or stopped being a Catholic layman.

Catholicism is not an ethnic grouping, whereas Jewishness is. Besides, I have a claim to Catholicism more than Geraldo does, but I myself am not a Catholic. Like Geraldo, though, I was born in an interfaith home--which eventually became a broken, divorced-parent, single-mom home. I, specifically, was born to an Anusi Ashkenazi dad and a mostly-Irish Roman-turned-English Catholic (Episcopalian) home (Mom, though, is of Jewish descent--at least through the Siedenburg-Mueller Pundts. They eventually became Anusi Protestants as well, since they had their daughter Betha Mueller baptized; and Great-Great-Granddad Pundt became Roman Catholic when he married the Irish-American Mary Ellen Green. So, Mom's mom is Jewish; but given that Mom is only 1/32 Jewish--so far as we know--she's of Jewish descent, but not Jewish.

(Mom could be Jewish, however, if--for example--Pop-Pop "McCoy" [Mom's paternal grandma's maternal granddad] was a Sephardic Jew--regardless of that he [assuming that he was Jewish] an Anusi Catholic.).

I'm, therefore, descended on both sides from Catholics--regardless of that they were a mix of Anusi and genuine, Jewish and gentile, Roman and Non-Roman Catholics. Geraldo does not have this claim. Let's also assume, just for hypotheticality's sake, that his granddad Juan Rivera--who was an Ethnic Spaniard--was actually a Sephardic Jew and Anusi Catholic. The claim that Geraldo claims to have on being Catholic would be even less; especially since Anusim really don't count as Catholic (unless, of course, they're truly Catholics who are just hiding their Ethnic Jewishness; but that is another discussion)--and I say the same of my Anusi relatives (including living relatives): unless they truly believed (or believe) Catholicism and were (or are) just hiding their Ethnic Jewishness, they were not (or are not) truly Catholic.

I was also baptized as a Roman Catholic and raised as an English Catholic, and became saved in the graveyard of Christ Episcopalian Church on Easter Day 1996 or 1997 (I still have that memory of Mom and the then-pastor Jen talking in the parking lot while I, in a blue dress and white shirt under the dress, was praying by Miriam Thomann's grave--not to or through Miriam, in case anyone is wondering; but Miriam's legacy did affect me to become saved. Incidentally, her dad--Ron--has long since been deceased, but I'm not sure whether he's buried next to her. Also, I don't know whether Miriam's mom--Alma--is still alive.).

In conclusion, Geraldo Rivera is less Catholic than I am--and I'm not religiously Catholic; though I descended from both Jewish (including Anusi) and gentile Catholics, and was baptized and raised as a Catholic.


geraldo rivera a practicing catholic
1
geraldo rivera i'm a catholic
1

Monday, January 28, 2013

Yeah....No....

There is no proof that we're related to the Romanovs. Russian, yes. Polish, yes. Jewish by ethnicity, and the former two (as well as Hungarian, Ukrainian, and Belarusian, among other types of citizens in Eastern Europe) by citizenship, yes and yes. Romanovs? No...and there's no proof that Stefan Czarniecki (to whom we can't even trace our family tree back) was related to the Romanovs.

czarniecki family romanov family
1
czarniecki family romanov family related
1


PS When you find proof that the Czarnieckis or Czerneckis, Uszinskys, Gajdoszes, etc. were related to the Romanovs, please, let me know. By the way, I did see my mispacha from Switzerland. Shalom alecheim, and I'm sorry that I didn't acknowledge you before. By the way, as a PolishForums guy stated, "Andrius is lithuanian equivalent of russian Andrei which comes from greek. Andriulis in lithuanian means 'little Andrius' or 'dear Andrius'. Andriulis + evičius= Andriulevičius. I checked my LIthuanian surnames dictionary and there are a lot of different surnames with root Andr-, and Andrulevičius(without "i") almost exclusively comes from this little town STAKLISKES. Hope it helps."

So, we're Litvaks. Does this help? Incidentally, I'm very Litvake--more intellectual than emotional. 

   

Sunday, January 20, 2013

My Life Overall

I have a bum right foot, too; and you can guess how shoes fit onto it.

Saturday, January 19, 2013