My Take On the George Zimmerman Case...

So we know and/or can infer from the "Hannity" interview (and other reports) that, among a plethora of other things:

1. Trayvon Martin was indeed on top of and beating up George Zimmerman.
2. George Zimmerman's lie detector and other tests indicated "No Deception Indicated".
3. Witness #9 claimed both racism and molestation.
4. Trayvon Martin, again being on top of George Zimmerman, was reaching for his belt. So, he was either going to beat George with his own belt or even rape him (and criminals, perhaps especially if and when they're drugged--e.g., on pot--will do things like that. Remember the pothead who stripped himself and ate the homeless man's face off?).
5. Trayvon, at 17, was out shopping alone in the first place (and didn't ask his dad or his dad's girlfriend, or someone else with a car to take him); would not even ask George Zimmerman for directions or even take his hood off for a minute to identify himself, and tried to pick a fight with George Zimmerman.
6. George Zimmerman was going to Target when he noticed Trayvon.
7. Trayvon was reasonably profiled among other Black men, and among White and Hispanic men--many of whom had been involved in (as I believe that George Zimmerman himself stated) "a string of burglaries".
8. George Zimmerman once helped, among the kids whom he tutored, a homeless Non-White man.
9. Trayvon Martin was suspended from school and (as I implicity brought up before) a pothead.
10. George Zimmerman didn't mean to follow Trayvon Martin--he was going in the same direction to get to his own house or the neighborhood club to meet the police.

In conclusion, the racist Martin Family and Benjamin Crump, "Reverend" Al Sharpton, the NAACP, and others have a hard, long look to take at the troublemaking 17-year-old that their beloved Trayvon Martin was. 

Broken Blog Shabbat: "Pennsylvania v. Sandusky" (2012)--Composed From My Tweets

That Jerry Sandusky was found guilty by a Penn State-biased jury is amazing. We know that G-d wasn't on Joe Amendola's side. But there is one problem regarding "Pennsylvania v. Sandusky" (2012): the only problem in "Pennsylvania v. Sandusky" is that "Kennedy v. Louisiana" (2008) took the death penalty off of the table.  Thanks to a racist who twisted facts to get his way, Sandusky will still have some time alive. In other words, the Supreme Court must be (albeit belatedly) kicking themselves for a decision that would and does have long-term ramifications--pedophiles such as Jerry Sandusky will never again be legally put to death for essentially (and in some cases, entirely) taking the lives of children--in other words, Jerry Sandusky would be put to death only if he had actually physically murdered one of his victims (though, if I were a prosecutor, investigator, etc.; I'd charge him with murder if one of his victims committed suicide as a result of being sexually abused).

Meanwhile, I thought that Geraldo Rivera would at least tweet about "Pennsylvania v. Sandusky" (2012). Maybe that he didn't is better for everybody. In other words, now is not the time for Geraldo Rivera or anyone else on either side to plug in anything selfish, sensationalistic, etc.. I'm just saying, he has had a reputation for injecting too much self interest and sensationalism into stories. 

The "then again" side  is that he is a lawyer and has an actual and proven reputation of caring for children. So, why hasn't he tweeted? The only reason that I'm saying this is that I remember when he first tweeted about the case saying that he'd beat up Sandusky.

In conclusion, the Supreme Court will hopefully reconsider their "Kennedy" decision in light of "Sandusky"; and Geraldo Rivera--who, if one can say nothing else about him, does have a reputation for caring about children and wanted to beat Jerry Sandusky up for hurting too many children (since even one child is too many children to hurt, and Sandusky hurt at least 10 children over the course of at least 15 years). Anyway, Geraldo Rivera--will hopefully tweet something (hopefully non selfish and non sensationalistic) about the "Sandusky" verdict.

By the way, as I said, one can at least say that Geraldo Rivera does have a reputation for caring about children and would have loved to beat up Jerry Sandusky--too bad that Geraldo Rivera wasn't a prosecutor in the times before and when "Kennedy" took the death penalty off of the table.

A Broken Blog Shabbat: First, It's Rosh HaShanah 5772; Second...

I cannot believe that Bill O'Reilly agreed with Geraldo Rivera. Firstly (and we'll get back to Rosh HaShanah later; but firstly regarding Bill O'Reilly), I needed to get up and walk or eat dinner after that-- I just needed to get up. I thought, "Oh my G-d; Bill O'Reilly is going to get so blasted." I started wondering if Jesse Watters shouldn't have gotten him a cold rag for his head, if that's why Maureen left him, and if he is okay. I could've cried.

As for Rosh HaShanah: anyway, it's Rosh HaShanah; HaChodesh Chadash was cited b'Yerushalayim on the night of March 23; so L'Shanah Tovah Tikatevu v'Shabbat Tov-- despite all the Trayvon Martin-George Zimmerman and other chaos in the world. 

These Blog Shabbats Have Been Useful...

Meanwhile, I could tell that in that moment between David McArthur and Mitt Romney, Mitt Romney was trying not to break down and cry himself. As for the timing of the elections, one could argue that these election cycles are short since past presidents didn't become presidents until later than January 20 (e.g., Lincoln in March). However, election cycles also started later back then. So, I agree with the "Special Report" panel in that unless some miracle for good or bad happens (since a miracle for Santorum would be bad for the rest of us-- e.g., if he won the Super Tuesday states), Mitt Romney's going to be the nominee. So, Super Tuesday should've been the day that the rest of the states (including Maryland) voted-- why drag the election out to April 3rd and all the way into June, even though I have time to get my absentee ballot application in?

Illegal Aliens and Driver's Licenses

Remember this "bustup" that looked like a Jack and Greg Czarnecki fight (My family will get this reference.)? LAPD Police Chief Charlie Beck and Sheriff Lee Baca want to track illegal immigrants using drivers' licenses. How do this bustup and the LAPD plan connect? Alfredo Ramos could've easily been tracked this way in Virginia Beach (where at least two of my cousins and their sides of the family live, and I wonder how they were affected by the Ramos-caused tragedy).

As a Jewish and Latina descendant of illegal-immigrant Anusim, I might be about the only other Republican who agrees with Chief Beck and Sheriff Baca. In other words, yo acuerdo con Geraldo Rivera en eso sujeto respetando a inmigrantes ilegales.

Sean Stone: Schmuck of the Day

Forget Bobby Brown, Geraldo Rivera: Sean Stone is the schmuck l'ha'yom. Sean Stone converted to Mohamedism, met with Iranian officials (including Mahmoud Ahmadinejad), equated "Allah" to Yehovah Eloheinu, and stated that Iran-- because of its supposed republican status-- should have nuclear power. He also brazenly admitted to Bill O'Reilly that he is a Mohamedian who believes that Iran should have nukes and who met with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and others in the Iranian "republic".

By the way, did you think that the "Mob Wives" may be connected to Anti-Israel Ahmadinejad? You never know, Mr. Rivera: after all, the Mafia is ruthless and willing to associate with and do all kinds of evil. 

I'm Just Waiting For The Call On the Caucuses, Likely Santorum's, To Be Made...

And I'm sitting through Ron Paul's speech. That he prefers a good crowd over a good speech seems good and redeeming about Ron Paul; but remember who Ron Paul's crowd is for much or even most of the part: Anti-Semitic or Self-Hating-Jewish (including Anti-Israel), 9-11 "truther", NWO conspiracy theorists. As for playing-with-his-deceased-child Santorum (which Alan Colmes, who loves to seize on stuff like Rick Santorum playing with his deceased child's remains), that Iowa elected him (based on the following from FOX News) raises a lot of questions about Iowa. Not that the straw poll didn't, anyway... Never mind; Romney won. Still, Santorum and Paul being in second and third place raises questions.

• 
  Elections Home
 
• Candidate Tracker
 
•  

2012 Iowa Caucuses

Track the race in real time.

Next Refresh: 16 secs

Refresh Data

	Mitt Romney	Rick Santorum	Ron Paul	Newt Gingrich	Rick Perry	Michele Bachmann	Jon Huntsman	Herman Cain
Votes	27,101	26,976	23,155	14,576	11,279	5,576	645	54
%	25%	25%	22%	14%	11%	6%	<1%	<1%

Percentage Reporting

89%

Entrance Poll by Gender

• 57%
• 43%

• Male
• Female

See All Entrance Polls ›

All Counties

See All ›

	Candidate	Votes	%
	Romney	27,101	25%
	Santorum	26,976	25%
	Paul	23,155	22%
	Gingrich	14,576	14%
	Perry	11,279	11%
	Bachmann	5,576	6%
	Huntsman	645	<1%
	Cain