The Nicole Factor

"Is Kirk Douglas a Messianic Jew?" Real Question and the Answer Thereto

2012-01-28T14:05:00.002-05:00

Far from it. Kirk Douglas is a Conservative Jew, and the USCJ is very Antimissionary.

Search Keywords

is kirk douglas a messianic jew?

ben plonie jewish journal

krystal covel wedding

I Knew That Geraldo Might Want To Be a Jason Chaffetz But For Erica....

2012-01-28T13:48:00.000-05:00

Skip to 25:55. I asked if Geraldo would ever convert to Mormonism. If Geraldo wants to convert, shouldn't he be able to? Besides, Mormonism and Reform Judaism are essentially in the same boat. I've blogged about Erica's influence several times; and I tell you that Erica's influence on Geraldo is beyond pathetic and sad at best.

What Erica hates is the Jesus aspect of Mormonism; although if she and so many other Antimissionaries-- and others-- did their homework, they'd see that the Mormon Jesus is not the same as the Messianic Jewish (Christian, including Evangelical Mormon) Jesus. Besides, since Non-Evangelical Mormons believe that Jesus and Satan are brothers; and since Antimissionaries essentially believe that, what would be Erica's problem? After all, Non-Evangelical Mormons and Antimissionaries (such as the URJ and CCAR, by whom Erica is clearly influenced) hate Jesus enough to think him the brother of Satan and certainly not G-d the Son.

By the way, I hope that Erica is reading this. She needs to back off and let her husband be her husband instead of her robot; and as I said, she needs to do her homework.

Wednesday's Blog Entry, In Case You Missed It...

2012-01-27T21:57:00.002-05:00

If There's a View From Baltimore, That Was Probably Me...

2012-01-27T00:14:00.002-05:00

But I couldn't blog from the UMBC computers, and won't be moving in my laptop until Sunday night. Maybe the UMBC internet network has blocked anyone from posting blogs altogether. Meanwhile, I'll at least try to blog if and when I can. Also meanwhile, the verses that are keeping me particularly afloat this semester are Proverbs 3:5-6 and 16:33.

On another note, I'm scheduled to take my final stats exam at Howard Community College in the morning. Just pray for me, and l'laila tov. Especially prayers for me regarding anything have helped to keep me afloat as well as has Scripture-- I still try to read the various parshot v'haftarot yom l'yom.

Pseudo-Christian Liberals and Tax Deductions

2012-01-24T20:09:00.000-05:00

To say the least, I figured that-- well, here we go again. Pseudo-Christian Liberals always try to do this kind of stuff. Here's what a George Soros-loving, Far-Left, Pseudo Christian proposed; and the rest of the conversation but his and my part in it will be censored. So for both our sakes will be his name (I'm not willing to get sued by a man who thinks that Potter in "It's a Wonderful Life" was a Republican and who endorsed that awful University of Indiana, Bloomington study against Bill O'Reilly.).

Read this like a phone call, because I'm just using what this man said to sum up what he believes-- and believes to the detriment of not only churches and schools like those of Chapelgate, but batei knesiyot and shuls, mosques and madrassas, and other organizations as well. By the way, I posted only a part of the conversation; the part where I refused to get goaded into an argument with this guy.

So this George Soros-loving, Far-Left, Pseudo Christian proposed the following:

[Paraphrase of what he told a mutual friend] The charity tax deduction should be abolished.
...

did I? I thought I proposed including religious organizations in said category.

I propose excluding religious organizations from the category of an acceptable tax deduction. I believe that it infringes on the separation of church and state. I believe it attaches strings to religious organizations. Furthermore, I believe that it is grotesquely abused. I also believe I am going to get killed on this one.

It also frustrates me that many religious persons will defend Mitt Romney's right to use his church as a tax dodge and overlook his exceptionally immoral accumulation of wealth. He should be giving 90% of that away.

AS I said earlier, I believe it is showing favoritism to persons of religious belief. While I recognize the right of a holy God to show such favoritism, I categorically deny the right of a secular state, particularly under the guise of our particular system, to do so.

in the moral sense.

I think that charitable tax deductions should be acceptable when they are for some sense of the greater good, virtue in its historic sense.

...

if you are going to use WSJ, can I use HuffPo?

Isn't he simply identifying a return to a pre-Jeffersonian situation?

Indeed. I think they should get. WE are in a massive deficit. Either we cut spending (and yes Reagan fans, foreign policy is big government and expensive), or raise taxes.

not surprising. Why do you think these people support policies that would seem to so threaten their wealth?

And that, I believe, is where Jesus comes into play. If America's evangelicals would start loving people like he commands us to, we wouldn't have many of the problems that government poorly tries to deal with. But of course they do a bad job. What do we expect from something as massive and complex as the Untied States?

agreed on Buffett.

...

the film in question was by Jamie Johnson, heir to the Johnson and Johnson fortune, and it was about the unethical nature of wealth perpetuation in the United States. He disowned her for being interviewed in it.
...

[Me] I don't see why legitimate good should be taxed. As pointed out, the tax deduction is there to protect the religious organizations from the government and vice versa-- which is based on a 1954 law endorsed heavily by then legislator Lyndon Baines Johnson.

indeed it is worth seeing! I would love to hear your thoughts on it.

[Me] I've said what I'm going to say.

I Have To Be Realistic And Prepare Myself For That...

2012-01-24T00:48:00.003-05:00

This birthday emotional high is not going to last. The emotional high wasn't fully a high, either. I definitely had OCD/Anxiety flare ups during the night, for example. Also, the people who wished me "Happy Birthday", etc. today-- I have to be realistic, and I either have to hope that they're silent support throughout the rest of the year or accept that many of them are being what they think is on-the-surface polite and even interacting with me (just because they feel obliged to-- in other words, just because they're family, etc.).

I have to also remember that this world is full of other suffering, pain, etc. besides what I will most likely suffer in even the coming day. There are children such as Joshua and Jackson (who are rallied for on Facebook) who are suffering from childhood cancer, pneumonia, and other conditions and diseases. There's the Jewish community back home b'Ha'Eretz under threat every day from Egypt, Iran, even Russia and increasingly-Anti-Semitic Western and Central (along with some number of Eastern) Europe.

I could go on, but you get the point: as my birthday closes out, that there are some hard days ahead for me and others unless the Rapture comes within the next second or minute, or hour or so.

Response to Charles P.'s Wonderful Question

2012-01-23T22:19:00.003-05:00

"I often wonder about the souls of the unborn, and yet-to-be conceived, in the rapture.

"How do souls work? Is there a finite number of souls? How many souls will there be, from start to finish?

"If the rapture comes today, what of all the souls the souls that could have been here, had the rapture came tomorrow instead?

"What about pregnant women, how will their unborn children be judged; what if the mother had not accepted Christ, will the child suffer for the mistake of the parent?

"I hope the rapture comes in my lifetime, just so I can get some answers! :P"

To begin, the yet-to-be conceived won't be conceived until after the Tribulation. There are references to children in the Millennial Kingdom in Tanakh. I sadly don't have these references off hand or memorized, however. When I find them again sometime (if the Rapture doesn't come before I can find them again), I'll (G-d willing) post them in another entry.

As for unborn children, they-- since they haven't reached the age of accountability-- will, sadly for the mothers who are unsaved, be taken straight out of the womb and raptured in Heaven while the unsaved mothers are left behind and (in regards to their unborn children) childless. As far as Tanakh indicates, the soul isn't even created until during or after conception; so as I said, any yet-to-be-created souls will be created after the Tribulation whereas already-created souls will be (with the bodies that hold them) be raptured.

I hope that this answers your question, Charles.

What I Want For My 22nd Birthday, Including If I Can't Those DNA Tests From (And For) the Family

2012-01-22T21:58:00.001-05:00

I want the Rapture to come. Can you imagine a tearless, painless, sufferless, burdenless world? There's a gift for the world-- or at least the Church in the world. But because of the Rapture, many of the world will come to see what they could've had if they had been only in the world; and salvation in any form at that point will be a gift-- whether they'll have to face being left behind, losing a loved one and having to know that he or she went to be with Jesus (Yeshua), or even being murdered by the Antichrist (Ha'Ish Asher Lo L'Mashiach) and calling out HaShem-Mashiach in his or her last moments.

An Example of Why Some Young and Other People Need To Understand the News and Law More

2012-01-22T17:54:00.002-05:00

Nicole Czarnecki

‎: Laila tov. I know that noone wants to hear that if the child-molester enabler weren't Joe Pa, we'd care. But I'm not politically conformist. Besides, I feel ashamed that we're in a country where we give child-molester enablers a pass if and just because they're famous. If Joe Pa was Joe Schmo, who would give him a pass?

· · · Share · 16 hours ago

Dennis Czajka, Audra Hairston and Arnold Denney like this.
- Andrew Wild Geddie · 14 mutual friends
  joe paterno is one of the greatest football coaches ever n an even better person. he made penn state great n dedicated his life to greatness. joepa was wrongd in the sandusky situation because he fulfilld his legal obligation. if u believe that joepas guilty then u must believe that coach mcquery deserves jail time because he actually saw it and did nothing
  15 hours ago · · 2
- Carson Henry Get your facts straight Nicole...
  22 minutes ago · · 1
- Nicole Czarnecki
  That actually applies to you, Carson. I paid attention to the news. Here's what happened: Sandusky was Paterno's assistant. In 1998, Sandusky started being investigated. In the 2000s (I believe 2002), McQueary saw a young man being raped in...See More
  
  18 minutes ago ·
- Andrew Wild Geddie · 14 mutual friends
  The school droppd the ball... Even ur "facts" say so. I read the indictment
  16 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki All of them dropped the ball. What don't you get?
  16 minutes ago ·
- Carson Henry How is it Joe
  15 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki Besies, JoePa had more status-- thus more of a responsibility-- than them. With status and fame come responsibility.
  15 minutes ago ·
- Andrew Wild Geddie · 14 mutual friends
  Joe followd protocol... If he didn't he wuld have a reason to get fired.
  13 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki If JoePa were Joe Schmo, you two honestly would not be defending him. You would have said that he should've fired his assistant and reported him to the police in addition to the school.
  13 minutes ago ·
- Carson Henry For all Joe knows Sandusky could be Making it up, Joe saw nothing therefore he had no reason to contact authorities...who calls 911 and says hey someone just told me that they saw a rape? really? would you call?? It is beyond me that anyone ever expected him to tell anyone
  13 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki Either way, you call if a serious allegation arises. And yes, I would call. Child rape is very serious. By law, you have to call.
  12 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki Also, I'd rather be fired for righteousness than in disgrace.
  11 minutes ago ·
- Carson Henry By law if you SEE it...again check your facts...YOU have been raped by the media
  11 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki Carson, you use the term lightly.
  11 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki And JoePa heard of it, and McQueary saw it. As I said, both should've been in trouble along with Sandusky.
  11 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki I pray that you men never ever end up or know someone that ends up like one of McQueary's, JoePa's, Sandusky's, and the rest of Penn State's victims.
  10 minutes ago ·
- Andrew Wild Geddie · 14 mutual friends
  If he told police n it turnd out that none of it happnd he wuld b fired n sandusky culd sue joe for defamation
  10 minutes ago · · 1
- Nicole Czarnecki So? If Joe Paterno told in good faith, he could get off. There is that good-faith clause.
  9 minutes ago ·
- Carson Henry I pray that you arent ever able to vote because the News has control of your brain
  8 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki That should apply to you, Carson. Besides, I can tell that you're one of those starstruck and Ron Paul nuts already. If you actually read or watched any news once in a while, maybe you could wise up a little.
  7 minutes ago ·
- Andrew Wild Geddie · 14 mutual friends
  There is no good faith wen it comes to serious sht like that. U can't accuse somebody of rape n not b 100% sure.
  5 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki There is legally a good-faith clause. If he reported it in good faith, he'd absolutely not be liable.
  4 minutes ago ·
- Carson Henry Okay...1st of all Im not starstruck by ANY candidate...2nd I watch the news I just have the presence of mind to know and differentiate between fact and fiction...which obviously you do not
  3 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki Carson, what do you watch?
  3 minutes ago ·
- Carson Henry and he STILL is not liable because he had NOTHING TO DO WITH THE SITUATION
  3 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki I'm asking you a question. What do you watch?
  2 minutes ago ·
- Carson Henry Spongebob, Hey Arnold, and the occasional Hannah Montana
  2 minutes ago ·
- Nicole Czarnecki There you go. You don't even watch the news. You're just going off of what JoePa fans are saying.
  about a minute ago ·
- Andrew Wild Geddie · 14 mutual friends
  The lesson of all this: Don't watch fox news! Haha carson hit my phone up
  about a minute ago · · 1
  
  Andrew Wild Geddie · 14 mutual friends
  I go off wat the indictment said n wat the lawyers n legal analysts n all the other ppl involved r sayn on ESPN
  a few seconds ago ·
  
  Nicole Czarnecki ESPN-- not news!

Joe Paterno Was Punished Enough By Having To Suffer Death...

2012-01-22T16:59:00.001-05:00

Westboro Baptist Church does not need to add to what Joe Paterno suffered for his crimes of accomplice. Joe Paterno suffered enough on this Earth, and only G-d knows what Joe Paterno is suffering on the other side. Westboro, like everyone else, should accept that Joe Paterno had and has been no more and no less punished than he needed and needs to be.

What I Want For My 22nd Birthday: DNA Tests From Male Relatives To Check For Kohein, Etc. Markers

2012-01-22T01:39:00.000-05:00

I'm pushing the envelope & asking as male members as possible for DNA tests on my birthday. I want to know

at least whether I'm a kohenet (female descendant of Aharon ben-'Amram v'Yokheved, v'HaKohein). Any

male descendants, please get your DNA checked for Jewish-- especially kohein-- markers for our common

lineages if you can.

On a side note, Kevin-- even though we don't share the Levshiks in common as far as we know--, you won't

be able to find the Levshik connection in the mtDNA; since Jewish women don't have Jewish DNA

(Remember that DNA of any ethnic sort gets passed down only in the Y-DNA). Thank G-d, we were able to

use that your Levit relative used the common device (the Levi surname variant) to establish that she was a bat-

Levi.

Who's Worse: The Sinner or the Enabler Thereof (And Also A Sinner)?

2012-01-21T23:32:00.002-05:00

Having gone through abuse (though never sexual abuse), I have to wonder who's worse between the to-be-late (and justly punished) JoePa or the short-term escaper Jerry Sandusky (who got off in this life only because of "Coker" (1977), "Kennedy" (2008), and JoePa and other child-molester enablers). JoePa is the enabler of the short-term escaper Jerry Sandusky, and Jerry Sandusky is clearly the sinner who is (or rather, was) enabled. Compared to my dad's and grandparents' enablers regarding me, JoePa is the sexual-abuse equivalent regarding the Jerry Sandusky victims.

Meanwhile, a Biblical equivalent of my dad's enablers (including my dad's mother in law) and of Joe Paterno includes the Corinthian community of Messianic Jews who allowed a young Jewish Corinthian to sleep with his stepmother:

¹ It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and such sexual immorality as is not even named^[a] among the Gentiles—that a man has his father’s wife! ² And you are puffed up, and have not rather mourned, that he who has done this deed might be taken away from among you. ³ For I indeed, as absent in body but present in spirit, have already judged (as though I were present) him who has so done this deed. ⁴ In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, when you are gathered together, along with my spirit, with the power of our Lord Jesus Christ, ⁵ deliver such a one to Satan for the destruction of the flesh, that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord Jesus.^[b]
⁶ Your glorying is not good. Do you not know that a little leaven leavens the whole lump? ⁷ Therefore purge out the old leaven, that you may be a new lump, since you truly are unleavened. For indeed Christ, our Passover, was sacrificed for us.^[c] ⁸ Therefore let us keep the feast, not with old leaven, nor with the leaven of malice and wickedness, but with the unleavened bread of sincerity and truth.

Was Paul allowed to let the enablers get away with what they were doing? Absolutely not:

⁹ I wrote to you in my epistle not to keep company with sexually immoral people. ¹⁰ Yet I certainly didnot mean with the sexually immoral people of this world, or with the covetous, or extortioners, or idolaters, since then you would need to go out of the world. ¹¹ But now I have written to you not to keep company with anyone named a brother, who is sexually immoral, or covetous, or an idolater, or a reviler, or a drunkard, or an extortioner—not even to eat with such a person.
¹² For what have I to do with judging those also who are outside? Do you not judge those who are inside? ¹³ But those who are outside God judges. Therefore “put away from yourselves the evil person.”^[d]

Were Paterno correctly handled in the American legal system, he would've been just as my dad's enablers legally should be and the Jewish Corinthians Biblically were: accomplices. Paterno can be thankful that he escaped justice in the short term, however, because he wasn't prosecuted legally. Being prosecuted Biblically is enough for him.

As I said, meanwhile, I have to wonder who is worse: the sexually and otherwise immoral, such as Jerry Sandusky; or the "puffed up" such as Joe Paterno. To sin is one thing; to knowingly enable and even encourage sin is another.

Only For the Sake of Sandusky's and JoePa's Victims Do I Think That...

2012-01-21T22:06:00.000-05:00

Joe Paterno is getting what he deserves. "Coker" (1977) and "Kennedy" (2008) allowed Jerry Sandusky and Joe Paterno not to die in the electric chair or by lethal injection when the Penn State Scandal eve started going on. At least Joe Paterno is dying surrounded by family and friends, with one last chance to confess and repent as well as inform on whatever he needs to inform on regarding Sandusky-- including what he's still held back.

As for Jerry Sandusky's and Joe Paterno's then-child, now-adult victims; they don't get any chance at anything-- their lives are indefinitely ruined. In fact, you would know that at least two of Sandusky's and JoePa's victims faced backlash and otherwise the opposite of support if you paid attention to the news. As Joe Paterno gets his Lat Rites, by the way, may he learn what these very words mean:

“Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, that he will also reap. For he who sows to his flesh will of the flesh reap corruption, but he who sows to the Spirit will of the Spirit reap everlasting life.” Galatians 6:7-8 NKJV

JoePa and Jerry Sandusky reaped death and destruction for those then-child, now-adult victims (among whom is one young adult who was one of the two aforementioned victims of backlash). JoePa is now facing death, and who knows with Jerry Sandusky?

Not That I'm Self Exalting, But...

2012-01-20T17:58:00.002-05:00

I'm just as "what you see is what you get" as Geraldo Rivera. I don't hide ish (pun highly intended. If you don't understand what "ish" is in Hebrew and is in English, Google it.). I criticize even my own family and the most central member in the family (next to G-d) to me-- me. I know me as well as I know me, and know me better than I know anyone else. But even G-d knows me better than I know me.

By the way, you have a problem if you're not the most central member of your family (next to G-d) to you. Who are you if you don't know who you are and why you are who you are? For example, I thought that I was a Dark Irish, German-French, Polish-Lithuanian-Czechoslovakian American before I knew that I'm an Anusit-- or was an Anusit. Now because I'm not a Crypto Jew and I even know that I'm a Jew in the first place, I can confidently be a Patrilineally-Jewish Messianic Jew with Ashkenazic Jewish- (hold your breath) Polish-Russian, Polish-Ukrainian-Russian, perhaps Lithuanian-Belorussian, Slovakian-Hungarian, Slovakian-Austrian-Hungarian, and Slovakian-Russian blood (I warned you to hold your breath. I just gave you a long list of the Ashkenazic Jewish blood that I have.).

As for the gentile blood (I think, though some could very well be Jewish blood); it's a long list, too. Want the list? E-mail me or comment on this blog. The list is as extensive and contains just as much information that you might need. By the way, where are relatives e-mailing me? Also by the way, ain't that fun that I'm probably related to Kirk Douglas (nee Issur Danielovich)? (I was being sarcastic about the "fun" part. Having Jack Czarnecki, Mary Gaydos, and Mia Danilowicz-- among others-- as relatives is enough.)

Non-Evangelical Catholicism Even Inadvertently Admits That It's Not Christianity

2012-01-19T21:53:00.000-05:00

Google "Catholicism and fundamentalism". For example, the Catholics admit that they don't believe in the inerrancy and infallibility of the Bible, and that do so is "fundamentalist" in a derogatory sense according to Catholicism. The Catholics even criticize Evangelical Catholics:

"Fundamentalism is a relatively new brand of Protestantism started in America that has attracted a tremendous following, including many fallen away Catholics. How did this popular movement originate? The history of Fundamentalism may be viewed as having three main phases. The first lasted a generation, from the 1890s to the Scopes "Monkey Trial" of 1925. In this period, Fundamentalism emerged as a reaction to liberalizing trends in American Protestantism; it broke off, but never completely, from Evangelicalism, of which it may be considered one wing. In its second phase, it passed from public view, but never actually disappeared or even lost ground. Finally, Fundamentalism came to the nation’s attention again around 1970, and it has enjoyed considerable growth.

"What has been particularly surprising is that Catholics seem to constitute a disproportionate share of the new recruits. The Catholic Church in America includes about a quarter of the country’s inhabitants, so one might expect about a quarter of new Fundamentalists to have been Catholics at one time. But in many Fundamentalist congregations, anywhere from one-third to one-half of the members once belonged to the Catholic Church. This varies around the country, depending on how large the native Catholic population is."

Many of these Evangelical Catholics are Protestants who are Evangelical (Christian) and still Catholic at heart, just Evangelical Catholics and Protestants who would be still Catholic if the Catholic Church were Evangelical. Evangelical Catholics do not like the following criticized by the Catholic Church:

The fundamental doctrines identified in the series can be reduced to five: (I) the inspiration and what the writers call infallibility of Scripture, (2) the deity of Christ (including his virgin birth), (3) the substitutionary atonement of his death, (4) his literal resurrection from the dead, and (5) his literal return at the Second Coming.

Catholics particularly hate the following:

"Although the doctrine of the inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible is most commonly cited as the essential cornerstone of the Fundamentalist beliefs, the logically prior doctrine is the deity of Christ. For the Catholic, his deity is accepted either on the word of the authoritative and infallible Church or because a dispassionate examination of the Bible and early Christian history shows that he must have been just what he claimed to be—God.

"Most Catholics, as a practical matter, accept his divinity based upon the former method; many—the apologist Arnold Lunn is a good example—use the latter. In either case, there is a certain reasoning involved in the Catholic’s embrace of this teaching. For many Fundamentalists, the assurance of Christ’s divinity comes not through reason, or even through faith in the Catholic meaning of the word, but through an inner, personal experience."

In other words, Catholics have to lie about what Protestants and Evangelical Catholics believe. Protestants and Evangelical Catholics believe in grace through faith alone, and vice versa, based on what the Bible says. Protestants and Evangelical Catholics do not believe in a New Age "inner, personal experience". And the experience is not personal-- for "there are three that bear witness on earth: the Spirit, the water, and the blood; and these three agree as one."

There is nothing personal in salvation-- one must answer to and be saved by the Spirit. Salvation is not a choice, but an election and calling which all the members of Eloheinu Echad choose to confer on someone-- and thus the saved have no individual choice and are held accountable in regards to salvation:

¹⁴ What shall we say then? Is there unrighteousness with God? Certainly not! ¹⁵ For He says to Moses,“I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whomever I will have compassion.”^[f] ¹⁶ So then it is not of him who wills, nor of him who runs, but of God who shows mercy. ¹⁷ For the Scripture says to the Pharaoh, “For this very purpose I have raised you up, that I may show My power in you, and that My name may be declared in all the earth.”^[g] ¹⁸ Therefore He has mercy on whom He wills, and whom He wills He hardens.
¹⁹ You will say to me then, “Why does He still find fault? For who has resisted His will?” ²⁰ But indeed, O man, who are you to reply against God? Will the thing formed say to him who formed it, “Why have you made me like this?” ²¹ Does not the potter have power over the clay, from the same lump to make one vessel for honor and another for dishonor?
²² What if God, wanting to show His wrath and to make His power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath prepared for destruction, ²³ and that He might make known the riches of His glory on the vessels of mercy, which He had prepared beforehand for glory, ²⁴ even us whom He called, not of the Jews only, but also of the Gentiles?

The blood, by the way, is the witness of and for particularly Jesus; and the water of baptism, and of particularly the Father and the Spirit-- maybe just particularly the Father, though (which is a long discussion).

So the Orientation Went Well, But...

2012-01-19T21:05:00.002-05:00

That doesn't mean that there weren't some incidents. I could kvetch about how the orientation went, but a few key incidents and notes:

The prayers worked, and thanks for the prayers.
I'm skipping "The O'Reilly Factor" at 8:00 to watch the rerun at 11:00 because I still have other things to do at home-- for example, listen to the daily WABC "Geraldo" broadcast (or in my case, podcast).
Michelle and I each got a free cup of coffee. Long story short, we were each charged for a full meal at True Grit's. When I saw the $21.00 total charge, I honestly thought that the receipt was someone else's receipt. So, Michelle took it back to the counter, got the policy explained to her, and had them give her the coffee free (which they did on their own initiative because they understood that we didn't know the policy).
One blog entry that I wrote is in handwriting, and I'll scan it in later.

By the way, that was beyond dirty of Erica to use Sol to get her point that Geraldo's mustache is "so old fashioned" and that Sol's friends think that Geraldo "[is her] grandfather". Skip to 25:27, and you'l hear why that was clearly a spouse using her child to get her own point across to her spouse-- and I hate when any spouse (not just Erica to Geraldo by using Sol) does that to his or her spouse and his or her child.

One Can't Blog About Everything; And I Try To Blog Every Day, So...

2012-01-18T21:52:00.001-05:00

I'll try my best just to get a few sentences in. First, I agree with Geraldo Rivera that Paula Deen was entirely disingenuous. Second, the case of the Costa Concordia proves why Europe (including Italy) needs to bring back the death penalty. Third, I'm against SOPA and PIPA, and for the Fair Use Doctrine. Fourth (and in conclusion), I'm really busy because I have an orientation at UMBC tomorrow; and I'll be at UMBC virtually all day, and I'm stressed out about the orientation-- including the idea of having to be there all day, since I can't drive.

Anyway, there's my at-least-once-daily blogging entry. Just pray for me and for the orientation (and preferably the Rapture, especially in this meshuga 'olam), v'l'laila tov.

Why I've Suffered So Much: At Least Partly Because of That Kapo Mary Rusnak Gaydos

2012-01-17T23:33:00.003-05:00

I don't exactly remember who Jack Feldman is descended from, by the way; but I begin to suspect more and more that his Chron's-- besides his trief eating-- comes from his Fosko-Rusnak matriarch being a kapo as well. My side (the Fosko-Rusnak-Gaydos side) has been visited for certain:

Numbers 14:18
‘The LORD is longsuffering and abundant in mercy, forgiving iniquity and transgression; but He by no means clears the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generation.’

I mean, I don't think that we can any more into entering the abyss zone than having four of the five Rusnak-Gaydos children (Grandaunt Mary Ann and Grandma included) being absolutely wicked (The only one who would not be wicked by doing or enabling any wickedness was Grandaunt Helen, who I didn't know was habat tzedekah until after she was gone.), having even some of habnei v'banot shel habat tzedekah take after the bnei-v'banot ra'im (Ashley and Matt, I'll name you as two of them. Shame on you for not acknowledging our Yiddishkeit and Eloheinu v'Elohim Avinu.), and having some of us bnei v'banot suffer abuse which we have not (or at least tried not to have) perpetuated the cycle of.

While I'm on the subject of Matt, by the way, why does he have Spina Bifida? And why do I have Cerebral Palsy? And why does Jack have Chron's (if his Fosko-Rusnak matriarch was indeed also a wicked kapo)?

Deuteronomy 7:13
And He will love you and bless you and multiply you; He will also bless the fruit of your womb and the fruit of your land, your grain and your new wine and your oil, the increase of yourcattle and the offspring of your flock, in the land of which He swore to your fathers to give you.

Let me give you a hint: Great-Grandma Gaydos and her zerim sure haven't been blessed:

Leviticus 21:17-24

New King James Version (NKJV)

¹⁷ “Speak to Aaron, saying: ‘No man of your descendants in succeeding generations, who has anydefect, may approach to offer the bread of his God. ¹⁸ For any man who has a defect shall not approach: a man blind or lame, who has a marred face or any limb too long, ¹⁹ a man who has a broken foot or broken hand, ²⁰ or is a hunchback or a dwarf, or a man who has a defect in his eye, or eczema or scab, or is a eunuch. ²¹ No man of the descendants of Aaron the priest, who has a defect, shall come near to offer the offerings made by fire to the LORD. He has a defect; he shall not come near to offer the bread of his God. ²² He may eat the bread of his God, both the most holy and the holy; ²³ only he shall not go near the veil or approach the altar, because he has a defect, lest he profane My sanctuaries; for I the LORD sanctify them.’”
²⁴ And Moses told it to Aaron and his sons, and to all the children of Israel.

Hint two:

While we may not be koheinim, let me ask you this: if being one "who has a defect" (including one that results in the said one being "blind or lame, who has a marred face or any limb too long, a man who has a broken foot or broken hand, or is a hunchback or a dwarf") is even a (for a lack of a better term) just-because curse to zerim shel Aharon; how likely would you think that any one of those defects could be inflicted even on non koheinim who are or whose predecessors were kapos?

Numbers 14:18
‘The LORD is longsuffering and abundant in mercy, forgiving iniquity and transgression; but He by no means clears the guilty, visiting the iniquity of the fathers on the children to the third and fourth generation.’

As I said, by the way, being crippled and being sickened (with me, Matt, and Jack-- if his Fosko-Rusnak matriarch was indeed also a wicked kapo-- included) aren't the only curses which the zerim of the kapo Fosko Rusnaks-- especially those of Mary Rusnak Gaydos-- have had to endure.

So Far, What Seemed Like a Miracle Is a Shattered Dream....

2012-01-17T19:33:00.000-05:00

I'm not going to get into what the miracle is, especially if it turns out to be a shattered dream; since (even though I'm a Jewish Christian) I don't want to (for a lack of a better term) jinx any chances of my so-far-shattered dream being what I had thought (or hoped) that it was going to be. To make a long story short; I don't presently have all that I need to fulfill the dream, and I could possibly be being presented with a possibly-false-choice scenario wherein fulfilling my dream and going to college for at least this semester is regarded.

I'm not asking for money. I'm asking for prayer, prayer that (as the Bible says) G-d will provide; though I am much less than many who have been provided for and are being (and/or will be) provided for. I'm not Avraham or Moshe, or so many others who have been provided for. I'm not the starving child in Africa or the sexual-abuse victim (who, in many cases, is-- in a sense-- luckier than I am because he or she suffers so much more here, and gets more sympathy from both Heaven and Earth-- and more reward in Heaven because of his or her suffering. As I've blogged about before, I can't even get sympathy or empathy for what little I've been through in comparison-- in fact, I usually get the opposite. That is, I get the opposite of sympathy and empathy.).

As I said, I'm asking for just prayer, prayer that (as the Bible says) G-d will provide; though I am much less than everyone from Avraham and Moshe, to the starving child in Africa and the sexual-abuse victim. Besides, the fulfillment of my dream may help that I am exalted above those who have abused and hated me, and who even abuse (including ignore) and hate me still.

So I Read A Friend From A Letter, And...

2012-01-17T00:32:00.000-05:00

Just pray for me and pray for the friend. To make a long story short, because of my OCD/Anxiety/Depression/unmedicated-mild ADD, possible Aspbeger's, Diplegic Spastia Cerebral Palsy, and "friends" and family either abandoning or even outright abusing me at various points in my life; I realistically have ups and downs, trust issues, etc.. I'm not going to trust everybody (Don't ask; I've already learned not to trust everybody, long story short. There's wisdom in wariness.) and I'm not going to stop speaking the truth (or at least trying to speak the truth) on my family and other people, and religion and other matters.

But from now on, if you abandon or even abuse me, I won't get too mad about it; I'll just let whatever you do against me be your own damned problem. I'll let that I'm so used to being abandoned and abused help me to not even be phased or surprised anymore by any abandonment and abuse that I receive. And as I've told some people; when you need me, I might not be there for you because I might not be able to be-- and then what are you going to do?

I See That Some People Read My Open Letter And...

2012-01-16T18:44:00.002-05:00

Removed me on Facebook, Twitter, etc. Good! I don't need you, anyway. As I wrote:

I define Facebook as "Face"book-- meaning that I'm not hiding my face or anything else from you. If I have something not to hide, I don't hide it. I didn't ask you to agree with me on everything, but as I've said, I can back up what I say. If you want to agree to disagree and even not debate, you can choose to keep any reservations to yourself.

I also stated, "I will always back up what I say." That you can't back up your disagreements with me is a shame. You're the kind (at least some of you are the kind) who "have affected me to state, 'At points, if I weren't a Christian, I wouldn't be a Christian.'" You don't know how to agree to disagree and still maintain love and friendships-- and you even have the hutzpah to go behind my back to my mom and my sister. What a shame!

The Free Book Finally Came-- This Is Not An Advertisement

2012-01-15T16:54:00.002-05:00

I finally got the free book to give away. As I said, "The book is not intended to be returned; so as I said, give

the book to a loved one or loved one's loved one, or an acquaintance or whoever else is Jewish and is curious

about Yeshua if you don't intended to keep it. The book is not meant for gentiles-- they can go to church, or to

the public library, or to more gentile-demographic places to find books about Yeshua for gentiles."

Chosen People Ministries really does prefer that the book is read by Jewish people; though they do state, "We

are expecting, by God's grace, to send out thousands [of copies of Isaiah 53 Explained] to Jews and non-Jews

who need to know the Lord." Just send me your address, and I'll get the book to you or have Chosen People

Ministries send you a copy.

E. Michael Jones Has Ulterior Motives and No Authority To Speak on Modern Judaism or Catholicism

2012-01-14T21:50:00.001-05:00

Besides, E. Michael Jones Wikipedia all the fodder that they needed. Firstly, E. Michael Jones is an Anti Semite ad has no authority to speak on Modern Judaism, covering his Anti Semitism with the following:

"Jones has stated publicly that he considers modern Judaism to be a wicked ideology, but that he condemns criticism of Jews based upon race.^[3] In February, 2008, due to a complaint of anti-Semitism from the Southern Poverty Law Center, the School of Architecture at The Catholic University of America cancelled a lecture series in which Jones was scheduled to speak. In an interview with The Washington Times Jones said that he rejected racism in all of its forms, consistent with Catholic teaching^[2] and responded to the cancellation in an article in Culture Wars.^[4]"

While Modern Non-Messianic Judaism is-- unintentionally and intentionally-- indeed wicked, E. Michael Jones

is not a Jew and thus his little to no authority to speak on the issue of Judaism. Whatever authority he did have,

he dashed along with his credibility by coming from a Non-Evangelical Catholic angle. As I have blogged,

Non-Evangelical Catholicism (Roman, Byzantine, and otherwise) is Pseudo-Christian, Anti-Semitic

wickedness.

Myself being born into an Anusi (Roman and Byzantine Catholic) and Roman Catholic family, baptized

Anusit and Roman Catholic (since my dad was English Catholic-- Episcopalian-- and is still not open about

his Jewish heritage; and my mom had my sister and me baptized by a Roman Catholic priest who was a

friend of her late Evangelical Catholic, getting-ready-to-leave-Catholicism-when-he-died dad), and raised

Anusit and Episcopalian (and not knowing that I'm Jewish until I was 18); I have more authority to speak on

the issue of both than does E. Michael Jones. As far as I know, Ex-Professor Jones has never pointed to

'Amos 5:21-27 to prove how Modern Non-Messianic Jews both inadvertently and deliberately worship

Sikkut v'Kiyun.

In fact, given how little Catholic are encouraged to read the Bible, especially the first three books of Tanakh
(and the fourth, Hadashah, being so muddied up by Non-Evangelical Catholicism over the years to do

awful works against Yeshua and Paul's own people); E. Michael Jones probably couldn't tell you where

'Amos is located in Tanakh-- whether in the traditional Jewish (including Messianic Jewish) or the traditional

Christian order.

Also, if E. Michael Jones really knew Catholicism for what Catholicism is, he wouldn't have had the

following views on it:

"Jones then obtained his Ph.D. from Temple University and began to teach at Saint Mary's College, of Notre Dame, Indiana. To Jones' displeasure, he found this college to be what he considered to be (in the words of Michael W. Cuneo who interviewed him) "the antithesis of what a Catholic college should be", being pro-choice, feminist and secular. He made little effort to conceal his views, leading to conflicts with many faculty, his department chairwoman and eventually the college's president. His department, which viewed him as a religious absolutist, decided against renewing his contract after his first year.^{[1]"

Jones needs to wake up and smell Catholicism for what it is. He obviously didn't learn from St. Mary's or

Catholic University of America. Perhaps he'd like to go to then-College, now-University of Notre Dame

Maryland and look over the whole history of Catholicism and how Evangelical Catholicism (and Evangelical

Catholics such as Jan Hus, John Wycliffe, Teresa De Avila, Edith Stein, and Abraham Sh'mu'eloff) were all

treated (the first two victims of being murdered for "heresy", the third having her Jewishness and the fact that

her family was victim to the Catholic-started Inquisition almost even ignored by the Catholic Church, Edith

Stein being murdered by self-proclaimed "Christian" Catholic and Lutheran Nazis-- and the Catholic Church

doing nothing to save Edith Stein, one of their own--, and Sh'mu'eloff having his Jewishness ignored by the

Catholic Church when Sh'mu'eloff was a Roman, English, and Byzantine Catholic throughout his lifetime.

Only Evangelical-- including Jewish-- Catholic and other Evangelical, and other sources bring up that

Sh'mu'eloff was even proud of his Jewish heritage and rebuked that many Sabra'im and 'olim would not

speak Lashon Ivrit).}

Some Lies That Anti Missionaries and Anti Semites Say

2012-01-14T16:48:00.000-05:00

"Jews don't believe in Jesus."
"Jesus didn't claim to be the Messiah."
"Jesus didn't claim to be G-d."
"You can't be a Jew if you believe in Jesus".
"You're no longer a Jew if you believe in Jesus."
"There are no Jews or gentiles in Jesus; there are only Christians."
"The Jews killed Jesus."
"All Jews are Anti Palestinian."
"The Holocaust didn't happen."
"The Holocaust was deserved."
"Adolf Hitler and the Nazis were Christians."
"Zionism is racism."
"Anti Zionism is not Anti Semitism."
"Once you become a Christian or Messianic Jew, you have to stop keeping Torah."
"Once you become a Christian or Messianic Jew, you have to keep all of Torah."
"Jesus invented a whole new religion."
"Jesus was a Self-Hating Jew."
"Jesus' followers turned Jesus into the Messiah and invented a whole new religion."
"Paul turned Jesus into the Messiah and invented a whole new religion ."
"Jesus' followers were Self-Hating Jews."
"Paul was a Self-Hating Jew."
"You become a gentile once you believe in Jesus."
"You become a gentile once you're baptized."
"Martin Luther was a Christian."
"The Crusaders were Christians."
"The Inquisitors were Christians."
"Catholics [excluding Evangelical Catholics, "fundamentalists"] are Christians."
"The Jews stole Palestine from the Palestinians."
"The Exodus didn't really happen."
"The Jewish Diaspora is just like any other Diaspora."
"Whites are the original Jews."
"Blacks are the original Jews."
"There are 10 Lost Tribes."
"Ashkenazic Jews are Khazars."
"Ashkenazic Jews are Edomites."
"The Talmud is as valid as Tanakh."
"Jews can be saved without Jesus."
"Jews can be saved by keeping Torah."
"Jews own everything [e.g., banks, Hollywood]."
"The Church is the New Israel."
"G-d no longer has a covenant with ethnic Jews-- at least until the End of Days."
"You're Jewish only if your mother is Jewish."
"You're either fully Jewish or at least Matrilineally Jewish, or you aren't Jewish."
"Jews for Jesus is trying to accomplish the destruction of the Jewish people that Hitler wanted to finish."
"You become as an ethnic Jew once you convert to Judaism."
"Only 6,000,000 or so Jews were murdered in the Holocaust."
"Jews for Jesus is a branch of the Southern Baptist Convention."
"Christians are Zionists only to convert to Jews to Christianity."